Clinical and Immunological Impact of Ocrelizumab Extended Interval Dosing in Multiple Sclerosis: A Single-Center, Real-World Experience.

Ocrelizumab (OCR), an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is approved for treating relapsing remitting (RR) and primary progressive (PP) multiple sclerosis (MS). The standard interval dosing (SID) regimen requires intravenous infusions every six months. Experience of extended dosing due to COVID-19 pandemic-related issues suggests that this strategy may provide comparable efficacy while reducing treatment burden and healthcare costs. This study aimed to evaluate clinical effectiveness, changes in B- and T-cell count, and immunoglobulin dynamics associated with extended interval dosing (EID) of ocrelizumab in a real-world setting. We retrospectively included RRMS or PPMS patients treated with OCR that had already received two OCR cycles and with at least 6 months of follow up after the last infusion. EID was defined as a ≥4 weeks delay compared to SID. Clinical outcomes were occurrence of relapses, MRI activity, 6-months confirmed disability progression (CDP) and their combination (No Evidence of Disease Activity, NEDA-3). We also evaluated changes in CD19+ B cell count, CD4+ and CD8+ T cell count, immunoglobulin titers, and occurrence of hypogammaglobulinemia (hypo-Ig). Frequency tests, multivariate regression models, and survival analysis were applied as appropriate. We analyzed data on 93 subjects (75.3% RRMS) for a total of 389 infusions (272 SID, 117 EID). Clinical and MRI activity, CDP, and NEDA 3 did not significantly differ between EID and SID. EID was associated with lower rates of B-cell depletion. T-cell dynamics and incidence of hypo-Ig were comparable following EID and SID. Hypo-IgG at index infusion was associated with further occurrence of hypo-IgG; male sex and hypo-IgM at index infusion were independently associated with hypo-IgM. In conclusion, OCR EID does not impact MS clinical and radiological outcomes, although it interferes with B-cell dynamics. These findings provide support for a tailored schedule of OCR in MS.

CNS inflammatory demyelinating events after COVID-19 vaccines: A case series and systematic review.

Background: Vaccinations provided the most effective tool to fight the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. It is now well established that COVID-19 vaccines are safe for the general population; however, some cases of rare adverse events following immunization have been described, including CNS Inflammatory Demyelinating Events (CIDEs). Although observational studies are showing that these events are rare and vaccines' benefits highly outweigh the risks, collecting and characterizing post-COVID-19 vaccine CIDEs might be relevant to single out potential risk factors and suggest possible underlying mechanisms. Methods: Here we describe six CIDEs, including two acute transverse myelitis (ATM), three multiple sclerosis (MS), and one neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), occurring between 8 and 35 days from a COVID-19 vaccine. Moreover, we performed a systematic literature search of post-COVID-19 vaccines CIDEs, including ATM, ADEM, MS, and NMOSD/MOGAD, published worldwide between December 2020 and December 2021, during 1 year of the vaccination campaign. Clinical/MRI and CSF/serum characteristics were extracted from reviewed studies and pooled-analyzed. Results: Forty-nine studies were included in the systematic review, reporting a total amount of 85 CIDEs. Considering our additional six cases, 91 CIDEs were summarized, including 24 ATM, 11 ADEM, 47 MS, and nine NMOSD/MOGAD. Overall, CIDEs occurred after both mRNA (n = 46), adenoviral-vectored (n = 37), and inactivated vaccines (n = 8). Adenoviral-vectored vaccines accounted for the majority of ADEM (55%) and NMOSD/MOGAD (56%), while mRNA vaccines were more frequent in MS new diagnoses (87%) and relapses (56%). Age was heterogeneous (19-88) and the female sex was prevalent. Time from vaccine to symptoms onset was notably variable: ADEM and NMOSD/MOGAD had a longer median time of onset (12.5 and 10 days) compared to ATM and MS (6 and 7 days) and further timing differences were observed between events following different vaccine types, with ATM and MS after mRNA-vaccines occurring earlier than those following adenoviral-vectored ones. Conclusion: Both the prevalence of vaccine types for certain CIDEs and the heterogeneity in time of onset suggest that different mechanisms-with distinct dynamic/kinetic-might underly these events. While epidemiological studies have assessed the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, descriptions and pooled analyses of sporadic cases may still be valuable to gain insights into CIDE's pathophysiology.