Brimonidine-timolol fixed combination induced granulomatous inflammation of the eye.

We report on two cases of granulomatous conjunctivitis and uveitis related with the use of a brimonidine-timolol fixed combination. Case report and a review of medical literature. A 64-year-old man was diagnosed with marked granulomatous uveitis and a 57-year-old woman was diagnosed with granulomatous conjunctivitis. Both patients were using a topical fixed combination of brimonidine 0.2 %-timolol 0.5 % for open angle glaucoma. Bilateral granulomatous uveitis and conjunctivitis were diagnosed after 16 months of treatment with a fixed combination of brimonidine-timolol in both cases. Granulomatous inflammation resolved with the cessation of antiglaucomatous drugs and topical corticosteroid treatment. When the inflammation had resolved completely, both patients were rechallenged with topical brimonidine in one eye only to determine causality. Conjunctival hyperemia is a common side effect of glaucoma medications and is sometimes overlooked. Hyperemia may be associated with other signs such as iritis and keratic precipitates or conjunctival inflammation. In such cases, granulomatous inflammation may be considered in the differential diagnosis. The fixed-combination of brimonidine-timolol may cause this clinical picture.

Staining of the internal limiting membrane with the use of heavy brilliant blue G.

BACKGROUND: Brilliant blue G (BBG) is frequently used in chromovitrectomy to facilitate internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling. A study was initiated to evaluate if heavy BBG is safe and effective in staining the ILM. METHODS: We studied 30 eyes, 23 with idiopathic macular holes and 7 of patients with diabetic macular edema. Removal of the ILMs was assisted by heavy BBG staining. In cases with histopathological correlation the ILMs were evaluated with hematoxylin and eosin, Masson's trichrome, periodic acid-Schiff and glial fibrillary acidic protein staining. In addition, immunohistochemistry was also performed using specific antibodies for vimentin, neuron-specific enolase, factor VIII and CD68. Using the Image-Pro Plus software of Media Cybernetics Co. we found an average thickness in ILMs. RESULTS: Of the ILM specimens sent, 19/30 (63.33%) could not be processed properly because of the limited sample material, recognizing only fragments of dispersed fibrillar material. In macular hole ILMs we found an average thickness of 1.3 ± 0.65 µm, and in diabetic macular edema ILMs an average thickness of 6.2 ± 1.4 µm. CONCLUSIONS: In heavy BBG-assisted ILM peeling we observed no intraoperative or postoperative complications after a mean follow-up of 12 months. Heavy BBG could be an effective and safe vehicle for staining the ILM.