Urine-Derived Stem Cells for Regenerative Medicine: Basic Biology, Applications, and Challenges.

Regenerative medicine based on stem cell research has the potential to provide advanced health care for human beings. Recent studies demonstrate that stem cells in human urine can serve as an excellent source of graft cells for regenerative therapy, mainly due to simple, low-cost, and noninvasive cell isolation. These cells, termed human urine-derived stem cells (USCs), are highly expandable and can differentiate into various cell lineages. They share many biological properties with mesenchymal stem cells, such as potent paracrine effects and immunomodulation ability. The advantage of USCs has motivated researchers to explore their applications in regenerative medicine, including genitourinary regeneration, musculoskeletal repair, skin wound healing, and disease treatment. Although USCs have showed many positive outcomes in preclinical studies, and although the possible applications of USCs for animal therapy have been reported, many issues need to be addressed before clinical translation. This article provides a comprehensive review of USC biology and recent advances in their application for tissue regeneration. Challenges in the clinical translation of USC-based therapy are also discussed. Impact statement Recently, stem cells isolated from urine, referred to as urine-derived stem cells (USCs), have gained much interest in the field of regenerative medicine. Many advantages of human USCs have been found for cell-based therapy: (i) the cell isolation procedure is simple and low cost; (ii) they have remarkable proliferation ability, multidifferentiation potential, and paracrine effects; and (iii) they facilitate tissue regeneration in many animal models. With the hope to facilitate the development of USC-based therapy, we describe the current understanding of USC biology, summarize recent advances in their applications, and discuss future challenges in clinical translation.

Comprehensive Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine with Femoral Nerve Block for Pain Control Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

To compare the efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) and femoral nerve block following total knee arthroplasty, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis. 11 trials with 2,908 patients were included in this study. The pooled data demonstrated that total morphine consumption equivalents during the hospital stay was significantly increased in FNB group. In addition, LB has significantly better outcome in view of the postoperative functional recovery, such as the odds of fall, the incidences of straight leg rise (SLR), the number of patients who can walk independently in the day of surgery,the ambulation distance at POD1, the number of patients discharged at POD1. Consistent with the faster functional recovery, liposomal bupivacaine shortens the length of hospital stay. However, there was no significant difference between LB and FNB in terms of Visual Analogue Score (VAS) during the hospital stay. All in all, liposomal bupivacaine has significantly better outcome in view of the postoperative functional recovery and the length of hospital stay compared with femoral nerve block following the total knee arthroplasty.

A simple risk score model for predicting contrast-induced nephropathy after coronary angiography in patients with diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a common complication in patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and associated with poor outcome. Some previous studies have already set up models to predict CIN, but there is no model for patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) especially. Therefore, we aim to develop and validate a simple risk score for predicting the risk of CIN in patients with DM undergoing CAG/PCI. METHODS: A total of 1157 consecutive patients with DM undergoing CAG/PCI were randomly assigned to a development cohort (n = 771) and a validation cohort (n = 386). The primary endpoint was CIN, which was defined as an absolute increase in serum creatinine (SCr) by 0.5 mg/dL from the baseline within 48-72 h after contrast exposure. The independent predictors for CIN were identified by multivariate logistic regression, and the discrimination and calibration of the risk score were assessed by ROC curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow test, respectively. RESULTS: The overall incidence of CIN was 45 (3.9%). The new simple risk score (Chen score), which included four independent variables (age > 75 years, acute myocardial infarction, SCr > 1.5 mg/dL, the use of intra-aortic balloon pump), exhibited a similar discrimination and predictive ability on CIN (AUC 0.813, 0.843, 0.796, P > 0.05, respectively), mortality (AUC 0.735, 0.771, 0.826, respectively) and MACEs when being compared with the classical Mehran or ACEF risk score. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the new simple risk score might be a good tool for predicting CIN in patients with DM undergoing CAG/PCI.