Tenecteplase versus Alteplase before thrombectomy: A comprehensive evaluation of clinical and angiographic impact: Insights from the ETIS registry.

INTRODUCTION: Data on prior use of Tenecteplase versus Alteplase in acute stroke management by mechanical thrombectomy are controversial. Our primary objective was to make a comprehensive comparative assessment of clinical and angiographic efficacy and safety outcomes in a large prospective observational study. METHODS: We included stroke patients who were eligible for intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy between 2019 and 2021, from an ongoing registry in twenty comprehensive stroke centers in France. We divided patients into two groups based on the thrombolytic agent used (Alteplase vs Tenecteplase). We then compared their treatment times, and their angiographic (TICI scale), clinical (mRS at three months and sICH) and safety outcomes after controlling for potential confounders using propensity score methods. RESULTS: We evaluated 1131 patients having undergone thrombectomy for the final analysis, 250 received Tenecteplase and 881 Alteplase. Both groups were of the same median age (75 vs 74 respectively), and had the same baseline NIHSS score (16) and ASPECTS (8). There was no significant difference for First Pass Effect (OR 0.93, 95 % CI 0.76-1.14, p = 0.75), time required for reperfusion (OR 0.03, 95 % CI 0.09-0.16, p = 0.49), or for final reperfusion status. Clinically, functional independence at 90 days was similar in both groups (OR 0.82, 95 % CI 0.61-1.10, p = 0.18) with the same risk of sICH (OR 1.36, 95 % CI 0.77-2.41, p = 0.28). However, Tenecteplase patients had shorter imaging-to-groin puncture times (99 vs 142 min, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Tenecteplase showed no better clinical or angiographic impact on thrombectomy compared to Alteplase. Nevertheless, it appeared associated with a shorter thrombolysis-to-groin puncture time.

Neurological Manifestations of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Hospitalized Patients: A Lebanese Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Concerns regarding potential neurologic complications of COVID-19 are being increasingly reported worldwide. Our objective was to investigate the neurologic complications of COVID-19 among a cohort of Lebanese patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to Rafik Hariri University Hospital (RHUH), the leading COVID-19 testing and treatment center in Lebanon. METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-center, observational study conducted from March to July 2020 at RHUH, Lebanon. RESULTS: Of 169 hospitalized patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (mean {SD} age was 45.75 {19} years and 62.7% were men), 91 patients (53.8%) had severe infection and 78 patients (46.2%) had non-severe infection according to the American Thoracic Society guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia. Overall, 112 patients (66.3%) developed neurologic symptoms: CNS (46.1%), PNS (43.7%), and skeletal muscle injury (2.4%). Compared with patients with non-severe infection, patients with severe infection were significantly older, were male and more likely to have underlying disorders, especially diabetes and cardiac or cerebrovascular disease. Moreover, those patients experienced more typical COVID-19 symptoms at onset of illness such as fever, cough and fatigue. However, there was no significant difference in the frequency of all nervous system manifestations between the severe and the non-severe infection groups (57 {62.6%} vs 55 {70.5%}; p =0.316), except for impaired consciousness, where seven patients had impaired consciousness in the severe group compared to none in the non-severe group (p=0.012). CONCLUSION: A wide variety of neurologic symptoms were detected in our Lebanese cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. A comprehensive knowledge of the neurologic manifestations will help healthcare providers to be more attentive to these complications.