Responsiveness of stem-like human glioma cells to all-trans retinoic acid and requirement of retinoic acid receptor isotypes α, ß and γ.

Retinoic acid (RA) is required for development and homeostasis of the normal mammalian brain and may play a role in the initiation and progression of malignant brain tumors, such as the glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and the gliosarcoma (Gsarc). The subpopulation of stem-like glioma cells (SLGCs) was shown to resist standard glioma radio-/chemotherapy and to propagate tumor regrowth. We used phenotypically distinct, self-renewing SLGC lines from six human GBMs, two Gsarcs, and two subcloned SLGC derivatives in order to investigate their responsiveness to all-trans retinoic acid (atRA) and to identify the RA-receptor (RAR) isotypes involved. In general, atRA exerted a pro-proliferative and pro-survival effect on SLGCs, though the efficacy was distinct. By means of RAR isotype-selective retinoids we disclosed that these effects were mediated by RARα and RARγ, except for one SLGC line, in which the pro-proliferative signal was induced by the RARß-selective retinoid. Only one GBM-derived cell line (T1338) and a subpopulation of another (T1389) displayed neural differentiation in response to atRA. Differentiation of T1338 was induced by RARα and RARγ isotype-selective retinoids, associated with down-regulation of Sox2, and the failure to induce orthotopic tumors in the brains of SCID mice. The differential responsiveness of the SLGC lines appeared unrelated to the expression of RARß, as (i) atRA augmented RAR isotype mRNA expression and particularly rarß mRNA in all SLGC lines, (ii) rarß promoter hypomethylation in the SLGC lines was not related to differentiation and (iii) the induction of T1338 differentiation was by RARα- and RARγ-selective ligands.

The biologic lower detection limit of six ultrasensitive PSA assays.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of monitoring patients with prostate cancer (PCA) by ultrasensitive measurement of prostate specific antigen (PSA) is frequently discussed. Usually, the analytic lower detection limit of an ultrasensitive assay is determined by the manufacturer. As the analytic lower detection limit does not take into account interfering factors of human serum, the biologic lower detection limit, which is defined as PSA concentration detected in PSA-free human serum, plus 3 standard deviations, is of greater interest. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated the biologic lower detection limit of six ultrasensitive PSA assays. Sera from 15 men with bladder cancer after radical cystoprostatectomy and from 30 healthy women were applied. Hence, we expected no PSA of prostatic origin. RESULTS: The biologic lower detection limit obtained using these sera was up to 30 fold higher (men, 0.29-0.63 ng/ml; women, 0.03-0.69 ng/ml) than the analytic lower detection limit (0.01-0.09 ng/ml). CONCLUSIONS: PSA measurement in sera obtained from men without prostate and women results in PSA values above the ultrasensitive range. Therefore, advantages provided by ultrasensitive PSA measurement in monitoring PCA patients after radical prostatectomy are limited.

Different classes of coactivators recognize distinct but overlapping binding sites on the estrogen receptor ligand binding domain.

We have analyzed interaction of coactivators with the wild-type estrogen receptor alpha (ER), HEG0, and a mutant, L536P-HEG0, which is constitutively active in several transiently transfected cells and a HeLa line that stably propagates an estrogen-sensitive reporter gene. Different classes of coactivators do not recognize the ER ligand binding domain (LBD) in the same manner. Steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1), amplified in breast cancer-1 (AIB-1), transcriptional intermediary factor-1 (TIF-1), transcriptional intermediary factor-2 (TIF-2), and receptor interacting protein 140 (RIP140) interacted with HEG0 and L536P-HEG0 in the presence of estradiol, but generally not in the presence of anti-estrogens. However, ICI164,384 stimulated some interaction of RIP140 with LBDs. SRC-1, AIB-1, and RIP140 interacted constitutively with the L536P ER, whereas TIF-1 and TIF-2 interacted only weakly in the absence of hormone. Reciprocal competition for binding to the ER LBD was observed between different classes of coactivators. Moreover, coexpression of RIP140 blocked enhanced transactivation by HEG0 observed in the presence of TIF-2, suggesting that RIP140 may play a negative role in ER signaling. We conclude that constitutive activity of L536P-HEG0 is manifested to similar degrees in different cell types and likely arises from constitutive coactivator binding; different classes of coactivators recognize distinct but overlapping binding sites on the ER LBD. Finally, the observation that L536P-HEG0 interacted constitutively with AIB-1, a coactivator that has been implicated in ER signaling in breast and ovarian cancer, suggests that similar mutations in the ER may contribute to hormone-independent proliferation of breast and ovarian cells.

A mutation mimicking ligand-induced conformational change yields a constitutive RXR that senses allosteric effects in heterodimers.

Mutations of a single residue in the retinoid X receptor alpha (RXRalpha) ligand-binding pocket (LBP) generate constitutive, ligand-binding-competent mutants with structural and functional characteristics similar to those of agonist-bound wild-type RXR. Modelling of the mouse RXRalphaF318A LBP suggests that, like agonist binding, the mutation disrupts a cluster of van der Waals interactions that maintains helix H11 in the apo-receptor location, thereby shifting the thermodynamic equilibrium to the holo form. Heterodimerization with some apo-receptors (retinoic acid, thyroid hormone and vitamin D3 receptors) results in 'silencing' of RXRalphaF318A constitutive activity, which, on the other hand, efficiently contributes to synergistic transactivation within NGFI-B-RXR heterodimers. RAR mutants disabled for corepressor binding and/or lacking a functional AF-2 activation domain, do not relieve RXR 'silencing'. Not only RAR agonists, but also the RAR antagonist BMS614 induce conformational changes allowing RXR to exert constitutive (RXRalphaF318A) or agonist-induced (wild-type RXR) activity in heterodimers. Interestingly, the RXRalphaF318A constitutive activity generated within heterodimers in the presence of BMS614 requires the integrity of both RXR and RAR AF-2 domains. These observations suggest that, within RXR-RAR heterodimers, RAR can adopt a structure distinct from that of the active holo-RAR, thus allowing RXR to become transcriptionally responsive to agonists.

Comparison of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measured by four combinations of free PSA and total PSA assays.

We compared prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assay systems [i.e., free PSA (f-PSA) and the corresponding total PSA (t-PSA) assay] from four different manufacturers as well as the f-PSA/t-PSA ratios with regard to their ability to discriminate between benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer (PCA). ROC analysis showed similar areas under the curves (AUCs) with different assay systems. For the entire patient population the AUCs of the f-PSA/t-PSA ratio were not or slightly increased compared with the sole measurement of t-PSA (t-PSA, 0.792-0.820; f-PSA/t-PSA ratio, 0.685-0.859). In contrast, for only those patients who showed t-PSA concentrations within the diagnostic gray area of 4-25 micrograms/L t-PSA, the AUCs were greater for the f-PSA/ t-PSA ratio than for measurement of t-PSA alone (t-PSA, 0.608-0.647; f-PSA/t-PSA ratio, 0.690-0.806). These results were confirmed by the predictive values of the negative results (NPVs) of the t-PSA assays and the f-PSA/t-PSA ratios (assay thresholds corresponding to a 95% detection limit). Compared with the sole t-PSA measurement there was no mentionable increase in the NPVs due to the f-PSA/t-PSA ratio for the entire patient population, but an increase up to 49% when limited to t-PSA concentrations within 4-25 micrograms/L. We therefore conclude that the f-PSA/t-PSA ratio may be helpful for differential diagnosis of BPH and PCA within the diagnostic gray area of 4-25 micrograms/L t-PSA.

Impact of free prostate-specific antigen on discordant measurement results of assays for total prostate-specific antigen.

OBJECTIVES: To determine why various assays for total PSA (t-PSA) produce discordant results in identical serum samples. METHODS: A total of 84 sera from 40 patients with histologically confirmed benign prostatic hyperplasia and from 44 patients with untreated prostate cancer were analyzed with seven assays for t-PSA and the Hybritech research assay for free prostate-specific antigen (f-PSA). Comparison between assays was performed by linear regression of the t-PSA concentrations as well as between the t-PSA concentrations and the f/t-PSA ratios. RESULTS: The coefficients of correlation for the investigated assays versus Hybritech Tandem-E range from 0.96 to 0.99. Nevertheless average PSA concentrations differed significantly from the Tandem-E assay in all assays. Despite a good correlation, some assays showed a regression line with a slope notably different from 1. In these assays, elevated concentrations were observed in sera with a high proportion of f-PSA. CONCLUSIONS: The study illustrates a significant and clinically relevant discordance between reported t-PSA concentrations for identical samples, depending on the assay used and on the contents of f-PSA in the sample. The interpretation of t-PSA concentrations requires awareness of the applied assay as well as the establishment of an assay-specific reference range in order to avoid inappropriate clinical consequences, such as unnecessary biopsies. Respective details must be contained in the laboratory reports. A change of assays without specifically reassessing previously valid reference ranges or the uncritical use of a customarily applied limit of < 4 ng/mL will otherwise be harmful to the patient.

TIF2, a 160 kDa transcriptional mediator for the ligand-dependent activation function AF-2 of nuclear receptors.

Nuclear receptors (NRs) act as ligand-inducible transcription factors which regulate the expression of target genes upon binding to cognate response elements. The ligand-dependent activity of the NR activation function AF-2 is believed to be mediated to the transcription machinery through transcriptional mediators/intermediary factors (TIFs). We report here the cloning of the 160 kDa human nuclear protein TIF2, which exhibits all properties expected for a mediator of AF-2: (i) it interacts in vivo with NRs in an agonist-dependent manner; (ii) it binds directly to the ligand-binding domains (LBDs) of NRs in an agonist- and AF-2-integrity-dependent manner in vitro; (iii) it harbours an autonomous transcriptional activation function; (iv) it relieves nuclear receptor autosquelching; and (v) it enhances the activity of some nuclear receptor AF-2s when overexpressed in mammalian cells. TIF2 exhibits partial sequence homology with the recently isolated steroid receptor coactivator SRC-1, indicating the existence of a novel gene family of nuclear receptor transcriptional mediators.

Ligand-dependent interaction of nuclear receptors with potential transcriptional intermediary factors (mediators).

The activity of the ligand-inducible activation function 2 (AF-2) contained in the ligand binding domain (LBD) of nuclear receptors (NRs) is thought to be mediated by transcriptional intermediary factors (TIFs). We have recently reported the isolation and characterization of two novel mouse proteins, designated TIF1 and mSUG1, that interact in a ligand-dependent fashion with the LBD (region E) of several NRs in vivo as well as in vitro. Remarkably, these interactions require the conserved core motif of the AF-2 activating domain (AF-2 AD) and can be blocked by AF-2 antagonists. TIF1 and mSUG1 might therefore represent TIFs/mediators for the ligand-dependent AF-2 of NRs. By comparing the interaction properties of these two putative TIFs with different NRs including the oestrogen (ER), thyroid hormone (TR), vitamin D3 (VDR), retinoic acid (RAR alpha) and retinoid X (RXR) receptors, we demonstrate that: (i) RXR alpha efficiently interacts with TIF1, but not with mSUG1, whereas TR alpha interacts much more efficiently with mSUG1 than with TIF1, and RAR alpha, VDR and ER efficiently interact with both TIF1 and mSUG1; (ii) the amphipathic alpha helix core of AF-2 AD is differentially involved in the interactions of RAR alpha with TIF1 and mSUG1; and (iii) the AF-2 AD cores of RAR alpha and ER are similarly involved in their interaction with TIF1, but not with mSUG1. Thus the interaction interfaces between the various NRs and either TIF1 or mSUG1 may vary depending on the nature of both the receptor and the putative mediator of its AF-2 function. We discuss the possible roles of TIF1 and mSUG1 as mediators of the transcriptional activity of the AF-2 of NRs.

Differential ligand-dependent interactions between the AF-2 activating domain of nuclear receptors and the putative transcriptional intermediary factors mSUG1 and TIF1.

Using a yeast two-hybrid system we report the isolation of a novel mouse protein, mSUG1, that interacts with retinoic acid receptor alpha (RAR alpha) both in yeast cells and in vitro in a ligand- and AF-2 activating domain (AF-2 AD)-dependent manner and show that it is a structural and functional homologue of the essential yeast protein SUG1. mSUG1 also efficiently interacts with other nuclear receptors, including oestrogen (ER), thyroid hormone (TR), Vitamin D3 (VDR) and retinoid X (RXR) receptors. By comparing the interaction properties of these receptors with mSUG1 and TIF1, we demonstrate that: (i) RXR alpha efficiently interacts with TIF1, but not with mSUG1, whereas TR alpha interacts much more efficiently with mSUG1 than with TIF1, and RAR alpha, VDR and ER efficiently interact with mSUG1 and TIF1; (ii) the amphipathic alpha-helix core of the AF-2 AD is differentially involved in interactions of RAR alpha with mSUG1 and TIF1; (iii) the AF-2 AD cores of RAR alpha and ER are similarly involved in their interaction with TIF1, but not with mSUG1. Thus, the interaction interfaces between the different receptors and either mSUG1 or TIF1 may vary depending on the nature of the receptor and the putative mediator of its AF-2 function. We discuss the possibility that mSUG1 and TIF1 may mediate the transcriptional activity of the AF-2 of nuclear receptors through different mechanisms.

The N-terminal part of TIF1, a putative mediator of the ligand-dependent activation function (AF-2) of nuclear receptors, is fused to B-raf in the oncogenic protein T18.

Nuclear receptors (NRs) bound to response elements mediate the effects of cognate ligands on gene expression. Their ligand-dependent activation function, AF-2, presumably acts on the basal transcription machinery through intermediary proteins/mediators. We have isolated a mouse nuclear protein, TIF1, which enhances RXR and RAR AF-2 in yeast and interacts in a ligand-dependent manner with several NRs in yeast and mammalian cells, as well as in vitro. Remarkably, these interactions require the amino acids constituting the AF-2 activating domain conserved in all active NRs. Moreover, the oestrogen receptor (ER) AF-2 antagonist hydroxytamoxifen cannot promote ER-TIF1 interaction. We propose that TIF1, which contains several conserved domains found in transcriptional regulatory proteins, is a mediator of ligand-dependent AF-2. Interestingly, the TIF1 N-terminal moiety is fused to B-raf in the mouse oncoprotein T18.

Dimerization interfaces formed between the DNA binding domains determine the cooperative binding of RXR/RAR and RXR/TR heterodimers to DR5 and DR4 elements.

We have previously reported that the binding site repertoires of heterodimers formed between retinoid X receptor (RXR) and either retinoic acid receptor (RAR) or thyroid hormone receptor (TR) bound to response elements consisting of directly repeated PuG(G/T)TCA motifs spaced by 1-5 bp [direct repeat (DR) elements 1-5] are highly similar to those of their corresponding DNA binding domains (DBDs). We have now mapped the dimerization surfaces located in the DBDs of RXR, RAR and TR, which are responsible for cooperative interaction on DR4 (RXR and TR) and DR5 (RXR and RAR). The D-box of the C-terminal CII finger of RXR provides one of the surfaces which is specifically required for the formation of the heterodimerization interfaces on both DR4 and DR5. Heterodimerization with the RXR DBD on DR5 specifically requires the tip of the RAR CI finger as the complementary surface, while a 7 amino acid sequence encompassing the 'prefinger region', but not the TR CI finger, is specifically required for efficient dimerization of TR and RXR DBDs on DR4. Importantly, DBD swapping experiments demonstrate not only that the binding site repertoires of the full-length receptors are dictated by those of their DBDs, but also that the formation of distinct dimerization interfaces between the DBDs are the critical determinants for cooperative DNA binding of these receptors to specific DRs.

The dimerization interfaces formed between the DNA binding domains of RXR, RAR and TR determine the binding specificity and polarity of the full-length receptors to direct repeats.

Heterodimers of retinoid X receptor (RXR) and retinoic acid receptor (RAR) bind preferentially to directly repeated elements with spacing of two (DR2) or five (DR5) base pairs, due to the specific heterocooperative interaction of their DNA binding domains (DBDs) on these elements. We have demonstrated in the accompanying paper that the heterodimeric DBD interface that is responsible for the cooperative binding to DR5 elements, specifically involves the D-box of the RXR CII finger and the tip of the RAR CI finger. We show here that a second type of dimerization interface, which specifically implicates the RAR T-box and the RXR CII finger to the exclusion of the D-box, determines the selective binding to DR2 elements. Interestingly, the same type of dimerization interface (RXR T-box and CII finger) is responsible for the cooperative binding of homodimers of the RXR DBD to DR1 elements. Based on the three-dimensional structure of the glucocorticoid receptor DBD, modeling of RXR/RAR, RXR/TR and RXR/RXR DBD cooperative interactions predicts that in all cases the DBD contributing the CII finger, i.e. that of RXR, has to be positioned 5' to its cooperatively bound partner. This binding polarity of the DBDs is conferred upon the full-length receptors, since crosslinking experiments indicate that RXR is always 5' to RAR in complexes between either DR5 or DR2 and RXR/RAR heterodimers. The possible significance of these observations for transactivation by retinoic acid receptors is discussed.

Expression of genes related to the human erbB, erbA, pdgf and pdgf-r in tumors of different etiology in Xiphophorus.

The melanoma determining Tu locus of the teleost Xiphophorus contains an accessory gene, x-erbB*a, which is closely related to the EGF receptor gene family, and is probably oncogenic. x-erbB*a exists in allelic forms that are specific for distinct Tu-loci, and shows high homology to a non-allelic non-oncogenic counterpart x-erbB*i which is transcribed into mRNA of 4.6 kb in non-tumorous and tumorous tissues of fish harboring and lacking Tu. Expression of a 4.0-kb mRNA in tumors (melanoma and fibrosarcoma) of different etiology is strictly correlated with the inheritance of X. maculatus x-erbB*a alleles; transcripts of 8.0 kb were detected in melanoma and carcinoma of fish harboring a certain x-erbB*a of X. variatus. The expression of the putative x-erbB*a transcripts parallels the stage of malignancy of the tumor. The expression of the xiphophorine EGF receptor gene (x-erbB) was detected in almost all tumors, is strongly enhanced in carcinoma, and is positively correlated with the degree of malignancy of melanoma and fibrosarcoma. Some tumors show expression of erbA-related genes. The PDGF receptor mRNA is expressed in all tumors analyzed and shows enhanced expression in malignant tumors of neurogenic, epithelial and mesenchymal origin. Expression of x-pdgf was observed in several cases of melanoma, but more frequently in carcinoma and fibrosarcoma. We conclude that x-erbB*a might be involved in initiation of tumors of different cellular origin and etiology in fish harboring Tu, as well as in the determination of the malignancy of the tumor. Furthermore, we assume that x-erbB*i, x-erbB, x-pdgf and x-pdgf-r play a role in secondary events in tumorigenesis by, e.g., conferring a selective growth advantage to the tumor cells.