Leptomeningeal involvement by prostate carcinoma an ominous head of a well-known Hydra.

A 67-year-old male patient presents to the hospital complaining of severe nausea and vomiting failing oral antiemetics. He carries the history of initial diagnosis of stage III prostate cancer. He underwent radical prostatectomy followed by external beam radiation. After 5 years of initial excellent control with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), imaging study showed retroperitoneal adenopathy denoting ADT failure. His prostate-specific antigen continued to rise while on enzalutamide and then abiraterone reflecting disease progression. He maintained excellent functional capacity through 23 cycles of docetaxel however he started developing hip pain after the last cycle with imaging studies suggesting new hip metastatic disease. Following the first cycle of radium-223, the patient presented with intractable nausea and vomiting. MRI showed a high suspicion of leptomeningeal spread which was confirmed through a meningeal biopsy after lumbar puncture showed negative results. The patient had excellent symptomatic response to high-dose dexamethasone. After receiving whole-brain radiation, the patient opted to be on best supportive care and succumbed to his illness 3 months later.

Condyloma Acuminata Presenting as Isolated Papillary Lesions in the Prostatic Urethra.

BACKGROUND A condyloma acuminatum is a sexually transmitted, human papillomavirus (HPV) associated, neoplasm. In men, it is predominantly found on external genitalia and rarely progresses more proximally than the distal penile urethra. Condyloma acuminata of the prostatic urethra are rare and are usually seen as an extension of, or in association with external lesions. Therefore, it is not typically considered in the differential diagnosis of isolated papillary lesions limited to the prostatic urethra. CASE REPORT A 62-year-old male with rheumatoid arthritis treated with abatacept presented to urology due to a history of intermittent bladder self-catheterization for urinary obstruction. He underwent a transurethral resection of the prostate and had incidental findings of papillary lesions restricted to the prostatic urethra that were presumed to be urothelial carcinoma. Microscopic examination established the diagnosis of condyloma acuminata, and low-risk HPV 6 and 11 were detected by in-situ hybridization. Subsequent cystoscopy showed marked growth and extension of condyloma acuminata to near the external meatus. After multiple treatments with intraurethral 5-fluorouracil, several small lesions remained in the bulbous urethra. With follow up for 2 years since diagnosis, the patient has not developed external condylomata. CONCLUSIONS A condyloma acuminatum might present as an isolated papillary growth in the prostatic urethra without clinical or historical evidence of a visible lesion on external genitalia. Immunosuppression and/or urethral instrumentation might be a risk factor for such a presentation. Urologists and pathologists should be aware of this rare possibility in order to avoid misdiagnosis, and ensure that the patient receives appropriate therapy.