Acyclovir-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Adults with Viral Encephalitis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of parenteral Acyclovir-induced Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) in patients with viral encephalitis. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Neurology, Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, from January to December 2021. METHODOLOGY: A total of 89 suspected and proven cases of encephalitis receiving IV Acyclovir were collated. All had extensive medical histories and underwent CSF studies with +/- brain imaging. CSF routine and viral PCR were done. Acyclovir-induced AKI was defined as a rise in serum creatinine of >0.3 mg/dl in 48 h or by ≥1.5 times the baseline value, and its severity was staged into 1 (risk), 2 (injury), and 3 (failure) according to the KDIGO guidelines (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury Work Group, 2012). Patients' variables, including age, gender, presenting features, comorbid conditions, and CSF findings, were divided into two groups, i.e. with and without AKI. RESULTS: This research included 89 patients with a mean age of 48 years. AKI occurred in 34 patients (38.2%). The frequency of AKI with Stage 1 was 24%, Stage 2 was 44%, and Stage 3 was 32%; approximately two-thirds of cases were in Stage 2 and 3 (p >0.05). Five patients (5.6%) from Stage 3, required dialysis. CONCLUSION: AKI is an important adverse effect of parenteral acyclovir, which necessitates its early identification and timely management. Renal function monitoring is essential for patients on Acyclovir treatment as they are at risk for AKI. KEY WORDS: Acyclovir, Acute kidney injury, Viral encephalitis, Creatinine, Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes.

Behaviour change interventions to reduce second-hand smoke exposure at home in pregnant women - a systematic review and intervention appraisal.

BACKGROUND: Second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure during pregnancy is associated with poor pregnancy and foetal outcomes. Theory-based behaviour change interventions (BCI) have been used successfully to change smoking related behaviours and offer the potential to reduce exposure of SHS in pregnant women. Systematic reviews conducted so far do not evaluate the generalisability and scalability of interventions. The objectives of this review were to (1) report the BCIs for reduction in home exposure to SHS for pregnant women; and (2) critically appraise intervention-reporting, generalisability, feasibility and scalability of the BCIs employed. METHODS: Standard methods following PRISMA guidelines were employed. Eight databases were searched from 2000 to 2015 in English. The studies included used BCIs on pregnant women to reduce their home SHS exposure by targeting husbands/partners. The Workgroup for Intervention Development and Evaluation Research (WIDER) guidelines were used to assess intervention reporting. Generalisability, feasibility and scalability were assessed against criteria described by Bonell and Milat. RESULTS: Of 3479 papers identified, six studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies found that BCIs led to increased knowledge about SHS harms, reduction or husbands quitting smoking, and increased susceptibility and change in level of actions to reduce SHS at home. Two studies reported objective exposure measures, and one reported objective health outcomes. The studies partially followed WIDER guidelines for reporting, and none met all generalisability, feasibility and scalability criteria. CONCLUSIONS: There is a dearth of literature in this area and the quality of studies reviewed was moderate to low. The BCIs appear effective in reducing SHS, however, weak study methodology (self-reported exposure, lack of objective outcome assessment, short follow-up, absence of control group) preclude firm conclusion. Some components of the WIDER checklist were followed for BCI reporting, scalability and feasibility of the studies were not described. More rigorous studies using biochemical and clinical measures for exposures and health outcomes in varied study settings are required. Studies should report interventions in detail using WIDER checklist and assess them for generalisability, feasibility and scalability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD40125026666.