Oral pimonidazole unveils clinicopathologic and epigenetic features of hypoxic tumour aggressiveness in localized prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Tumor hypoxia is associated with prostate cancer (PCa) treatment resistance and poor prognosis. Pimonidazole (PIMO) is an investigational hypoxia probe used in clinical trials. A better understanding of the clinical significance and molecular alterations underpinning PIMO-labeled tumor hypoxia is needed for future clinical application. Here, we investigated the clinical significance and molecular alterations underpinning PIMO-labeled tumor hypoxia in patients with localized PCa, in order to apply PIMO as a prognostic tool and to identify potential biomarkers for future clinical translation. METHODS: A total of 39 patients with localized PCa were recruited and administered oral PIMO before undergoing radical prostatectomy (RadP). Immunohistochemical staining for PIMO was performed on 37 prostatectomy specimens with staining patterns evaluated and clinical association analyzed. Whole genome bisulfite sequencing was performed using laser-capture of microdissected specimen sections comparing PIMO positive and negative tumor areas. A hypoxia related methylation molecular signature was generated by integrating the differentially methylated regions with previously established RNA-seq datasets. RESULTS: Three PIMO staining patterns were distinguished: diffuse, focal, and comedo-like. The comedo-like staining pattern was more commonly associated with adverse pathology. PIMO-defined hypoxia intensity was positively correlated with advanced pathologic stage, tumor invasion, and cribriform and intraductal carcinoma morphology. The generated DNA methylation signature was found to be a robust hypoxia biomarker, which could risk-stratify PCa patients across multiple clinical datasets, as well as be applicable in other cancer types. CONCLUSIONS: Oral PIMO unveiled clinicopathologic features of disease aggressiveness in localized PCa. The generated DNA methylation signature is a novel and robust hypoxia biomarker that has the potential for future clinical translation.

A real-world analysis of clinical outcomes in AML with myelodysplasia-related changes: a comparison of ICC and WHO-HAEM5 criteria.

ABSTRACT: The proposed fifth edition of the World Health Organization classification of hematolymphoid tumors (WHO-HAEM5) and International Consensus Classification (ICC) provide different definitions of acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related genetics (AML-MR). We conducted a retrospective study which included a cohort of 432 patients, with 354 patients fulfilling WHO-HAEM5 criteria for WHO-AML-MR or 276 patients fulfilling ICC criteria for ICC-AML-MR by gene mutation or cytogenetics (ICC-AML-MR-M/CG). The clinicopathological features were largely similar, irrespective of the classification used, except for higher rates of complex karyotype, monosomy 17, TP53 mutations, and fewer RUNX1 mutations in the WHO-AML-MR group. TP53 mutations were associated with distinct clinicopathological features and dismal outcomes (hazard ratio [HR], 2.98; P < .001). ICC-AML-MR-M/CG group had superior outcome compared with the WHO-AML-MR group (HR, 0.80, P = .032), largely in part due to defining TP53 mutated AML as a standalone entity. In the intensively-treated group, WHO-AML-MR had significantly worse outcomes than AML by differentiation (HR, 1.97; P = .024). Based on ICC criteria, ICC-AML-MR-M/CG had more inferior outcomes compared to AML not otherwise specified (HR, 2.11; P = .048 and HR, 2.55; P = .028; respectively). Furthermore, changing the order of genetic abnormalities defining AML-MR (ie, by gene mutations or cytogenetics) did not significantly affect clinical outcomes. ICC-AML-MR-M/CG showed similar outcomes regardless of the order of assignment. We propose to harmonize the 2 classifications by excluding TP53 mutations from WHO-HAEM5 defined AML-MR group and combining AML-MR defined by gene mutations and cytogenetics to form a unified group.

AML with CEBPA mutations: A comparison of ICC and WHO-HAEM5 criteria in patients with 20% or more blasts.

AML with CEBPA mutation and AML with in-frame bZIP CEBPA mutations define favorable-risk disease entities in the proposed 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification (WHO-HAEM5) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC), respectively. However, the impact of these new classifications on clinical practice remains unclear. We sought to assess the differences between the ICC and WHO-HAEM5 for AML with CEBPA mutation. 741 AML patients were retrospectively analyzed. Cox proportional-hazard regression was used to identify factors predictive of outcome. A validation cohort from the UK-NCRI clinical trials was used to confirm our findings. 81 (11%) AML patients had CEBPA mutations. 39 (48%) patients met WHO-HAEM5 criteria for AML with CEBPA mutation, among which 30 (77%) had biallelic CEBPA mutations and 9 (23%) had a single bZIP mutation. Among the 39 patients who met WHO-HAEM5 criteria, 25 (64%) also met ICC criteria. Compared to patients only meeting WHO-HAEM5 criteria, patients with in-frame bZIP CEBPA mutations (ie. meeting both WHO-HAEM5 and ICC criteria) were younger, had higher bone marrow blast percentages and CEBPA mutation burden, infrequently harboured 2022 ELN high-risk genetic features and co-mutations in other genes, and had superior outcomes. The associations in clinicopathological features and outcomes between the CEBPA-mutated groups were validated in the UK-NCRI cohort. Our study indicates that in-frame bZIP CEBPA mutations are the critical molecular aberrations associated with favorable outcomes in AML patients treated with curative intent chemotherapy. Compared to WHO-HAEM5, the ICC identifies a more homogenous group of CEBPA-mutated AML patients with favorable outcomes.

TP53 Mutations in AML Patients Are Associated with Dismal Clinical Outcome Irrespective of Frontline Induction Regimen and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

TP53 mutations are associated with extremely poor outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The outcomes of patients with TP53-mutated (TP53MUT) AML after different frontline treatment modalities are not well established. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a potentially curative procedure for AML; however, long-term outcomes among patients with TP53MUT AML after allo-HCT are dismal, and the benefit of allo-HCT remains controversial. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of patients with TP53MUT AML after treatment with different frontline induction therapies and allo-HCT. A total of 113 patients with TP53MUT AML were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with TP53MUT AML who received intensive or azacitidine-venetoclax induction had higher complete remission rates compared to patients treated with other hypomethylating-agent-based induction regimens. However, OS and EFS were not significantly different among the induction regimen groups. Allo-HCT was associated with improved OS and EFS among patients with TP53MUT AML; however, allo-HCT was not significantly associated with improved OS or EFS in time-dependent or landmark analysis. While the outcomes of all patients were generally poor irrespective of therapeutic strategy, transplanted patients with lower TP53MUT variant allele frequency (VAF) at the time of diagnosis had superior outcomes compared to transplanted patients with higher TP53 VAF. Our study provides further evidence that the current standards of care for AML confer limited therapeutic benefit to patients with TP53 mutations.

Molecular characterization of AML-MRC reveals TP53 mutation as an adverse prognostic factor irrespective of MRC-defining criteria, TP53 allelic state, or TP53 variant allele frequency.

BACKGROUND: Acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) generally confers poor prognosis, however, patient outcomes are heterogeneous. The impact of TP53 allelic state and variant allele frequency (VAF) in AML-MRC remains poorly defined. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 266 AML-MRC patients who had NGS testing at our institution from 2014 to 2020 and analyzed their clinical outcomes based on clinicopathological features. RESULTS: TP53 mutations were associated with cytogenetic abnormalities in 5q, 7q, 17p, and complex karyotype. Prognostic evaluation of TP53MUT AML-MRC revealed no difference in outcome between TP53 double/multi-hit state and single-hit state. Patients with high TP53MUT variant allele frequency (VAF) had inferior outcomes compared to patients with low TP53MUT VAF. When compared to TP53WT patients, TP53MUT patients had inferior outcomes regardless of MRC-defining criteria, TP53 allelic state, or VAF. TP53 mutations and elevated serum LDH were independent predictors for inferior OS and EFS, while PHF6 mutations and transplantation were independent predictors for favorable OS and EFS. NRAS mutation was an independent predictor for favorable EFS. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that TP53MUT AML-MRC defines a very-high-risk subentity of AML in which novel therapies should be explored.

NPM1-mutated AML-MRC diagnosed on the basis of history of MDS or MDS/MPN frequently harbours secondary-type mutations and confers inferior outcome compared to AML with mutated NPM1.

BACKGROUND: Acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) is a prognostically diverse disease. Owing to its favourable prognosis, AML-MRC with mutated NPM1 (NPM1MUT) diagnosed on the basis of multi-lineage dysplasia has been reclassified into "AML with mutated NPM1". However, it remains unclear if NPM1MUT AML with antecedent MDS or MDS/MPN (AML-MRC-H) should also be reclassified into this subentity. The mutational landscape of NPM1MUT AML-MRC-H remains poorly defined. METHODS: The clinicopathological features, molecular profiles and outcomes of 241 AML-MRC-H and 332 normal karyotype (NK)-AML with mutated NPM1 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Fisher's exact test, chi-square test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to compare clinicopathological and molecular features. Overall survival and event-free survival were compared using the log-rank test. Multivariable survival analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: 33 (14%) AML-MRC-H patients had an NPM1 mutation. By NGS, NPM1MUT AML-MRC-H patients had a significantly higher frequency of secondary-type mutations in U2AF1 and ASXL1 compared to NK-AML with mutated NPM1. NPM1MUT AML-MRC-H was significantly associated with inferior outcomes compared to NK-AML with mutated NPM1. Bone marrow transplantation had a favourable prognostic impact in NPM1MUT AML-MRC-H. CONCLUSIONS: NPM1MUT AML-MRC-H has inferior prognosis compared to NK-AML with mutated NPM1, likely due to the higher frequency of secondary-type mutations, and thus should still be included in the high-risk subentity of AML-MRC. NPM1MUT AML-MRC patients may benefit from bone marrow transplantation.