A multicenter, randomized phase 2 study to establish combinations of CBP501, cisplatin and nivolumab for ≥3rd-line treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: There is no standard of care for ≥ 3rd-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). CBP501 is a novel calmodulin-binding peptide that has been shown to enhance the influx of platinum agents into tumor cells and tumor immunogenicity. This study aimed to (1) confirm efficacy of CBP501/cisplatin/nivolumab for metastatic PDAC observed in a previous phase 1 study, (2) identify combinations that yield 35% 3-month progression-free survival rate (3MPFS) and (3) define the contribution of CBP501 to the effects of combination therapy. METHODS: CBP501 16 or 25 mg/m2 (CBP(16) or CBP(25)) was combined with 60 mg/m2 cisplatin (CDDP) and 240 mg nivolumab (nivo), administered at 3-week intervals. Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 to (1) CBP(25)/CDDP/nivo, (2) CBP(16)/CDDP/nivo, (3) CBP(25)/CDDP and (4) CDDP/nivo, with randomization stratified by ECOG PS and liver metastases. A Fleming two-stage design was used, yielding a one-sided type I error rate of 2.5% and 80% power when the true 3MPFS is 35%. RESULTS: Among 36 patients, 3MPFS was 44.4% in arms 1 and 2, 11.1% in arm 3% and 33.3% in arm 4. Two patients achieved a partial response in arm 1 (ORR 22.2%; none in other arms). Median PFS and OS were 2.4, 2.1, 1.5 and 1.5 months and 6.3, 5.3, 3.7 and 4.9 months, respectively. Overall, all treatment combinations were well tolerated. Most treatment-related adverse events were grade 1-2. CONCLUSIONS: The combination CBP(25)/(16)/CDDP/nivo demonstrated promising signs of efficacy and a manageable safety profile for the treatment of advanced PDAC. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04953962.

VEGF remains an interesting target in advanced pancreas cancer (APCA): results of a multi-institutional phase II study of bevacizumab, gemcitabine, and infusional 5-fluorouracil in patients with APCA.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab combined with gemcitabine followed by infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with advanced pancreas cancer (APCA). DESIGN: Patients with untreated APCA received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) over 100 min, and 5-FU 2400 mg/m(2) over 48 h on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months from initiation of therapy. If PFS at 6 months was ≥41%, the regimen would be considered promising. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were enrolled in the study; of which, 39 were evaluable for primary end point. PFS at 6 months was 49% (95% CI 34% to 64%). Median PFS was 5.9 months (95% CI 3.5 to 8.1) and median overall survival (OS) was 7.4 months (95% CI 4.7 to 11.2). Partial response and stable disease occurred in 30% and 45% of patients, respectively. Treatment-related hypertension and normal baseline albumin correlated with an improved response rate, PFS and OS. Grade 3 to 4 toxicities included fatigue (14%), hypertension (5%), and venous thrombosis (5%). CONCLUSIONS: The study met its primary end point. Further investigation of anti-VEGF therapy in combination with fluoropyrimidine-based therapy is warranted in APCA. Treatment-related hypertension and normal baseline albumin may predict for the efficacy of bevacizumab and should be investigated in prospective studies.

A phase II study of bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel in locally advanced and metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers.

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab has demonstrated antitumor activity in multiple diseases. This phase II study was undertaken to determine the effects of adding bevacizumab to a regimen of docetaxel and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease and a performance status (PS) of 0-1 were eligible for this study. Patients received bevacizumab at 7.5 mg/kg, docetaxel at 70 mg/m(2), and oxaliplatin at 75 mg/m(2) administered on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The primary end point of the study was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: A total of 38 eligible patients (median age 57 years, 45% gastric, 55% PS 0) were enrolled on to the study. Median PFS was 6.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.4-10.5] and median survival 11.1 months (95% CI 8.2-15.3). Complete responses were documented in 2 (5%) patients, partial responses in 14 (37%), and stable disease in 14 (37%). No treatment-related deaths were observed. The most commonly reported grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia (34%), and gastrointestinal perforation occurred in three patients (8%). CONCLUSION: The combination of bevacizumab, docetaxel, and oxaliplatin has promising activity for further evaluation in randomized trials.

A randomised phase II study of OSI-7904L versus 5-fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) as first-line treatment in patients with advanced biliary cancers.

The prognosis of advanced biliary tract carcinoma is poor with chemotherapy limited to a palliative role. This randomised study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a new liposomal thymidylate synthase inhibitor (TSI), OSI-7904L, in parallel with a modified de Gramont regimen of 5-FU/LV in patients with advanced biliary cancer. Patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic carcinoma of the biliary tract were randomised to receive either OSI-7904L 12 mg/m2 intravenously every 21 days or a modified de Gramont schedule of 5-FU/LV (intravenous l-LV 200 mg/m2, bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m2 and a 46-h infusion of 5-FU 2,400 mg/m2) every 14 days. Twenty-two patients were randomised, 11 to each group. No patients responded in the OSI-7904L arm, while one patient achieved a partial response in the 5-FU/LV arm. The rates of disease stabilisation were 4/11 (OSI-7904L) and 10/11 (5-FU/LV). Both treatment arms were generally well tolerated. These results show that the activity of OSI-7904L is below a level of clinical relevance in advanced biliary tract cancer, providing only a small degree of disease stabilisation. A simplified de Gramont schedule appears to have marginally more activity. Both treatments were well tolerated.

A phase II study of carboplatin and paclitaxel in esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of combination carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with esophageal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients were enrolled. Patients were treated with paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.) over 3 h and carboplatin i.v. at an AUC of 5 mg/h/ml. Thirty-three patients were assessable for toxicity and objective response. RESULTS: A total of 166 treatment courses were administered with a median of five courses per patient. The objective response rate was 43% [90% confidence interval (CI) 0.3-0.58] by the intention-to-treat analysis. The median response duration was 2.8 months (90% CI 2.1-5.4). The median survival time was 9 months (90% CI 7-13.8) and the 1-year survival rate was 43% (90% CI 0.29-0.57). The major grade 3-4 toxicity observed was neutropenia, occurring in 17 patients (52%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel is an moderately active and tolerable regimen in advanced esophageal cancer.

Phase II study of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and infusional fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase II study was undertaken to determine the efficacy of adding infusional fluorouracil (FU) to the chemotherapy doublet of gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The eligibility criteria included histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the pancreas that was either unresectable or metastatic. No prior gemcitabine therapy was allowed. Patients received a combination of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on days 1, 8, and 15; cisplatin 50 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 15; and FU 175 mg/m2/d from days 1 to 15 by continuous IV infusion. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Objective tumor response and toxicity were evaluated according to the World Health Organization criteria. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients (median age, 57 years; males, 59%) were enrolled. Sixteen patients had locally advanced (LA) disease, and 31 patients had metastatic disease. A total of 183 cycles of chemotherapy were administered. In patients with metastatic disease (n = 31), the probability of survival at 6 and 12 months was 66% and 34%, respectively. Objective partial response or stable disease was observed in 26% (90% confidence interval [CI], 0.14 to 0.41) and 61% (90% CI, 0.45 to 0.74) of patients, respectively. In patients with LA disease (n = 16), there were three partial responses (19%; 90 CI, 0.07 to 0.39). One patient in this group was successfully resected after FU-based radiotherapy. The most common grade 3 to 4 toxicities were neutropenia (60%), thrombocytopenia (42%), and anemia (26%). Thirteen patients were hospitalized for treatment-related complications. CONCLUSION: The combination of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and infusional FU has significant activity in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

A phase I clinical trial of spicamycin derivative KRN5500 (NSC 650426) using a phase I accelerated titration "2B" design.

The spicamycin derivative KRN5500 was considered as a potential anti-cancer agent based on in vitro and preclinical studies. A Phase I study involving 24 cancer patients in whom tumors were refractory to all other conventional therapies was conducted to determine the dose limiting toxicity, maximum tolerated dose, effectiveness, and pharmacokinetic parameters of this drug administered by 1-h IV infusion daily for five consecutive days every 3 weeks. Using an accelerated dose titration strategy, 8.4 mg/m2/d x 5 days was the maximum administered dose. Severe gastrointestinal and hepatic toxicities were observed at doses at or above 4.3 mg/m2/d x 5. The recommended Phase II dose i s 4.3mg/m2/d x 5. The distribution of KRN5500 followed a two-compartment model, and clearance did not decrease significantly over the dose range 0.8-8.4 mg/m2/d x 5. No significant correlation was observed between plasma levels and toxicity. No tumor responses were observed among the 14 patients evaluable for response.

Phase I trial of radiation dose escalation with concurrent weekly full-dose gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: The primary objective of this phase I trial was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of radiation that could be delivered to the primary tumor concurrent with full-dose gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty seven patients with unresectable (n = 34) or incompletely resected pancreatic cancer (n = 3) were treated. Gemcitabine was administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion at a dose of 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Radiation therapy was initiated on day 1 and directed at the primary tumor alone, without prophylactic nodal coverage. The starting radiation dose was 24 Gy in 1.6-Gy fractions. Escalation was achieved by increasing the fraction size in increments of 0.2 Gy, keeping the duration of radiation constant at 3 weeks. A second cycle of gemcitabine alone was intended after a 1-week rest. RESULTS: Two of six assessable patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity at the final planned dose level of the trial (42 Gy in 2.8-Gy fractions), one with grade 4 vomiting and one with gastric/duodenal ulceration. Two additional patients at this dose level experienced late gastrointestinal toxicity that required surgical management. CONCLUSION: The final dose investigated (42 Gy) is not recommended for further study considering the occurrence of both acute and late toxicity. However, a phase II trial of this novel gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy approach, at a radiation dose of 36 Gy in 2.4-Gy fractions, is recommended on the basis of tolerance, patterns of failure, and survival data.

Combined-modality therapy in pancreatic cancer: current status and future directions.

The use of chemotherapy with concurrent radiation therapy remains a standard treatment option for patients with unresectable or resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. This treatment strategy is based in large part on data from serial Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group (GITSG) trials, which have included 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Unfortunately, the majority of patients continue to succumb to the disease process. Recently, there has been a resurgence in clinical trials investigating alternative combined modality treatment strategies for patients with pancreatic cancer. In this review, we will summarize both the mature and more recent data pertaining to combined modality therapy for patients with unresectable or resected pancreatic cancer. Strategies utilizing concurrent gemcitabine, alternative radiation therapy techniques, and/or altered sequencing of therapies will be highlighted. Such modifications to the approach in use since the 1980s will need to be fully considered as clinical trials utilizing chemoradiotherapy regimens and new systemic agents or novel targeted therapies are designed.

Phase II study of gemcitabine and cisplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic carcinoma is considered among the most chemoresistant of human malignancies. The most commonly used cytotoxic single agents, 5-fluorouracil and 2'-deoxy-2',2'-difluorocytidine (gemcitabine), have objective response rates of less than 10% in large studies. Hypothesizing noncross resistance and a synergistic interaction between gemcitabine and cisplatin, early clinical studies have demonstrated significant activity with this combination in patients with several types of malignant disease. A Phase II study was undertaken to determine the efficacy of gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin in patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic carcinoma based on these considerations. METHODS: The eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed, locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic exocrine carcinoma of the pancreas with no prior gemcitabine therapy; prior adjuvant therapy was allowed provided the last day of therapy was at least 6 months prior to starting treatment; clinically measurable or evaluable disease; a Southwest Oncology Group scale performance status of 0-2; a life expectancy of > 12 weeks; and adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function. A total of 42 patients, 4 patients with locally advanced, unresectable disease and 38 patients with metastatic disease, were treated and received a total of 211 cycles of therapy between May 1997 to March 1999. The median age of patients was 61.5 years. The patients were treated in the outpatient setting with a combination of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/M(2) intravenously over 30 minutes administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle and cisplatin 50 mg/M(2) intravenously administered after gemcitabine infusion on Days 1 and 15 with adequate prehydration accompanied by adequate urinary output. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Response and toxicity were assessed according to World Health Organization and standard criteria. RESULTS: The complete and partial response rate among all 42 registered patients was 11 of 42 patients (26%; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.42). Stabilization of disease was seen in 15 patients (38%). Two additional patients with metastatic disease who achieved major responses to chemotherapy were rendered free of disease surgically, achieving a complete response status. The median overall survival was 7.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.3-9.1 months), with 64% of patients alive at 6 months and 19% of patients alive at 12 months. The median time to disease progression was 5.4 months (range, 0.9-20.8 months). Major toxicities were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, with one episode of neutropenic fever. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin appeared to have significantly greater activity than single-agent gemcitabine in this Phase II study, with tolerable toxicity. The antitumor activity of this combination needs to be confirmed in multi-institutional or comparative trials.

Chronic oral administration of CI-994: a phase 1 study.

OBJECTIVES: CI-994 (N-acetyl dinaline, PD 123654) is a novel oral agent active in a broad variety of murine and human tumor xenografts. While cytotoxic in the Brown Norway (BN) rat leukemia model, growth inhibition in other murine and human tumor xenografts is predominantly cytostatic. Its specific mechanism of action remains unknown. Following CI-994 administration, inhibition of both histone deacetylation and cellular proliferation at the G1 to S transition phase of the cell cycle are observed. This Phase 1 study in patients with solid tumors was carried out to determine a maximum tolerated daily oral dose (MTD) for CI-994 administered on a chronic basis. METHODS: Fifty-three patients received CI-994 daily for treatment durations ranging from 2 to 10 weeks. Dosage escalation proceeded in 2 phases; an Acute Dosing Phase (n = 11) to define the MTD for CI-994 administered over 2 weeks and a Chronic Dosing Phase (n = 29) to define the MTD for daily administration for 8 weeks. Upon completion of the Chronic Dosing Phase, a third cohort of patients (n = 13) received CI-994 at the recommended Phase 2 dose and schedule with 2 additional single doses of drug administered separated by a 1-week washout to assess the effect of food on CI-994 pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Thrombocytopenia was dose limiting at the MTD of 8 mg/m2/day for 8 weeks. Other toxicities included fatigue and gastrointestinal effects such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation and mucositis. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed that peak plasma levels and AUC's generally increased with dose and that food intake did not affect the rate or extent of drug absorption. One patient with heavily pre-treated adenocarcinoma of the lung achieved a Partial Response (PR) lasting over 2 years and 3 additional patients achieved Stable Disease (SD), 1 each with non-small cell lung, colorectal, and renal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended Phase 2 starting dose is 8 mg/m2/day for 8 weeks repeated after a 2-week drug-free interval.

Phase II study of liposomal doxorubicin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Doxil is a liposomal preparation of doxorubicin that results in prolonged pharmacologic exposure in vivo to the active agent. We sought to test the hypothesis that this new formulation would result in improved efficacy in patients with colorectal cancer. Patients with advanced colorectal cancer who had received prior therapy were eligible for the trial. Treatment consisted of Doxil 45 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks. Seventeen patients entered the trial and they received a median of two cycles of treatment. None of the patients had a partial response to treatment. Stable disease was the best response, and one patient received therapy for 17 cycles before her disease progressed. The therapy was well tolerated, with only two patients having the dose decreased because of hand-foot syndrome. Four patients experienced allergic reactions during the infusion, but with appropriate premedication and slowing of the infusion, treatment was able to be resumed without difficulty. No greater than grade I neutropenia or thrombocytopenia developed in any patient. Although Doxil was well tolerated at this dose and schedule, it was not an active agent in this group of patients. Doxil alone or in combination with other agents is worthy of further study in cancers responsive to doxorubicin.

A phase II trial of bryostatin 1 in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Current chemotherapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer is relatively ineffective and may be associated with significant toxicity. Bryostatin 1 (bryo 1) influences cell proliferation, intracellular metabolism and signaling, differentiation, and apoptosis in human cancer cell lines via modulation of protein kinase C (PKC) activity. This trial investigates the efficacy and toxicity of bryo 1 as a novel therapeutic agent for patients with advanced colorectal cancer who have had previous 5-fluorouracil therapy. The primary end point was tumor response to bryo 1. Toxicity was also assessed. Twenty-eight patients with advanced colorectal cancer were enrolled. The mean age was 59 years (range, 38-76), with 16 men and 12 women, and good minority representation (11 African-Americans). The first 10 patients initially received 25 microg/m2 of bryo 1 weekly as a 24-h infusion for 3 weeks of every 4-week cycle, with dose escalation to 35 microg/m2 starting with the second cycle. The remaining patients were started at 35 microg/m2 and escalated to 40 microg/m2, if toxicity was minimal. Twenty-five patients were evaluable for objective tumor response, and complete data on toxicity were collected on 26 patients. No partial or complete tumor responses were observed. All 25 patients had disease progression within four cycles. Myalgia was the most common toxicity. Myelosuppression was not seen. bryo 1 as a weekly 24-h continuous infusion lacks single-agent antitumor activity in advanced colorectal cancer. Toxicity differs from that of traditional chemotherapeutic drugs.

Cisplatin, cytarabine, caffeine, and continuously infused 5-fluorouracil (PACE) in the treatment of advanced pancreatic carcinoma: a phase II study.

Encouraging results using cisplatin, cytarabine, and caffeine for the treatment of pancreatic carcinoma prompted a phase II study using these agents and adding continuous intravenous infusion (CI) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (PACE). Patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma who had not received prior cytotoxic therapy were eligible. Treatment consisted of the following: on day 1, the administration of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 IV, cytarabine 2 g/m2 IV every 12 hours x 2 doses, and caffeine 400 mg/m2 subcutaneously after each cytarabine dose; and on days 3 to 21, 5-FU 250 mg/m2/day given by CI. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Thirty eligible patients were entered in the study. The median number of cycles received was three. Grade IV neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 53% and 27% of patients, respectively. Among 30 treated patients, complete remission (CR) was seen in 2 patients and partial remission (PR) in 3 patients, for an overall response rate of 16.7% (95% confidence interval 6.8-32.4%). The median survival was 5.0 months (range: 0.3-32.4 months) and 16.7% and 10% of patients were alive at 1 and 2 years. respectively. Changes in the serum level of CA 19-9 provided an early marker of response which translated in differences in survival. Those with increasing or decreasing/stable levels of CA 19-9 after the first cycle of therapy had median survivals of 1.7 and 8.3 months, respectively (p = 0.0002). Although PACE chemotherapy produced durable responses in pancreatic cancer, the toxicity was substantial. A modification of this regimen with newer, less toxic drugs may provide better results and reduced toxicity. Also, the monitoring of the serum CA 19-9 level may provide a means to assess response and predict survival.

Multidrug resistance phenotype in high grade soft tissue sarcoma: correlation of P-glycoprotein immunohistochemistry with pathologic response to chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: P-glycoprotein-mediated drug efflux has been implicated as an important mechanism of multidrug resistance (MDR) in cancer. Its role in chemotherapy resistance in soft tissue sarcoma is unclear. METHODS: Tumor specimens prior to and following neoadjuvant chemotherapy from 29 cases of high grade soft tissue sarcoma were analyzed with 2 monoclonal antibodies (C494 and JSB-1) that recognize different epitopes of P-glycoprotein. Staining intensity was graded 0 = negative, 1 = equivocal, 2 = moderate, 3 = strong. Only cases with Grade 2 or 3 staining intensity with both antibodies were considered MDR positive. The resection specimens were evaluated for tumor necrosis postchemotherapy. Pathologic response was graded as good for <15%, moderate for 15-50%, or poor for >50% posttreatment tumor viability. RESULTS: Of the 29 pretreatment specimens, 10 (34%) were MDR positive and 19 (66%) were MDR negative. Pathologic response to treatment was characterized as good in 6, moderate in 7, and poor in 16 patients. Of the MDR positive biopsies, 9 (90%) had poor response, compared with 7 (36%) in the MDR negative biopsy group (P = 0.0078). None of the cases with MDR positive biopsies had a good response, compared with 6 cases in which biopsies were MDR negative (32%) (P = 0.057). Only one MDR negative case became MDR positive posttreatment. CONCLUSIONS: Expression of MDR phenotype is found in approximately one-third of high grade soft tissue sarcomas. These preliminary data show a significant correlation between MDR phenotype and poor pathologic response to chemotherapy, and suggest that MDR induction by chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma is an uncommon event.

High-grade extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma: a high-grade epithelioid malignancy.

AIMS: Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma is typically a low-to-intermediate grade sarcoma that is associated with a prolonged clinical course. High-grade forms are rare and not well characterized. In this series we report the clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural findings in four cases of high-grade extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma. METHODS AND RESULTS: The patients were three men and one woman (ages 34-73 years) with tumours located in the thigh (two cases), paraspinal soft tissue and perineum. Three patients had metastases, one at 12 weeks, one at 10 months, and one at presentation of recurrent tumour. In the latter case the original tumour was low grade and became high grade when it recurred 3.5 years later. All three patients died of disease. One patient was lost to follow-up. The most striking histological feature in all four tumours was the presence of numerous large epithelioid cells. These cells were arranged in cords within myxoid matrix and in sheets devoid of matrix. Two tumours had areas of conventional extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma intermixed with the high-grade areas. One tumour showed transition to high-grade spindle cell sarcoma. One tumour had cells with rhabdoid features. Immunohistochemically, two tumours focally expressed S100 protein, and one focally expressed EMA. All were negative with cytokeratin, desmin, smooth muscle actin, HMB45, CD31 and CD34. Ultrastructural features in three cases were compatible with chondrosarcoma; one tumour had aggregates of microtubules within rough endoplasmic reticulum, a characteristic feature of this tumour. CONCLUSIONS: High-grade extraskeletal myxoid chondrosaroma is a rare and aggressive soft tissue sarcoma, and should be included in the differential diagnosis of other epithelioid malignancies.

Hepatic chemoembolization combined with systemic infusion of 5-fluorouracil and bolus leucovorin for patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma: A Southwest Oncology Group pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: Rates of response to systemic chemotherapy among patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma rarely exceed 25- 30%, and complete responses are rare. The liver is the most common site of metastasis; however, regional therapies have not improved survival rates. The Southwest Oncology Group designed a clinical trial combining hepatic arterial chemoembolization with systemic infusion of 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in an attempt to increase the complete response rate and prolong the time to disease progression. METHODS: Patients with documented liver metastasis from colorectal carcinoma were treated with two or three cycles of chemoembolization using a collagen suspension with doxorubicin, mitomycin C, and cisplatin. Subsequently, systemic chemotherapy with continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil and weekly leucovorin was initiated. Patients were assessed for response at 12-week intervals, with treatment continuing until disease progression. RESULTS: Thirty-one eligible, evaluable patients were treated. One complete and 8 partial responses were observed, for an overall response rate of 29%. Fifty-eight percent of patients survived 1 year, and the median survival for the whole cohort was 14 months. The median time to progression was 8 months. Seven patients (23%) experienced Grade 4 toxicity and 21 patients (67%) had Grade 3 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The response rate in this trial was comparable to that achieved with systemic chemotherapy consisting of a fluorinated pyrimidine-based regimen for patients with this disease. No improvement in complete response rate or time to progression was observed compared with the Southwest Oncology Group's experience with systemic therapy. The authors are not planning to study this regimen further as a treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

Gemcitabine and UFT plus oral calcium folinate: phase I study.

Gemcitabine (Gemzar) is a nucleoside analog increasingly used in the treatment of a variety of solid tumors. DNA synthesis is inhibited by gemcitabine by masked chain termination and via inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase. Synergy may exist between gemcitabine and other antimetabolites, including 5-fluorouracil. The varying patterns of dose-limiting toxicities to gemcitabine and UFT (uracil and tegafur in a 4:1 molar ratio) plus oral calcium folinate (Orzel) permit their use in combination. The primary aim of this phase I study is to determine the maximum tolerated doses of gemcitabine and UFT plus oral calcium folinate in patients with a variety of solid tumors. Only eight patients have been recruited to date, with myelosuppression being the main toxicity observed.

Phase II study of CI-958 in colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: We completed a phase II trial of CI-958 (NSC 635371) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer given at a dose of 700 mg/m2 every 21 days. METHODS: All 15 patients had metastatic disease and had been previously treated with one 5-fluorouracil-based regimen in an adjuvant (six) or metastatic (nine) setting. RESULTS: None of the patients treated with CI-958 had an objective response to treatment. Median survival was 4.8 months after the start of treatment. Leukopenia was the major toxicity, but no patient experienced febrile neutropenia. An acute febrile reaction was seen after infusion in four of the first nine patients treated. This was abrogated by pretreatment with dexamethasone in the remaining patients. CONCLUSIONS: CI-958 was not effective at this dose and schedule in patients with previously treated advanced colorectal cancer.

Evaluation of pyrazoloacridine in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Pyrazoloacridine (PZA) is an acridine derivative selected for clinical development because of broad pre-clinical antitumor activity and solid tumor selectivity. Phase I evaluations with PZA have demonstrated predictable toxicity and suggested clinical efficacy. A phase II trial in patients with previously untreated advanced pancreatic cancer was conducted. METHODS: PZA was administered at a dose of 750 mg/m2 intravenously over 3 hours every 21 days. Seventeen patients were treated receiving a total of 46 courses of PZA. RESULTS: Of the 15 patients evaluable for response, no responses were observed (0% response rate, 95% confidence interval 0-22%). Major toxicities directly attributable to PZA included moderate neutropenia and mild neurotoxicity. CONCLUSION: PZA at this dose and schedule of administration was inactive in patients with pancreatic carcinoma.