RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Leishmania (Vianna) braziliensis, Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis and Leishmania (Leishmania) chagasi are important parasites in the scenario of leishmaniasis in Brazil. During the life cycle of these parasites, the promastigote forms adhere to the midgut epithelial microvillii of phlebotomine insects to avoid being secreted along with digestive products. Lulo cells are a potential model that will help to understand the features of this adhesion phenomenon. Here, we analyze the interaction between Leishmania spp. promastigotes and Lulo cells in vitro, specifically focusing on adhesion events occurring between three Leishmania species and this cell line. METHODS: Confluent monolayers of Lulo cells were incubated with promastigotes and adhesion was assessed using both light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. FINDINGS: The results indicate that species from the subgenera Leishmania and Viannia have great potential to adhere to Lulo cells. The highest adherence rate was observed for L. (L.) chagasi after 24 h of incubation with Lulo cells (27.3 ± 1.8% of cells with adhered promastigotes), followed by L. (L.) amazonensis (16.0 ± 0.7%) and L. (V.) braziliensis (3.0 ± 0.7%), both after 48 h. In the ultrastructural analysis, promastigote adherence was also assessed by scanning electron microscopy, showing that, for parasites from both subgenera, adhesion occurs by both the body and the flagellum. The interaction of Lulo cells with Leishmania (L.) chagasi showed the participation of cytoplasmic projections from the former closely associating the parasites with the cells. CONCLUSIONS: We present evidence that Lulo cells can be useful in studies of insect-parasite interactions for Leishmania species.
Assuntos
Adesão Celular , Interações Hospedeiro-Patógeno , Leishmania/patogenicidade , Psychodidae/citologia , Animais , Linhagem Celular , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Leishmania/crescimento & desenvolvimento , MicroscopiaRESUMO
Los cultivos celulares de mosquitos son frecuentemente utilizados para el aislamiento, identificación y caracterización de arbovirus. Para el estudio de los virus dengue (VDEN) y virus de fiebre amarilla (VFA) se emplean, principalmente, la línea celular C6/36 de Aedes albopictus y la línea celular AP61, obtenida de Aedes pseudoscutellaris. La línea celular de A. aegypti AEGY28, previamente obtenida a partir de tejidos embrionarios del vector, se utilizó en el presente trabajo para evaluar la susceptibilidad a la infección por VDEN y VFA. Para ello, los cultivos celulares se ensayaron a diferente multiplicidad de infección con los aislados clínicos de virus dengue tipo 2 (COL789, MOI: 1 y 5) y VFA (V341, MOI 0,02). Posteriormente se realizó la detección de antígenos virales por la técnica de inmunocitoquímica y su cuantificación por la técnica de CellELISA fluorométrica. Se usaron como controles positivos de infección, tanto células C6/36 como células VERO. Inesperadamente, no se observó inmunoreactividad en las células de A. aegypti infectadas con ambos tipos de virus en ninguno de los MOI o tiempos estudiados. Tampoco se evidenció antígeno por la técnica fluorométrica ni fue posible detectar RNA viral por RTPCR a partir de células infectadas. Por lo tanto, se puede concluir que la línea celular de A. aegypti no es susceptible a la infección por VDEN ni por VFA. Ello podría estar relacionado con características propias de la membrana celular o de la maquinaria enzimática necesaria para la replicación viral.
Mosquito cell derived cultures are useful tools for arbovirus isolation, identification or characterization. For studying dengue (DENV) and yellow fever viruses (YFV) Aedes albopictus C6/36 or Aedes pseudoscutellaris AP61 cell lines, are normally used. The Aedes aegypti AEGY28 cell line was obtained from embryonic tissues and characterized previously by one of us. In order to evaluate its susceptibility to two Flavivirus, AEGY28 cells were inoculated with different multiplicity of infection (MOI) with type 2 DENV (COL789, MOI: 1 and 5) and YFV clinical isolates (V341, MOI 0,02) then processed at different times post infection (p.i.). Immunostaining and fluorometric cellELISA were carried out to identify and quantify viral antigens. C6/36 and Vero cells were used as positive controls. Unexpectedly, immunoreactivity was not found in inoculated AEGY28 cells, even in higher MOI or late times p.i., therefore antigen quantification using fluorometric cellELISA were not plausible. Reverse transcriptase PCR with specific primers did not detect viral RNA in AEGY28 inoculated cells. We can conclude that Aedes aegypti AEGY28 cell line is not susceptible to dengue and yellow fever Flavivirus, a finding possibly related with the lacking of specific molecules at the plasma membrane or absence of cell machinery necessary for viral replication.
