How Lung Volume Recruitment Maneuvers Enhance Respiratory Function in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Quasi-Randomized Pilot Study.

Background and Objectives: In patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), a decrease in muscle strength can lead to limitations in pulmonary functions, potentially causing respiratory complications. To address these challenges, the lung volume recruitment (LVR) maneuver has emerged as a potential intervention. This study sought to evaluate the impact of a four-week LVR protocol on respiratory function in secondary progressive MS patients. Materials and Methods: In a quasi-randomized pre/post-controlled trial, 24 patients with secondary progressive MS were recruited. Participants aged 20-70 years with an EDSS score of 2 to 9 were alternately allocated to intervention (n = 12) or control groups (n = 12). The intervention group underwent a 4-week respiratory rehabilitation training focused on LVR, using a standardized cough machine treatment protocol twice daily. The control group received no respiratory intervention. Outcomes measured included forced vital capacity (FVC), maximal insufflation capacity (MIC), and peak cough flow (PCF), using turbine spirometry and other associated equipment. All measurements were taken at baseline (T0) and after 4 weeks (T1) by a blinded assessor. Results: For the intervention group, the mean difference pre/post-treatment in MIC (mL) was 0.45 (SD 1.13) (p = 0.02), and in MIC (%), it was 0.13 (SD 0.24) (p = 0.03). Compared to the control group (n = 10), the between-group mean difference for MIC (mL) was 0.54 (p = 0.02), and for MIC (%), it was 0.15 (p = 0.02). Conclusions: The short-term daily LVR protocol notably improved passive lung capacity, despite minimal changes in active lung capacity or cough force. The LVR maneuver offers promise for enhancing respiratory function, especially passive lung capacity, in secondary progressive MS patients. Further research should explore optimal treatment durations and frequencies for more extensive respiratory gains.

A telescopic paradox: the artisans of the Accademia del Cimento, their instruments and their (in)visibility.

The brief life of the Accademia del Cimento (1657-1667), the first known society with a purely experimental programme,11 Over the period of a year and a half in 2020-2021, I had the honor to join the European-funded research group Tacitroots under the direction of Professor Giulia Giannini, at the Università Statale di Milano. My task was to research the instruments of the Accademia del Cimento through the lens of social and cultural history. I therefore approached these instruments as cultural products, investigating the agencies that shaped them: specifically, I was interested in the processes involved in their design and construction. This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 101025015. is entangled with the most surprising advancements in the history of scientific instruments of that century, from the telescope to the microscope, the thermometer to the barometer, the hygrometer to the pendulum as a time-regulator, and more. The making of instruments at the Florentine court shows the interaction of princely, scholarly and artisanal actors. This paper explores this collaboration and shows how the supposed "invisibility' of artisans depended on their proximity to the academicians and princes, who mainly communicated verbally with them, directly or through middlemen. The visibility of artisans increases proportionally to their physical distance from the Court. In this essay I unveil the identity of the artisans of the Cimento and, finally, attempt to attribute five instruments (some lost and others still extant) to specific makers, shedding light also on relations between the artisan and his patron.

The assessment of the peak of reflex cough in subjects with acquired brain injury and tracheostomy and healthy controls.

INTRODUCTION: There is no standard procedure to evaluated the peak of reflex cough flow (PCF-reflex) in the literature, which is important assessment in subjects with acquired brain injury and tracheostomy cannula. The present study aims to investigate the PCF of the reflex cough in a broad sample of healthy controls and, furthermore, the presence and the strength of voluntary and reflex cough in subjects with ABI with tracheostomy cannula. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited 147 participants including the healthy subjects (n = 105) and acquired brain injury subjects (n = 43), who underwent respiratory assessment: the Tidal Volume, Forced Vital Capacity, PCF of voluntary cough (PCF-voluntary) and PCF-reflex (using a spirometer connected with a nebulizer by a bidirectional). RESULTS: The PCF-reflex of controls and subjects was significant lower than the PCF-voluntary (P < 0.01). The PCF-voluntary was not assessed in 26 (60.5 %) subjects due to severe cognitive deficit. In subjects without cognitive deficits (n = 17; 39.5 %), it was significantly lower than in healthy controls (p < 0.01). In contrast, the PCF-reflex was completed in all subjects and it was not significantly different from healthy controls. Furthermore, the strength of the PCF-reflex decreased with increasing inhalation numbers of nebulised air. CONCLUSION: Reflex cough behaviour differs largely from voluntary cough and the PCF results reflect this great discrepancy. PCF-reflex could be useful parameter for assessing the airway protection whereas PCF-voluntary for measuring airway clearance.

Use of ventilation bag for the respiratory support during magnetic resonance imaging in Arnold-Chiari ventilated patients, a case report.

Context: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is an essential diagnostic tool for neuroimaging tissues such as the spinal cord. Unfortunately, the use of MRI may be limited in ventilated patients, who cannot maintain the supine position in spontaneous breathing for the whole duration of the exam (i.e. neuro-muscular patients with diaphragm involvement). The use of MRI-compatible ventilator during MRI could be a solution but they are not universally available. Furthermore, their performances are not up to those of the conventional ones and they are not always compatible with Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV). Findings: This case report describes an easy and low-cost solution to ventilate a patient non-invasively during the MRI procedure. The patient in this case was a 45-yr-old man, wheelchair-dependent and chronically ventilated in NIV with a forced vital capacity in supine position of 370 ml (10% of predicted normal), affected by Arnold-Chiari Syndrome, and in need of a MRI diagnostic control. Conclusion: The technique proposed, that does not affect the MRI images quality, consists in ventilating the patient using a simple nonmetallic Ventilation Bag, operated by a Respiratory Therapist. This has been proven a useful and economical solution for ventilatory support during MRI for a respiratory-dependent patient with Arnold-Chiari Syndrome.

Clinical Criteria for Tracheostomy Decannulation in Subjects with Acquired Brain Injury.

BACKGROUND: Patients with acquired brain injury (ABI) often require long periods of having a tracheostomy tube for airway protection and prolonged mechanical ventilation. It has been recognized that fast and safe decannulation improves outcomes and facilitates the recovery process. Nevertheless, few studies have provided evidence for decannulation criteria, despite the high prevalence of ABI subjects with tracheostomies. The aim of our study was to assess which clinical parameters are the best predictors for decannulation in subjects with ABI. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we recruited 74 consecutive ABI subjects (mean age 51.52 ± 16.76) with tracheostomy tubes. First, the subjects underwent the original decannulation assessment for cannula removal. Second, they underwent our experimental decannulation protocol. The experimental protocol included: voluntary cough (cough peak flow ≥160 L/min), reflex cough, tracheostomy tube capping (≥72 h), swallowing instrumental assessment (penetration aspiration scale ≤5), blue dye test, number of trachea suctions, endoscopic assessment of airway patency (lumen diameter ≥50%), saturation (SpO2 >95%), and level of consciousness evaluation (Glasgow coma scale ≥8). The reference standard was clinical removal of the tracheostomy tube within 48 h. RESULTS: Parameters showing the highest values of sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were tracheostomy tube capping (80%, 100%), endoscopy assessment of airway patency (100%, 30%), swallowing instrumental assessment (85%, 96%), and the blue dye test (65%, 85%). All these were combined in a clinical cluster parameter, which had higher sensitivity (100%) and specificity (82%). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the best clinical prediction rule for decannulation in acquired brain injury subjects is a combination of the following assessments: (1) tracheostomy tube capping, (2) endoscopic assessment of patency of airways, (3) swallowing instrumental assessment, and (4) blue dye test.