Long-term use of etelcalcetide for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients undergoing hemodialysis for end-stage renal failure: a real-life retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with end-stage renal failure (ESRD) or dialysis frequently suffer from secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPTH), a severe complication of mineral metabolism disorders. The calcimimetic etelcalcetide has been approved and shown efficacy in randomized controlled trials, however, data are limited from real-life studies. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term use etelcalcetide for the treatment of sHPTH (PTH > 600 pg/mL) in patients undergoing extracorporeal hemodialysis for ESRD for at least 2 years. METHODS: In 45 patients, we administered etelcalcetide for the treatment of sHPTH (PTH > 600 pg/mL); One group of patients (control group, Group A; N = 26) were previously treated with intravenous vitamin D analogues only (paricalcitol 5 µg/ml, three times/week) and then treated with etelcalcetide and a second group of patients already on cinacalcet therapy for at least six months in combination with iv paricalcitol were switched to etelcalcetide (Group B, N = 19). RESULTS: PTH levels decreased over time in both groups of patients, with higher values for patients previously treated with cinacalcet (Group B) compared to Group A for the entire study duration even if the final value of the two groups was comparable. After 12 months, the percentage of subjects who had PTH concentrations within the targets recommended by KDIGO guidelines was 87% in Group A and 58% in Group B. In seven patients, despite a parathyroid gland volume > 1000 mm3, an adequate response in the reduction of PTH was obtained. CONCLUSION: Findings from this study demonstrate that the efficacy of etelcalcetide is maintained over the long term.

Clinical management of nondialysis patients with chronic kidney disease: a retrospective observational study. Data from the SONDA study (Survey Of Non-Dialysis outpAtients).

BACKGROUND: A lack of awareness of chronic kidney disease (CKD) often results in delayed diagnosis and inadequate treatment. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess the therapeutic management and outcome of nondialysis CKD patients. METHODS: Three hundred ninety-seven patients (54.9% males aged 67.5 ± 14.6 years) were retrospectively screened at the Nephrology Department, GB Grassi Hospital, Rome, Italy. After a baseline visit, patient data were collected every 6 months for a total of 24 months. Clinical characteristics were measured at baseline, then the following outcomes were measured every 6 months: staging of CKD, presence of concomitant diseases, treatment and adherence to Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) guidelines for anemia management. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-eight (92.7%) patients attended at least one visit and 92 (23.2%) patients attended all four visits. Patients were mainly referred to a nephrologist for chronic renal failure (61.7%) or hypertension (42.8%). At baseline, 79.6% of patients had previous hospitalization and 79.1% were receiving antihypertensive medication. Serum creatinine and/or glomerular filtration rate was examined in >90% of patients, whereas parathyroid hormone was rarely examined (5.5%). Vitamin D supplementation was received by 6.5% of patients. The majority of patients were staged at 3 or 4 CKD (32% and 23.9%, respectively) and did not significantly change over time. The use of antithrombotic, antilipidemic and erythropoietin medication increased over the four surveys. The majority of patients (86.8%) achieved hemoglobin K/DOQI target levels. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate a current lack of attention of CKD and related disorders (mineral metabolism, electrolyte balance, and anemia) at the level of the general practitioner (GP) and non-nephrology specialist, which can result in both delayed referral and inadequate treatment. By increasing both awareness of CKD and the coordinated relationship between GPs and nephrologists, patient clinical and therapeutic outcome may be improved.

Antiproliferative activity of phenylbutyrate ester of haloperidol metabolite II [(±)-MRJF4] in prostate cancer cells.

Complex mechanisms of prostate cancer progression prompt to novel therapeutic strategies concerning a combination of drugs or of single molecules able to interact with more crucial targets. Histone deacetylase inhibitors and sigma ligands with mixed σ(1) antagonist and σ(2) agonist properties were proposed as new potential tools for treatment of prostate cancer. (±)-MRJF4 was synthesized as phenylbutyrate ester of haloperidol metabolite II, which is a molecule consisting of a histone deacetilase inhibitor (4-phenylbutyric acid) and a sigma ligand (haloperidol metabolite II). Antiproliferatives activities of 4-phenylbutyric acid, haloperidol metabolite II, equimolar mixture of both compounds and (±)-MRJF4 were evaluated in vitro on LNCaP and PC3 prostate cancer cells. Preliminary binding studies of (±)-MRJF4 for σ(1), σ(2), D(2) and D(3) receptors and inhibition HDAC activity were reported. MTT cell viability assays highlighted a notable increase of antiproliferative activity of (±)-MRJF4 (IC(50) = 11 and 13 µM for LNCaP and PC3, respectively) compared to 4-phenylbutyric acid, haloperidol metabolite II and the respective equimolar pharmacological association. (±)-MRJF4 was also used in combination with σ(1) agonist (+)-pentazocine and σ(2) antagonist AC927 in order to evaluate the role of σ receptor subtypes in prostate cancer cell death.