Validity and reliability of the health-related questionnaire IBDQ-32 in Mexican patients with inflammatory bowel disease / Validez y confiabilidad del cuestionario relacionado con la salud IBDQ-32 en pacientes mexicanos con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease comprises two conditions: ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire 32 (IBDQ-32) is a specific questionnaire which has been translated from English into Spanish and validated. In the Spanish-speaking countries of America it has not been validated. The aim was to determine the psychometric properties, validity and reliability of the Mexican version of the IBDQ-32 questionnaire. Methods: A total of 316 patients with inflammatory bowel disease and 100 healthy controls participated in the study. The questionnaires IBDQ-32 and SF-36 were issued on two occasions (separated by 15 days). The psychometric properties of the Mexican version of the IBDQ-32 questionnaire were determined. Results: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease had an impaired quality of life compared to healthy controls. There were no differences between ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease in the total scores of IBDQ-32 and its domains. The internal consistency reliability was good. The intraclass coefficient showed good reliability (repeated measurement) for total scale and all four subscales. Factor analysis explained variance is higher than 50% therefore is considered adequate/acceptable. The correlation between IBDQ-32 and SF-36 showed a satisfactory association. The social domain is the only one that presented a ceiling effect. Conclusions: The Mexican version of the IBDQ-32 quality of life questionnaire is valid and reliable. This sample included the entire spectrum of inflammatory disease (remission and activity) and was comparable when assessing quality of life with the SF-36 generic questionnaire.(AU)

Antecedentes: La enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal comprende dos afecciones: colitis ulcerosa y enfermedad de Crohn. El Cuestionario de enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal 32 (IBDQ-32) es un cuestionario específico que ha sido traducido del inglés al español y validado. En los países de habla hispana de América no ha sido validado. El objetivo fue determinar las propiedades psicométricas, validez y confiabilidad de la versión mexicana del cuestionario IBDQ-32. Métodos: Participaron en el estudio un total de 316 pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal y 100 controles sanos. Los cuestionarios IBDQ-32 y SF-36 se aplicaron en dos ocasiones (separadas por 15 días). Se determinaron las propiedades psicométricas de la versión mexicana del cuestionario IBDQ-32. Resultados: Los pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal tenían una calidad de vida deteriorada, en comparación con los controles sanos. No hubo diferencias en las puntuaciones totales de IBDQ-32 y sus dominios entre la colitis ulcerosa y la enfermedad de Crohn. La confiabilidad de la consistencia interna fue buena. El coeficiente intraclase mostró buena confiabilidad (medición repetida) para la escala total y las cuatro subescalas. La varianza explicada del análisis factorial es superior al 50%, por lo que se considera adecuada/aceptable. La correlación entre IBDQ-32 y SF-36 mostró una asociación satisfactoria. El dominio social es el único que presentó un efecto techo. Conclusiones: La versión mexicana del cuestionario de calidad de vida IBDQ-32 es válida y confiable. Esta muestra incluyó todo el espectro de la enfermedad inflamatoria (remisión y actividad) y fue comparable al evaluar la calidad de vida con el cuestionario genérico SF-36.(AU)

Gene expression profiling of inflammatory cytokines in esophageal biopsies of different phenotypes of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The clinical endoscopic phenotypes of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are classified as Barrett's esophagus (BE), erosive esophagitis (EE) and non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (NERD). NERD is subclassified as abnormal acid exposure (AAE) and normal acid exposure (NAE) based on pH monitoring study results. The aim of this study was to characterize genes involved in the pathophysiology and immune response of GERD. METHODS: This is an observational and cross-sectional study. All patients with BE, EE, AAE, and NAE and a control group were subjected to superior endoscopy (with biopsies of esophageal mucosa). Relative mRNA quantification of cytokine and target genes was conducted by quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR). Changes in the expression of genes associated with inflammation were assessed for each disease phenotype. Statistical analysis of differential gene expression was performed using the Mann-Whitney U non-parametric test. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients were included and were divided into the following groups: Group BE, 16 (19.51%); Group EE, 23 (28.04%); Group AAE, 13 (15.86%); NAE 13 (15.86%); and Control Group, 17 (20.73%). Compared with the control group, patients with BE exhibited increased IL-8 expression (p < 0.05) and increased levels of IL-10, MMP-3, and MMP-9. Patients with EE exhibited increased levels of IL-1B, IL-6 and IL-10 (p < 0.05), and patients with AAE exhibited increased expression of IL-1B, IL-6, IFN-γ and TNF-α (p < 0.05). AAE exhibited increased IL-1B and TNF-α expression compared with NAE (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the differential expression of mediators of inflammation in the esophageal mucosa of patients with different GERD endoscopic phenotypes. IL-1B and TNF-α could be useful to differentially diagnose AAE and NAE in the non-erosive phenotype using endoscopic biopsies.

Validity and reliability of the health-related questionnaire IBDQ-32 in Mexican patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease comprises two conditions: ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire 32 (IBDQ-32) is a specific questionnaire which has been translated from English into Spanish and validated. In the Spanish-speaking countries of America it has not been validated. The aim was to determine the psychometric properties, validity and reliability of the Mexican version of the IBDQ-32 questionnaire. METHODS: A total of 316 patients with inflammatory bowel disease and 100 healthy controls participated in the study. The questionnaires IBDQ-32 and SF-36 were issued on two occasions (separated by 15 days). The psychometric properties of the Mexican version of the IBDQ-32 questionnaire were determined. RESULTS: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease had an impaired quality of life compared to healthy controls. There were no differences between ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease in the total scores of IBDQ-32 and its domains. The internal consistency reliability was good. The intraclass coefficient showed good reliability (repeated measurement) for total scale and all four subscales. Factor analysis explained variance is higher than 50% therefore is considered adequate/acceptable. The correlation between IBDQ-32 and SF-36 showed a satisfactory association. The social domain is the only one that presented a ceiling effect. CONCLUSIONS: The Mexican version of the IBDQ-32 quality of life questionnaire is valid and reliable. This sample included the entire spectrum of inflammatory disease (remission and activity) and was comparable when assessing quality of life with the SF-36 generic questionnaire.

Esophageal hypomotility and spastic motor disorders: current diagnosis and treatment.

Esophageal hypomotility (EH) is characterized by abnormal esophageal peristalsis, either from a reduction or absence of contractions, whereas spastic motor disorders (SMD) are characterized by an increase in the vigor and/or propagation velocity of esophageal body contractions. Their pathophysiology is not clearly known. The reduced excitation of the smooth muscle contraction mediated by cholinergic neurons and the impairment of inhibitory ganglion neuronal function mediated by nitric oxide are likely mechanisms of the peristaltic abnormalities seen in EH and SMD, respectively. Dysphagia and chest pain are the most frequent clinical manifestations for both of these dysfunctions, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is commonly associated with these motor disorders. The introduction of high-resolution manometry (HRM) and esophageal pressure topography (EPT) has significantly enhanced the ability to diagnose EH and SMD. Novel EPT metrics in particular the development of the Chicago Classification of esophageal motor disorders has enabled improved characterization of these abnormalities. The first step in the management of EH and SMD is to treat GERD, especially when esophageal testing shows pathologic reflux. Smooth muscle relaxants (nitrates, calcium channel blockers, 5-phosphodiesterase inhibitors) and pain modulators may be useful in the management of dysphagia or pain in SMD. Endoscopic Botox injection and pneumatic dilation are the second-line therapies. Extended myotomy of the esophageal body or peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) may be considered in highly selected cases but lack evidence.