Facelift Surgery after Permanent Filler: Outcomes after Removal of Permanent Filler under Local Anesthesia.

Permanent fillers were previously used to fix wrinkles associated with aging as they were considered a reasonable choice for facial rejuvenation. However, the subsequent removal of permanent fillers is of great concern to surgeons before performing a facelift surgery. Many studies have evaluated the outcomes of facelift surgery; however, we sought to evaluate the outcomes of facelift surgery which required removal of fillers beforehand. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the outcomes of 50 patients with regard to patient satisfaction and postoperative complications of facelift surgery with removal of permanent filler under local anesthesia. A short scar rhytidectomy with superficial muscular aponeurotic system plication was performed. Preoperative and postoperative photographs were analyzed by two independent surgeons to report asymmetry scores ranging from one to three (one none, two slight, and three obvious asymmetries). Patient satisfaction scores were also recorded. Results: The preoperative presentations of the permanent filler were asymmetry (82%) and disfiguring facial edema (26%). Removing fillers under local anesthesia is generally tolerable, with 56% of patients tolerating rhytidectomy. The degree of the participants' satisfaction after follow-up was satisfactory; two-thirds of patients (62%) were satisfied. There was a significant difference between surgeons' preoperative and postoperative assessment of asymmetry scores (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Permanent filler removal with concomitant face-neck lift surgery has satisfactory outcomes. The procedure length was primarily determined by the patient's skin characteristics and the severity of the local condition.

Outcome comparison between thoracodorsal artery perforator flap and muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap in axillary reconstruction after hidradenitis suppurativa excision.

BACKGROUND: Thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flap and muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi (MSLD) flap have been frequently used for axillary coverage after hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) excision. However, none showed superiority to others. This study compared both flaps to define the ideal option, highlighting flap outcomes and functional and aesthetic results. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to compare both flaps that were used for axillary reconstruction in nine patients with bilateral HS Hurley stage III between 2017 and 2020. Eight TDAP and 10 MSLD flaps underwent functional evaluation using shoulder abduction angle (SA); the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score; visual analog scale (VAS) for pain; and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaires. Aesthetic assessment included the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale and arm-chest interval. RESULTS: The mean operating time was 194.4 ± 51.58 and 128.5 ± 31.45 min for TDAP and MSLD (p = .009), respectively. Flap complications were significantly higher in the TDAP group (p = .034). There was no significant difference between both groups regarding SA; DASH, DLQI, VAS, and SCAR scale (p > .05). The mean arm-chest interval was significantly longer in the MSLD than in the TDAP group by 6.9 mm (p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: TDAP and MSLD are comparable versatile flaps to eradicate axillary HS with higher TDAP flap complications. Although the TDAP flap is less bulky than the MSLD flap, the MSLD flap shortens the harvesting time without a significant difference in functional outcomes and scar results.

True and Average Internal Nasal Valve Area in Septorhinoplasty: Radiological and Clinical Outcomes.

The internal nasal valve provides most of the upper airway resistance; therefore, many surgical techniques have been developed to reconstruct and widen this sensitive area of the nasal airway. Twenty patients participated in this study to compare the effects of 2 techniques (spreader grafts and modified spreader flap) on the true valve area and the average valve area after rhinoplasty according to standard axial computed tomography on admission and 6 months following the surgery. The mean follow-up time was 10.2 months. After rhinoplasty, the average valve area increased in all patients who underwent the spreader graft or modified spreader flap techniques. The preoperative average valve areas for patients undergoing the spreader graft and spreader flap techniques were (37.10 ± 16.45 mm) and (36.86 ± 10.56 mm), respectively, whereas the postoperative results were (48.58 ± 12.85 mm) for those who underwent the spreader graft technique and (56.22 ± 19.06 mm) for those who underwent the modified spreader flap technique. Both techniques resulted in significant radiological and clinical improvement with a good correlation between the subjective and objective tests. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Surgically-assisted abdominal wall blocks for analgesia after abdominoplasty: A prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Abdominoplasty is a common aesthetic procedure. The transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) and rectus sheath block (RSB) have proven efficacy as analgesic modality for abdominal surgeries. This study demonstrates post-abdominoplasty analgesic duration consequent to the three surgically infiltrated local anesthetic techniques: bilateral TAPB, bilateral RSB, and subcutaneous infiltration (SCI) of 0.25% bupivacaine. METHODS: In this prospective randomized study, 48 adult patients scheduled for abdominoplasty were randomized into three groups: TAPB group (n = 16), RSB group (n = 16), and SCI group (n = 16) utilizing 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine for each block. In both TAPB and RSB groups, the block was performed bilaterally after plication of anterior abdominal wall, while in SCI group, the surgical incisional area was infiltrated before skin closure. Main outcome measures included visual analogue scale (VAS), at rest and during movement; the analgesic duration; and the total required doses of morphine in the first postoperative day. RESULTS: A statistically significant longer analgesia was recorded in the TABP group compared with both the RSB and SCI groups. Statistically significant higher VAS scores in the SCI group 4 hours postoperatively was recorded, both at rest and during movement, compared with both TABP and RSB groups. Significant higher morphine consumption in the SCI group was compared with the other two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among the surgically infiltrated anesthetic techniques for abdominoplasty, bilateral TAPB was associated with longer postoperatively analgesic duration with lower morphine consumption in the first 24 hours compared with RSB and SCI.