Transplantation of hematopoietic progenitors in myelofibrosis.

The objective of this work is to generate recommendations on the management of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in primary myelofibrosis (PMF). A comprehensive systematic review of articles published between 1999 and 2015 (January) was used as a source of scientific evidence. The recommendations were produced through a Delphi process involving a panel of 23 experts appointed by the European LeukemiaNet and the European Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group. Key questions included patient selection, donor selection, pre-transplant management, conditioning regimen, post-transplant management, prevention, and management of post-transplant relapse. Patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk disease and age < 70 years should be considered candidates for allo-SCT. Patients with intermediate-risk 1 disease and age < 65 years should be considered candidates if they have refractory transfusion-dependent anemia, or a peripheral blood (PB) blast percentage > 2%, or adverse cytogenetics. Splenectomy before transplantation must be decided on a case-by-case basis. Patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk disease who lack a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling or unrelated donor should be enrolled in a protocol that uses HLA non-identical donors. PB was considered the most appropriate source of hematopoietic stem cells for transplants from HLA-matched unrelated donors and siblings. The optimal intensity of the conditioning regimen has yet to be defined. Strategies such as discontinuation of immunosuppressive drugs, infusion of donor lymphocytes, or both were considered adequate to prevent clinical relapse. In conclusion, we provide consensus-based recommendations aimed at optimizing allo-SCT in PMF. Unmet clinical needs were highlighted.

El objetivo de este trabajo es generar recomendaciones sobre el manejo del trasplante alogénico de células madre (alo-SCT) en la mielofibrosis primaria (MFP). Se utilizó una revisión sistemática integral de artículos publicados entre 1999 y 2015 (enero) como fuente de evidencia científica. Las recomendaciones se produjeron mediante un proceso Delphi en el que participó un panel de 23 expertos designados por la European LeukemiaNet y el European Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group. Las preguntas clave incluyeron la selección de pacientes, la selección de donantes, el manejo previo al trasplante, el régimen de acondicionamiento, el manejo posterior al trasplante, la prevención y el manejo de la recaída después del trasplante. Los pacientes con enfermedad de riesgo intermedio 2 o alto y edad < 70 años deben ser considerados candidatos para alo-SCT. Los pacientes con enfermedad de riesgo intermedio 1 y edad < 65 años deben ser considerados candidatos si presentan anemia refractaria dependiente de transfusiones, o un porcentaje de blastos en sangre periférica > 2%, o citogenética adversa. La esplenectomía previa al trasplante debe decidirse caso por caso. Los pacientes con enfermedad de riesgo intermedio 2 o alto que carecen de un hermano compatible con el antígeno leucocitario humano (HLA) o de un donante no emparentado deben inscribirse en un protocolo que utilice donantes no idénticos de HLA. PB se consideró la fuente más apropiada de células madre hematopoyéticas para trasplantes de hermanos y donantes no emparentados compatibles con HLA. La intensidad óptima del régimen de acondicionamiento aún debe definirse. Se consideraron adecuadas estrategias como la suspensión de los fármacos inmunosupresores, la infusión de linfocitos del donante o ambas para evitar la recaída clínica. En conclusión, proporcionamos recomendaciones basadas en consenso destinadas a optimizar el alo-SCT en MFP. Se destacaron las necesidades clínicas insatisfechas.

Essential thrombocythaemia.

Essential thrombocythemia (ET) is a chronic Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm that has its main involvement in the megakaryopoietic lineage, generating sustained thrombocytosis in peripheral blood and an increase in the number of mature megakaryocytes in the bone marrow. In addition to marked thrombocytosis, it is characterized by increased thrombotic or hemorrhagic risk and the presence of constitutional symptoms. Patients with ET have a low but known risk of disease progression to myelofibrosis and/or acute leukemia. The diagnosis is made based on the 2016 WHO criteria. At present, available treatments for patients with ET are mainly aimed at minimizing the risk of thrombosis and/or bleeding.

La trombocitemia esencial (TE) es una neoplasia mieloproliferativa crónica Filadelfia negativa que tiene su principal involucro en la línea megacariopoyética, generando trombocitosis sostenida en la sangre periférica y un incremento en el número de megacariocitos maduros en médula ósea. Además de una marcada trombocitosis, se caracteriza por un mayor riesgo trombótico o hemorrágico y la presencia de síntomas constitucionales. Los pacientes con TE tienen un riesgo bajo, pero conocido, de evolución de la enfermedad a mielofibrosis y/o leucemia aguda. El diagnóstico se realiza con base en los criterios de la Organización Mundial de la Salud del 2016. Los tratamientos actualmente disponibles para los pacientes con TE están dirigidos principalmente a minimizar el riesgo de trombosis y/o hemorragia.

Pregnancy in myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are associated with a significant risk of thrombosis and the hypercoagulable environment of pregnancy increases this risk. The most frequent gestational complications consist of spontaneous abortion, thrombosis, bleeding, and hypertensive disease of pregnancy. Treatment depends on thrombotic risk, gestational trimester, and myeloproliferative neoplasm.

Las neoplasias mieloproliferativas (NMP) están asociadas a un riesgo notable de trombosis y el entorno de hipercoagulabilidad propio del embarazo aumenta este riesgo. Las complicaciones gestacionales más frecuentes consisten en: aborto espontáneo, trombosis, sangrado y enfermedad hipertensiva del embarazo. El tratamiento depende del riesgo trombótico, trimestre gestacional y neoplasia mieloproliferativa.

Polycythemia vera.

Polycythemia vera (PV) is mainly characterized by erythrocytosis, thrombotic and hemorrhagic predisposition, a variety of symptoms, and cumulative risks of fibrotic progression and/or leukemic evolution over time. The diagnosis is made based on the 2016 WHO criteria. The treatment of PV focuses on rapidly reducing the erythrocyte mass, either by means of phlebotomies or with cytoreductive treatment, and the reduction of thrombotic risk by correcting cardiovascular risk factors and the use of platelet antiaggregants.

La policitemia vera (PV) se caracteriza principalmente por eritrocitosis, predisposición trombótica y hemorrágica, una variedad de síntomas y riesgos acumulativos de progresión fibrótica y/o evolución leucémica a lo largo del tiempo. El diagnóstico se realiza con base en los criterios de la Organización Mundial de la Salud del 2016. El tratamiento de la PV se centra en reducir rápidamente la masa eritrocitaria, ya sea por medio de flebotomías o con tratamiento citorreductor, y la disminución del riesgo trombótico mediante la corrección de factores de riesgo cardiovascular y el uso de antiagregantes plaquetarios.

Risks in invasive procedures.

Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms have an increased risk of thrombosis and bleeding. This risk must be identified, as well as individualizing the therapeutic strategy before invasive procedures; adequate cytoreduction reduces the risk of complications.

Los pacientes con neoplasias mieloproliferativas tienen un riesgo incrementado de trombosis y sangrado. Se debe identificar dicho riesgo, así como individualizar la estrategia terapéutica previo a los procedimientos invasivos; una adecuada citorreducción disminuye el riesgo de complicaciones.

Symptom control.

In addition to symptoms secondary to splenomegaly, microvascular abnormalities, and thrombohemorrhagic complications, patients with MPN may experience a significant symptom burden attributed to an increase in circulating inflammatory cytokines. These symptoms can be severe and limit quality of life. Therefore, in addition to the prevention of complications, one of the objectives of the treatment of MPN is the control of symptoms.

Además de la sintomatología secundaria a la esplenomegalia, a las alteraciones microvasculares y a las complicaciones trombohemorrágicas, los pacientes con neoplasias mieloproliferativas (NMP) pueden experimentar una importante carga sintomática atribuida a un aumento de citocinas inflamatorias circulantes. Estos síntomas pueden ser severos y limitar la calidad de vida. Por ello, además de la prevención de las complicaciones, uno de los objetivos del tratamiento de las NMP es el control de los síntomas.

Thrombotic events.

Major thrombotic complications in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) represent an important clinical problem due to their high morbidity, the complexity of their management, and their associated mortality. The appearance of a thrombosis implies a high thrombotic risk stratification of the MPN and determines the initiation or optimization of cytoreductive treatment and the use of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy as secondary prophylaxis. The incidence of thrombosis at the time of diagnosis is higher than during the course of the disease, being located in the arterial territory in 60-70% of cases. Once thrombosis has occurred, up to 20-33% of patients experience thrombotic recurrence in the same initial vascular territory.

Las complicaciones trombóticas mayores en las neoplasias mieloproliferativas (NMP) representan un importante problema clínico debido a su elevada morbilidad, la complejidad de su manejo y su mortalidad asociada. La aparición de una trombosis comporta una estratificación de alto riesgo trombótico de la NMP y determina el inicio o la optimización del tratamiento citorreductor y el uso de terapia antiplaquetaria o anticoagulante como profilaxis secundaria. La incidencia de trombosis en el momento del diagnóstico es mayor que durante la evolución de la enfermedad, localizándose en territorio arterial en el 60-70% casos. Una vez se ha producido una trombosis, hasta el 20-33% de los pacientes sufre una recurrencia trombótica en el mismo territorio vascular inicial.

First inter-institutional consensus on Chronic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

The objective of the consensus is to make available to the professionals of the different public health institutions in our country, who are in charge of these diseases, the most relevant and up-to-date information about their diagnosis and treatment in clinical practice. With this inter-institutional consensus we hope to contribute to improving the quality of care for patients with chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms throughout the Mexican Republic, to unify criteria in both diagnosis and treatment of the different myeloproliferative diseases.

OBJETIVO: El objetivo del consenso es poner a disposición de los profesionales de las diferentes instituciones de salud pública en nuestro país, quienes se encuentran a cargo de estas enfermedades, la información más relevante y actualizada acerca de su diagnóstico y tratamiento en la práctica clínica. Con este consenso interinstitucional esperamos contribuir a mejorar la calidad de la atención de los pacientes con neoplasias mieloproliferativas crónicas a todo lo ancho y largo de la República Mexicana, con el fin de unificar criterios tanto en diagnóstico como en tratamiento de las diferentes enfermedades mieloproliferativas.

Myelofibrosis: diagnosis and treatment.

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by clonal myeloproliferation, dysregulated kinase signaling, and release of abnormal cytokines. In recent years, important progress has been made in the knowledge of the molecular biology and the prognostic assessment of MF. Conventional treatment has limited impact on the patients' survival; it includes a wait-and-see approach for asymptomatic patients, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, androgens, or immunomodulatory agents for anemia, cytoreductive drugs such as hydroxyurea for the splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms, and splenectomy or radiotherapy in selected patients. The discovery of the Janus kinase (JAK) 2 mutation triggered the development of molecular targeted therapy of MF. The JAK inhibitors are effective in both JAK2-positive and JAK2-negative MF; one of them, ruxolitinib, is the current best available therapy for MF splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms. Although ruxolitinib has changed the therapeutic scenario of MF, there is no clear indication of a disease-modifying effect. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains the only curative therapy of MF, but due to its associated morbidity and mortality, it is usually restricted to eligible high- and intermediate-2-risk MF patients. To improve current therapeutic results, the combination of JAK inhibitors with other agents is currently being tested, and newer drugs are being investigated.

La mielofibrosis (MF) es una neoplasia mieloproliferativa negativa para BCR-ABL1 caracterizada por mieloproliferación clonal, señalización de cinasa desregulada y liberación de citocinas anormales. En los últimos años se han realizado importantes avances en el conocimiento de la biología molecular y la valoración pronóstica de la MF. El tratamiento convencional tiene un impacto limitado en la supervivencia de los pacientes; incluye un enfoque de espera para pacientes asintomáticos, agentes estimulantes de la eritropoyesis, andrógenos o agentes inmunomoduladores para la anemia, fármacos citorreductores como la hidroxiurea para la esplenomegalia y los síntomas constitucionales, y esplenectomía o radioterapia en pacientes seleccionados. El descubrimiento de la mutación Janus cinasa (JAK) 2 desencadenó el desarrollo de la terapia dirigida molecular de la MF. Los inhibidores de JAK son efectivos tanto en MF con JAK2 positivo como con JAK2 negativo; uno de ellos, el ruxolitinib, es la mejor terapia disponible actualmente para la esplenomegalia y los síntomas constitucionales de la MF. Sin embargo, aunque el ruxolitinib ha cambiado el escenario terapéutico de la MF, no hay indicios claros de un efecto modificador de la enfermedad. El alotrasplante de células madre sigue siendo la única terapia curativa de la MF, pero debido a su morbilidad y mortalidad asociadas, generalmente se restringe a pacientes elegibles con MF de riesgo alto e intermedio 2. Para mejorar los resultados terapéuticos actuales, actualmente se está probando la combinación de inhibidores de JAK con otros agentes y se están investigando fármacos más nuevos.

ALK-Negative Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma: Current Concepts and Molecular Pathogenesis of a Heterogeneous Group of Large T-Cell Lymphomas.

Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is a subtype of CD30+ large T-cell lymphoma (TCL) that comprises ~2% of all adult non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Based on the presence/absence of the rearrangement and expression of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), ALCL is divided into ALK+ and ALK-, and both differ clinically and prognostically. This review focuses on the historical points, clinical features, histopathology, differential diagnosis, and relevant cytogenetic and molecular alterations of ALK- ALCL and its subtypes: systemic, primary cutaneous (pc-ALCL), and breast implant-associated (BIA-ALCL). Recent studies have identified recurrent genetic alterations in this TCL. In systemic ALK- ALCL, rearrangements in DUSP22 and TP63 are detected in 30% and 8% of cases, respectively, while the remaining cases are negative for these rearrangements. A similar distribution of these rearrangements is seen in pc-ALCL, whereas none have been detected in BIA-ALCL. Additionally, systemic ALK- ALCL-apart from DUSP22-rearranged cases-harbors JAK1 and/or STAT3 mutations that result in the activation of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway. The JAK1/3 and STAT3 mutations have also been identified in BIA-ALCL but not in pc-ALCL. Although the pathogenesis of these alterations is not fully understood, most of them have prognostic value and open the door to the use of potential targeted therapies for this subtype of TCL.

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: clinical follow-up and analysis of sequential pathologic specimens of untreated patients shows persistent or progressive disease.

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is a distinctive type of T-cell lymphoma that arises around textured-surface breast implants. In a subset of patients, this disease can involve surrounding tissues, spread to regional lymph nodes, and rarely metastasize to distant sites. The aim of this study was to assess sequential pathologic specimens from patients with breast implant-associated ALCL to better understand the natural history of early-stage disease. To achieve this goal, we searched our files for patients who had breast implant-associated ALCL and who had undergone earlier surgical intervention with assessment of biopsy or cytologic specimens. We then focused on the patient subset in whom a definitive diagnosis was not established, and patients did not receive current standard-of-care therapy at that time. We identified a study group of ten patients with breast implant-associated ALCL in whom pathologic specimens were collected 0.5 to 4 years before a definitive diagnosis was established. A comparison of these serial biopsy specimens showed persistent disease without change in pathologic stage in three patients, progression in five patients, and persistence versus progression in two patients. Eventually, six patients underwent implant removal with complete capsulectomy and four underwent partial capsulectomy. Seven patients also received chemotherapy because of invasive disease, three of whom also received radiation therapy, two brentuximab vedotin after chemotherapy failure, and one allogeneic stem cell transplant. Eight patients achieved complete remission and two had partial remission after definitive therapy. At time of last follow-up, six patients were alive without disease, one had evidence of disease, one died of disease, and two patients died of unrelated cancers. In summary, this analysis of sequential specimens from patients with breast implant-associated ALCL suggests these neoplasms persist or progress over time if not treated with standard-of-care therapy.

What is the Process for Breast Implant Manufacturing? Inside Eight Breast Implant Factories.

BACKGROUND: With the recent association between breast implants and anaplastic large cell lymphoma, breast implants have become the focus of many warnings. Surgeons and health professionals are not involved in all the processes of the manufacturing and distribution of this product. Not all countries have breast implant factories that are easy for surgeons to visit and better understand the manufacturing process. METHODS: A questionnaire about breast implant manufacturing and distribution was validated in consensus and form. Two plastic surgeons visited eight factories and administered the questionnaire in the presence of a photographer, who documented that the questionnaire was answered in the same way for all visits. Once the visitors finished obtaining the information (questionnaire responses and video recording), this information was validated by a different member of a safety committee in Mexico. For the observations to be considered valid, the information from the questionnaire and the video must be presented. RESULTS: We visited eight factories: three in France (Sebbin, Arion and Eurosilicone), two in Costa Rica (Allergan and Motiva), one in Scotland (Nagor), one in Germany (Polytech) and one in Korea (Bellagel). In four factories (Eurosilicone, Motiva, Nagor and Sebbin), the information on the process for manufacturing an implant was observed and recorded (validated). The quality laboratory was visited, and video recording was performed in six factories (Bellagel, Eurosilicone, Motiva, Nagor, Polytech and Sebbin). CONCLUSION: It was possible to observe and verify that most of the companies that distribute breast implants in Mexico perform their manufacturing processes according to ISO standards. A breast implant registry can help people further understand how BIA-ALCL will behave in the future and allow more tests to better understand this pathology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Breast Prosthesis Syndrome: Pathophysiology and Management Algorithm.

The cosmetic use of devices like prostheses to increase breast volume is nothing new. It is calculated that millions of people have been exposed to silicone in several ways, including breast implants, and since 1964 there has been uncertainty regarding their safety. We did not find in the literature any studies that reported the appearance of a specific immunological disease in patients with silicone breast implants. Furthermore, there are also neither case-control studies nor reports of patients proving that symptoms of autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) occurred after the placement of silicone implants nor that the patients had pre-existing symptoms. Several studies link silicone to allergic reactions and the development of systemic autoimmune diseases; however, other studies deny this association. There are currently several theories about the effect of silicone on the body. One theory with greater acceptance proposes an adjuvant effect of silicone on the development of autoimmune diseases in genetically predisposed patients. However, the variety of symptoms occurring in patients who develop these pathologies leads to doubts about the relationship between the adjuvant effects of a silicone prosthesis may have with a specific autoimmune disease or a mix of these diseases. The lack of consensus on this topic obliges a full review of what has already been reported in the literature to integrate the knowledge and propose a focus for new research on this matter. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Bilateral Proximal Forearm Transplantation: Case Report at 7 Years.

BACKGROUND: Although return of function has been reported in patients undergoing proximal forearm transplantations (PFTs), reports of long-term function are limited. In this study, we evaluated the clinical progress and function 7 years postoperatively in a patient who underwent bilateral PFT. CASE PRESENTATION: A 58-year-old man underwent bilateral PFT in May 2012. Transplantation involved all of the flexor and extensor muscles of the forearm. Neurorrhaphies of the median, ulnar, and radial nerves were epineural and 7 cm proximal to the elbow. Immunosuppressive maintenance medications during the first 3 years postoperatively were tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and steroids, and later, tacrolimus, sirolimus, and steroids. Forearm function was evaluated annually using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; Carroll; Hand Transplantation Score System; Short Form-36; and Kapandji scales. We also evaluated his grip and pinch force. RESULTS: Postoperatively, the patient developed hypertriglyceridemia and systemic hypertension. He experienced 6 acute rejections, and none were resistant to steroids. Motor function findings in his right/left hand were: grip strength: 10/13 kg; key pinch: 3/3 kg; Kapandji score: 6/9 of 10; Carroll score: 66/80; Hand Transplantation Score System score: 90/94. His preoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 50 versus 18, postoperatively; his Short Form-36 score was 90. This function improved in relation with the function reported in the second year. CONCLUSIONS: Seven years following PFT, the patient gained limb strength with a functional elbow and wrist, although with diminished digital dexterity and sensation. Based on data presented by other programs and our own experience, PFT is indicated for select patients.

What is the Evidence of Lymphoma in Patients with Prostheses Other Than Breast Implants?

INTRODUCTION: Medical devices such as hip, knee, breast, vascular prostheses, among others, are very useful in different pathologies. We cannot doubt that their use is a great tool, besides being an advance in medicine; they provide a change in the quality of life of many patients; however, they are not exempt from adverse reactions and events. METHODS: We conduct a systematic review about lymphoma in the presences of prostheses other than breast implants. RESULTS: We selected 21 publications with a total of 24 patients. The largest number of prostheses was related to long bones in a total of 13 prostheses. The most frequent symptoms were: pain (52%), inflammation (24%), visible or palpable mass 20%. The most frequent type of lymphoma was non-Hodgkin B cell lymphoma in 14 cases. DISCUSSION: The presence of microparticles make biological degradation and wear of the implants, with macrophage and lymphocyte activation and the consequent production of proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin-1ß, interleukin-6, and prostaglandin 2 (PGE2). CONCLUSION: Lymphoma is not a common disease in patients with prostheses, and more data are needed to identify risk factors and make proper diagnoses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Bone marrow findings in blast phase of polycythemia vera.

Approximately 10% of patients with polycythemia vera (PV) transform to acute leukemia (blast phase) at 10 years after initial diagnosis of PV. The bone marrow pathologic, cytogenetic, and molecular features of blast phase have not been well characterized. In this study, we reviewed 422 PV patients over a period of 11 years and identified 58 patients who developed acute myeloid leukemia (blast phase) during the course of disease. We found that blast phase of PV was characterized by overt myelodysplasia (n = 51, 88%); moderate to severe myelofibrosis (33 of 45, 73%); an abnormal karyotype (n = 51, 88%) that was often complex karyotype (n = 42, 72%); and gene mutations involving TP53 (55%), TET2 (27%), and DNMT3A (25%). Patients with blast phase of PV had an aggressive clinical course, with a median overall survival of 4 months after onset of blast phase. Eleven patients had close follow-up from polycythemic phase to blast phase: Four patients showed dysplastic changes in the polycythemic phase, and three of them transformed to blast phase without a "middle phase" of post-PV myelofibrosis.We conclude that blast phase of PV is characterized by myelodysplasia, moderate to severe fibrosis, a high frequency of an abnormal and often complex karyotype, and frequentTP53mutation.

Clinical implications of cytogenetic heterogeneity in multiple myeloma patients with TP53 deletion.

TP53 deletion (ΔTP53) in myeloma is known to be a high-risk finding associated with poorer prognosis. The prognostic impact of underlying cytogenetic heterogeneity in patients with myeloma associated with ΔTP53 is unknown. We studied 90 patients with myeloma associated with ΔTP53 identified by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization and assessed the impact of karyotype and coexisting alterations of IGH, RB1, and CKS1B. There were 54 men and 36 women with a median age of 59 years (range 38-84); 14 patients had a normal karyotype (NK/ΔTP53), 73 had a complex karyotype (CK/ΔTP53), and 3 had a non-complex abnormal karyotype. Patients with CK/ΔTP53 showed a significantly poorer overall survival compared with patients with NK/ΔTP53 (P=0.0243). Furthermore, in the CK/ΔTP53 group, patients with IGH rearrangement other than t(11;14)(q13;q32)/CCND1-IGH, designated as adverse-IGH, had an even worse outcome (P=0.0045). In contrast, RB1 deletion, CKS1B gain, ploidy, additional chromosome 17 abnormalities, or ΔTP53 clone size did not impact prognosis. Stem cell transplant did not improve overall survival in either the NK/ΔTP53 or CK/ΔTP53 (P=0.8810 and P=0.1006) groups, but tandem stem cell transplant did improve the overall survival of patients with CK/ΔTP53 (P=0.0067). Multivariate analysis confirmed in this cohort that complex karyotype (hazard ratio 1.976, 95% CI 1.022-3.821, P=0.043), adverse-IGH (hazard ratio 3.126, 95% CI 1.192-8.196, P=0.020), and tandem stem cell transplant independently correlate with overall survival (hazard ratio 0.281, 95% CI 0.091-0.866, P=0.027). We conclude that comprehensive genetic assessment adds to TP53 status in the risk stratification of myeloma patients.

Characteristics and clinical significance of cytogenetic abnormalities in polycythemia vera.

Up to 20% of patients with polycythemia vera have karyotypic abnormalities at the time of the initial diagnosis. However, the cytogenetic abnormalities in polycythemia vera have not been well characterized and their prognostic impact is largely unknown. In this study, we aimed to address these issues using a large cohort of polycythemia vera patients with cytogenetic information available. The study included 422 patients, 271 in polycythemic phase, 112 with post-polycythemic myelofibrosis, 11 in accelerated phase, and 28 in blast phase. Abnormal karyotypes were detected in 139 (33%) patients, ranging from 20% in those in the polycythemic phase to 90% among patients in accelerated/blast phase. Different phases harbored different abnormalities: isolated del(20q), +8 and +9 were the most common abnormalities in the polycythemic phase; del(20q) and +1q were the most common abnormalities in post-polycythemic myelofibrosis; and complex karyotypes were the most common karyotypes in accelerated and blast phases. Patients with an abnormal karyotype showed a higher frequency of disease progression, a shorter transformation-free survival and an inferior overall survival compared with patients with a normal karyotype in the same disease phase. Cytogenetics could be effectively stratified into three risk groups, low- (normal karyotype, sole +8, +9 and other single abnormality), intermediate- (sole del20q, +1q and other two abnormalities), and high-risk (complex karyotype) groups. We conclude that cytogenetic changes in polycythemia vera vary in different phases of disease, and carry different prognostic impacts.

Additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations are associated with inferior clinical outcome in patients with hyperdiploid multiple myeloma: a single-institution experience.

Multiple myeloma is cytogenetically heterogeneous and a hyperdiploid karyotype is considered currently to have standard risk. In this study, we investigated the clinical impact of additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations assessed by chromosome analysis in 284 patients with a hyperdiploid karyotype that were subdivided into four groups based on the complexity of additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations: group 1, no additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations (n=35); group 2, one additional-structural-chromosomal aberration (n=46); group 3, two additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations (n=39); group 4, ≥three additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations (n=164). Clinicopathological data among these groups showed no differences, except patients in group 1 had higher hemoglobin (P=0.031) and albumin (P=0.045) levels. The median follow-up was 55 months (range, 3-221). The median overall survival of patients in groups 1-4 was negatively correlated with the number of the additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations: 98, 76, 61, and 48 months, respectively (P<0.0001). In group 4, CKS1B gain, RB1, or TP53 deletions had no additional impact on overall survival; however, trisomy 3 or 15 conferred a much better overall survival, and monosomy 13 and 14 predicted a worse outcome. In addition, the overall survival of patients in groups 3 and 4 was similar to a subset of high-risk multiple myeloma cases (n=21) (P=0.387). About 192 (67.6%) patients who received stem cell transplantation did not show improved overall survival compared with non-stem cell transplantation patients (n=92; P=0.142) overall; however, they did show significantly improved overall survival in patients with refractory disease in group 4 (P=0.0084). Multivariate analysis showed that two or more additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations (P<0.0001), stages (P=0.02 and P=0.002) and relapsed disease (P=0.009) negatively impacted the overall survival. We conclude that hyperdiploid karyotypes in multiple myeloma are associated with additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations and a greater number of additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations predicts poorer clinical outcome. A hyperdiploid karyotype with ≥2 additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations at chromosomal level should be considered an independent high-risk factor.