Magnetic Resonance Imaging with a Weak Albumin Binding Contrast Agent can Reveal Additional Endoleaks in Patients with an Enlarging Aneurysm after EVAR.

OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND: To examine the additional diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after administration of a weak albumin binding contrast agent in post-endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) patients with aneurysm growth with no or uncertain endoleak after computed tomography angiography (CTA). METHODS: This was a prospective diagnostic cross sectional study carried out between April 2011 and August 2013. MRI was performed in all patients with aneurysm growth≥5 mm after EVAR implantation and no or uncertain endoleak on CTA, or the inability, on CTA, to identify the source of a visible endoleak. All MRI scans were performed on a 1.5 T clinical MRI scanner after administration of a weak albumin binding contrast agent. The presence of endoleaks was assessed by visually comparing pre- and post-contrast T1-weighted images with fat suppression. Post-contrast images were acquired 5 and 15 minutes after contrast administration. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (26 men; 90%) with a median age of 74 years (interquartile range [IQR] 67-76) were included. The median interval between EVAR and MRI was 39 months (IQR 20-50). The median increase in maximum aneurysm diameter during total follow up after EVAR was 11 mm (IQR 6-17). At CTA, 16 patients (55%) had no detectable endoleak, five patients (17%) had suspected but uncertain endoleak, and eight patients had a definite endoleak (28%). On the post-contrast MRI images, endoleak was observed in 24 patients (83%). In all patients with uncertain endoleak on CTA, endoleak was detected with MRI. For type II endoleaks, feeding vessels were detected in 22/23 patients (96%) and these were all, except one, lumbar arteries. CONCLUSION: In patients with enlarging aneurysms of unknown origin after EVAR, MRI with a weak albumin binding contrast agent has additional value for both the detection and determination of the origin of the endoleak.

CT angiography to evaluate hemodynamic changes in popliteal artery aneurysms during flexion and extension of the knee joint.

AIM: The aim of this study was to find out which characteristics of an asymptomatic popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) will increase the risk for acute thrombosis. METHODS: This was a single-center prospective study of consecutive patients with asymptomatic PAAs presenting from January 2010 to April 2012. Computed tomography angiography was used to perform measurements of the PAA during 0º extension and 90º flexion of the knee. After semi-automated segmentation of the popliteal artery (PA) lumen, a center lumen line (CLL) was automatically constructed. RESULTS: The study included 16 asymptomatic PAAs. Median lumen area of the PA was directly proximal and distal of the PAA 57 mm2 (IQR, 44-87 mm2) and 46 mm2 (IQR, 32-66 mm2) in extension vs. 51 mm2 (IQR, 38-73 mm2) and 38 mm2 (IQR, 30-62 mm2) during 90º flexion, respectively (P=0.007) and (P=0.03). The median of the greatest decrease in lumen area after flexion and extension of the knee was 36 mm (IQR, 28-48 mm) in PAAs≥30 mm compared with 11 mm (IQR, 4-18 mm) in PAAs<30 mm (P<0.05). The proximal angulation was a median 48° in extension (IQR, 27-61º) and 75° during flexion (IQR, 46-99º; P=0.02). Distal angulation was a median of 31° (IQR, 21-42º) after extension vs. 62° (IQR, 33-81º) during flexion (P=0.03). CONCLUSION: Knee bending in patients with PAAs will lead to a reduction in the lumen area of the PAA and a change in the degree of angulation of the PAA. A significant decrease in lumen area was seen in PAAs≥30 mm compared with PAAs<30 mm after flexion of the knee.

Spontaneous delayed sealing in selected patients with a primary type-Ia endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Direct additional therapy is advised for type-Ia endoleaks detected on completion angiography after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Additional intraoperative endovascular procedures are, however, often challenging or not possible, and direct open conversion is unattractive. The results of a selective, conservative strategy for patients with primary type-Ia endoleak has been analysed. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-centre study (UMC, Utrecht, NL). From 2004 to 2008, all patients with a primary type-Ia endoleak and suitable anatomy for EVAR, stentgraft oversizing ≥15%, and optimal deployment were included. Complications during follow-up were studied and all sequential CTA scans were reviewed. These were compared with the remaining patients, treated during the same period. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were included (14 male, median age 77, range 67-85) with a median aneurysm diameter of 60 mm (48-80), an aneurysm neck diameter of 26 mm (21-32), a neck length of 29 mm (11-39), and infrarenal angulation of 49° (31-90). One patient suffered rupture 2 days after EVAR - leading to the only AAA-related death. Eight of the 15 type-Ia endoleaks disappeared spontaneously on the first postoperative CTA, obtained within 1 week of EVAR. On the second postoperative CTA, obtained a median of 5 months (1-12) after EVAR, all remaining endoleaks had sealed. One recurrence occurred at 4.85 years. During a median follow-up of 3.3 years, there were five secondary interventions. Compared with controls, there were more secondary (or recurrent) type-1a endoleaks (13% vs. 4%), endograft migrations (13% vs. 3%), sac growths (33% vs. 16%), and secondary interventions (33% vs. 23%). None of these differences however, were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: All but one of the primary type-Ia endoleaks sealed spontaneously. Until sealing, the risk of rupture persisted, but subsequently only one recurrence of type-Ia endoleak was seen. In selected patients, a conservative approach for primary type-Ia endoleaks may be justified.

Magnetic resonance imaging is more sensitive than computed tomography angiography for the detection of endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this systematic review was to examine whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography angiography (CTA) is more sensitive for the detection of endoleaks in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) after EVAR. DESIGN: Systematic review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic electronic search was performed. Articles were included when post-EVAR patients were evaluated by both MRI as index test and CTA as comparison. Methodological quality was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients in whom MRI detected additional endoleaks, which were not seen with CTA. RESULTS: Eleven articles were included. The overall methodological quality of the articles was good. In total, 369 patients with 562 MRI and 562 CTA examinations were included. A total of 146 endoleaks were detected by CTA; MRI detected all but two of these endoleaks. With MRI 132 additional endoleaks were found. CONCLUSIONS: MRI is more sensitive compared to CTA for the detection of post-EVAR endoleaks, especially for the detection of type II endoleaks. MRI should be considered in patients with continued AAA growth and negative or uncertain findings at CTA.