Quality of life assessment: a comparison of four questionnaires: for measuring improvements after total hip replacement.

Three experimental questionnaires were compared with the Influence of Rheumatic Diseases on Health and Lifestyle (IRGL) questionnaire, a Dutch version of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales. Sixty-two patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and 35 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), all of whom underwent hip arthroplasty, completed the study. Results showed that visual analogue scales for pain, stiffness, fatigue, and anxiety were strongly correlated with a number of the IRGL scales. Patient preference scales were sensitive to change and provided additional information on aspects of the patients' quality of life (QOL) that were felt to be important by the patients themselves. The questionnaire on performance in various roles in life was insensitive to change. In existing questionnaires, there is an attempt to represent the concept of QOL in terms of its most important aspects. Such realizations of the concept of QOL are not entirely suitable for application in clinical trials. The IRGL is overly complex, and its sometimes comprehensive scales do not deal with the possible effects of treatment. Neither of these properties is conducive to sensitivity to change. Visual analogue scales reduce the complexity. A simpler representation of QOL that can evaluate aspects relevant to treatment is recommended.

Effects of total hip replacement on quality of life in patients with osteoarthritis and in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

The effects of total hip replacement (THR) on quality of life were investigated in 62 patients with osteoarthrosis (OA) and 35 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients eligible for a first hip joint replacement were enrolled consecutively and examined at home before the operation and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The IRGL (Influence of Rheumatic Diseases on Health and Lifestyle), a Dutch version of the AIMS (Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales), was used to operationalize quality of life in a questionnaire. Pain and mobility scores showed significant improvement among both OA and RA patients. The general mood of the OA patients also improved significantly, but the RA group showed only a favourable tendency in this respect. The interference of OA in several areas of life almost disappeared, whereas the impact of RA was only slightly reduced. There was no discernible effect on the social dimension in either group. A single THR apparently solves the main problem of most OA patients, but only one of a number of joint problems for most RA patients. The IRGL is complex and time-consuming and contains irrelevant scales. Its multidimensional evaluation of the quality of life is more informative than a purely somatic evaluation.

Sthenia, ambition and educational level in patients suffering from ankylosing spondylitis: a controlled study of personality features as compared to rheumatoid arthritis and unspecified low back pain.

As compared to control-groups of rheumatoid arthritis and chronic non-inflammatory low back pain, over a hundred polyclinical patients suffering from ankylosing spondylitis were assessed with respect to several personality characteristics by psychological testing and proved to be relatively sthenic and educated. In trying to explain these personality features some disease-related factors seem to be relevant in ankylosing spondylitis: a relatively mild course of disease, the relief of complaints by exercise and a long pre-diagnostic period.