Proximal Femoral Screw Hemiepiphysiodesis in Children With Cerebral Palsy Improves the Radiographic Measures of Hip Subluxation.

BACKGROUND: Proximal femoral screw hemiepiphysiodesis (PFSH) is a promising technique for treatment of hip subluxation in children with cerebral palsy (CP). The aim of this study is to report radiographic outcomes of PFSH and to evaluate its role in changing the natural history of hip displacement in children with CP. METHODS: This is a single center retrospective chart review of children with CP that underwent PFSH with at least 2 years of radiographic follow-up. Demographic information, surgical details, complications, additional surgical procedures, and need for screw exchange were recorded. Radiographs were assessed for migration percentage (MP), neck shaft angle (NSA), head shaft angle (HSA), and articular trochanter distance preoperatively as well as at 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, and latest follow-up postoperatively. Hips were divided into group 1 (no previous hip surgery) and group 2 (PFSH performed after hip reconstruction). Hips with 2 years of preoperative radiographic data were included in the natural history cohort. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (44 hips) met inclusion criteria with an average age of 7.3±1.7 years and a mean follow-up of 33.5 months. Group 1 and group 2 had 32 and 12 hips, respectively. Group 1 had significant improvement in all parameters (ΔMP=5%, ΔNSA=13 degrees, ΔHSA=15 degrees) group 2 showed improvements in NSA and HSA (ΔNSA=4 degrees ΔHSA=8 degrees) with only HSA reaching significance and MP remaining unchanged. All radiographic measurements worsened in the 2 years before surgery (N=25, natural history group) and improved after PFSH. Screw exchange occurred in 12 hips (27.2%) at an average of 33 months (range 27 to 42 mo) with 2 hips also undergoing pelvic osteotomy at that time. Three hips had a MP >50% at follow-up with 2 hips in group 1 undergoing hip reconstruction. No complications were noted. CONCLUSION: PFSH effectively alters proximal femoral growth and can improve hip subluxation in children with CP. Screws often need to be exchanged and hips should be carefully monitored. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Can Over-containment Prevent Recurrence in Children With Cerebral Palsy and Hip Dysplasia Undergoing Hip Reconstruction?

INTRODUCTION: Hip reconstruction is often necessary in children with cerebral palsy (CP) but is associated with high failure rates. Over-containment deeply seats the hip within the acetabulum at the time surgical reconstruction. The goal of this study is to evaluate the effect of over-containment on radiographic outcomes and failure rates in children with CP undergoing hip reconstruction. METHODS: This study is a retrospective chart review of children with CP that underwent hip reconstruction between 2010 and 2019 with at least 2 years of radiographic follow-up. Migration percentage (MP), acetabular index (AI), and neck shaft angle (NSA) were recorded preoperatively, postoperatively and throughout follow-up. Failures were defined as a MP at latest follow-up ≥30% or need for revision hip reconstruction. Hips were divided into groups based on postoperative MP-group 1 (over-containment group) had a MP≤0% and group 2 had an MP>0%. Radiographic parameters and failure rates were compared across Gross Motor Functional Classification Score (GMFCS) level, age at the time of surgery, and degree of preoperative subluxation. RESULTS: A cohort of 108 patients (197 hips) with an average age of 7.3±3.2 years met inclusion criteria with an average follow-up of 49.6 months (range: 24 to 118 mo). There were 147 hips in group 1 and 50 hips in group 2. At latest follow-up, group 1 demonstrated lower MP, AI, and NSA in comparison to group 2. The overall failure rate in our cohort was 8.1% (16 hips). Failure rates trended lowest in hips that were over-contained (6.1% v. 14.0%) although not statistically significant. Over-containment resulted in significantly lower failure rates in GMFCS IV/V hips, children under age 6 at the time of surgery and those with a higher degree of preoperative hip displacement (MP>50%). CONCLUSIONS: Over-containment at the time of hip reconstruction can positively affect radiographic outcomes and failure rates in children with CP. Over-containment should be considered in hips at high risk of failure, especially non ambulatory children with significant hip subluxation at an early age. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Are Postcast Removal X-rays and a Second Follow-up Necessary in the Treatment of Nondisplaced Supracondylar Humerus Fractures?

BACKGROUND: The utility of routine follow-up radiographs for the treatment of nondisplaced pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures has not been established. The purpose of this study is to (1) determine the frequency that postcast removal x-rays change patient management and (2) determine the role of routine follow-up for range of motion evaluation after cast removal in the treatment of nondisplaced supracondylar humerus fractures. METHODS: We conducted a single center retrospective chart review of patients under the age of 18 years old that sustained nondisplaced supracondylar humerus fractures between January 1, 2010 and July 1, 2018. Demographic information, fracture characteristics, time to follow-up and each appointment outcome were recorded. A change in patient management after postcast removal x-ray was defined as a need for an additional period of immobilization, a delay in initiation of range of motion exercises, or need for operative intervention. In addition, the appointment for range of motion evaluation was considered to alter management if further activity restriction was required, a formal physical therapy program was recommended or an additional office visit required. Unscheduled appointments were also noted. RESULTS: A total of 489 patients met inclusion criteria. The average age was 4.90±2.68 years and 51.8% were female. A total of 487 patients had routine follow-up x-rays after cast removal. No patient had a change of management based on postcast removal radiographs. In all, 290 patients returned for range of motion follow-up with 94.8% of patients being discharged from care. There were 14 patients whose management changed based on this evaluation (4.8%). The most common reason was an additional appointment for range of motion evaluation (12/14 patients, 86%). There were 13 patients with unscheduled evaluation after discharge from care, 77% were secondary to repeat injury. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that postcast removal x-rays and routine follow-up after cast removal rarely change patient management and may not be necessary in the treatment of nondisplaced pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-case series.