Mechanisms of neutralization of toxSAS from toxin-antitoxin modules.

Toxic small alarmone synthetase (toxSAS) enzymes constitute a family of bacterial effectors present in toxin-antitoxin and secretion systems. toxSASs act through either translation inhibition mediated by pyrophosphorylation of transfer RNA (tRNA) CCA ends or synthesis of the toxic alarmone adenosine pentaphosphate ((pp)pApp) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) depletion, exemplified by FaRel2 and FaRel, respectively. However, structural bases of toxSAS neutralization are missing. Here we show that the pseudo-Zn2+ finger domain (pZFD) of the ATfaRel2 antitoxin precludes access of ATP to the pyrophosphate donor site of the FaRel2 toxin, without affecting recruitment of the tRNA pyrophosphate acceptor. By contrast, (pp)pApp-producing toxSASs are inhibited by Tis1 antitoxin domains though occlusion of the pyrophosphate acceptor-binding site. Consequently, the auxiliary pZFD of AT2faRel is dispensable for FaRel neutralization. Collectively, our study establishes the general principles of toxSAS inhibition by structured antitoxin domains, with the control strategy directly coupled to toxSAS substrate specificity.

TisB protein is the single molecular determinant underlying multiple downstream effects of ofloxacin in Escherichia coli.

Bactericidal antibiotics can cause metabolic perturbations that contribute to antibiotic-induced lethality. The molecular mechanism underlying these downstream effects remains unknown. Here, we show that ofloxacin, a fluoroquinolone that poisons DNA gyrase, induces a cascade of metabolic changes that are dependent on an active SOS response. We identified the SOS-regulated TisB protein as the unique molecular determinant responsible for cytoplasmic condensation, proton motive force dissipation, loss of pH homeostasis, and H2O2 accumulation in Escherichia coli cells treated with high doses of ofloxacin. However, TisB is not required for high doses of ofloxacin to interfere with the function of DNA gyrase or the resulting rapid inhibition of DNA replication and lethal DNA damage. Overall, the study sheds light on the molecular mechanisms by which ofloxacin affects bacterial cells and highlights the role of the TisB protein in mediating these effects.

Are envelope stress responses essential for persistence to ß-lactams in Escherichia coli?

Bacterial persistence to antibiotics defines the ability of small sub-populations of sensitive cells within an isogenic population to survive high doses of bactericidal antibiotics. Here, we investigated the importance of the five main envelope stress responses (ESRs) of Escherichia coli in persistence to five bactericidal ß-lactam antibiotics by combining classical time-kill curve experiments and single-cell analysis using time-lapse microscopy. We showed that the survival frequency of mutants for the Bae, Cpx, Psp, and Rcs systems treated with different ß-lactams is comparable to that of the wild-type strain, indicating that these ESRs do not play a direct role in persistence to ß-lactams. Since the σE-encoding gene is essential, we could not directly test its role. Using fluorescent reporters to monitor the activation of ESRs, we observed that σE is induced by high doses of meropenem. However, the dynamics of σE activation during meropenem treatment did not reveal any difference in persister cells compared to the bulk of the population, indicating that σE activation is not a hallmark of persistence. The Bae, Cpx, Psp, and Rcs responses were neither induced by ampicillin nor by meropenem. However, pre-induction of the Rcs system by polymyxin B increased survival to meropenem in an Rcs-dependent manner, suggesting that this ESR might confer some yet uncharacterized advantages during meropenem treatment or at the post-antibiotic recovery step. Altogether, our data suggest that ESRs are not key actors in E. coli persistence to ß-lactams in the conditions we tested.

The structure of DarB in complex with RelNTD reveals nonribosomal activation of Rel stringent factors.

Rel stringent factors are bifunctional ribosome-associated enzymes that catalyze both synthesis and hydrolysis of the alarmones (p)ppGpp. Besides the allosteric control by starved ribosomes and (p)ppGpp, Rel is regulated by various protein factors depending on specific stress conditions, including the c-di-AMP-binding protein DarB. However, how these effector proteins control Rel remains unknown. We have determined the crystal structure of the DarB2:RelNTD2 complex, uncovering that DarB directly engages the SYNTH domain of Rel to stimulate (p)ppGpp synthesis. This association with DarB promotes a SYNTH-primed conformation of the N-terminal domain region, markedly increasing the affinity of Rel for ATP while switching off the hydrolase activity of the enzyme. Binding to c-di-AMP rigidifies DarB, imposing an entropic penalty that precludes DarB-mediated control of Rel during normal growth. Our experiments provide the basis for understanding a previously unknown mechanism of allosteric regulation of Rel stringent factors independent of amino acid starvation.

Structure of SpoT reveals evolutionary tuning of catalysis via conformational constraint.

Stringent factors orchestrate bacterial cell reprogramming through increasing the level of the alarmones (p)ppGpp. In Beta- and Gammaproteobacteria, SpoT hydrolyzes (p)ppGpp to counteract the synthetase activity of RelA. However, structural information about how SpoT controls the levels of (p)ppGpp is missing. Here we present the crystal structure of the hydrolase-only SpoT from Acinetobacter baumannii and uncover the mechanism of intramolecular regulation of 'long'-stringent factors. In contrast to ribosome-associated Rel/RelA that adopt an elongated structure, SpoT assumes a compact τ-shaped structure in which the regulatory domains wrap around a Core subdomain that controls the conformational state of the enzyme. The Core is key to the specialization of long RelA-SpoT homologs toward either synthesis or hydrolysis: the short and structured Core of SpoT stabilizes the τ-state priming the hydrolase domain for (p)ppGpp hydrolysis, whereas the longer, more dynamic Core domain of RelA destabilizes the τ-state priming the monofunctional RelA for efficient (p)ppGpp synthesis.

Bistable Expression of a Toxin-Antitoxin System Located in a Cryptic Prophage of Escherichia coli O157:H7.

Type II toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems are classically composed of two genes that encode a toxic protein and a cognate antitoxin protein. Both genes are organized in an operon whose expression is autoregulated at the level of transcription by the antitoxin-toxin complex, which binds operator DNA through the antitoxin's DNA-binding domain. Here, we investigated the transcriptional regulation of a particular TA system located in the immunity region of a cryptic lambdoid prophage in the Escherichia coli O157:H7 EDL933 strain. This noncanonical paaA2-parE2 TA operon contains a third gene, paaR2, that encodes a transcriptional regulator that was previously shown to control expression of the TA. We provide direct evidence that the PaaR2 is a transcriptional regulator which shares functional similarities to the lambda CI repressor. Expression of the paaA2-parE2 TA operon is regulated by two other transcriptional regulators, YdaS and YdaT, encoded within the same region. We argue that YdaS and YdaT are analogous to lambda Cro and CII and that they do not constitute a TA system, as previously debated. We show that PaaR2 primarily represses the expression of YdaS and YdaT, which in turn controls the expression of paaR2-paaA2-parE2 operon. Overall, our results show that the paaA2-parE2 TA is embedded in an intricate lambdoid prophage-like regulation network. Using single-cell analysis, we observed that the entire locus exhibits bistability, which generates diversity of expression in the population. Moreover, we confirmed that paaA2-parE2 is addictive and propose that it could limit genomic rearrangements within the immunity region of the CP-933P cryptic prophage. IMPORTANCE Transcriptional regulation of bacterial toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems allows compensation of toxin and antitoxin proteins to maintain a neutral state and avoid cell intoxication unless TA genes are lost. Such models have been primarily studied in plasmids, but TAs are equally present in other mobile genetic elements, such as transposons and prophages. Here, we demonstrate that the expression of a TA system located in a lambdoid cryptic prophage is transcriptionally coupled to the prophage immunity region and relies on phage transcription factors. Moreover, competition between transcription factors results in bistable expression, which generates cell-to-cell heterogeneity in the population, but without, however, leading to any detectable phenotype, even in cells expressing the TA system. We show that despite the lack of protein sequence similarity, this locus retains major lambda prophage regulation features.