Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 278(3): 781-789, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32656673

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The need for prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients is placing the otorhinolaryngologist in front of an increasing request for tracheostomy. Nowadays, there is uncertainty regarding the timing of tracheostomy, the prognosis of these patients and the safety of healthcare workers. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tracheostomy placement in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study on 23 COVID 19 patients, to analyse the timing of tracheostomy, the risk factors associated with in-hospital death and the infection of the involved health care workers. Early tracheostomy was defined as ≤ 10 days and late ones > 10 days. RESULTS: The mortality rate of COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU that underwent tracheostomy was 18%. The overall mortality of patients admitted to ICU was 53%. The univariate analysis revealed that early tracheostomy, SOFA score > 6, and D-dimer level > 4 were significantly associated with a greater risk of death. At the multivariate analysis SOFA score > 6 and D-dimer level > 4 resulted as significant factors for a higher risk of death. No health care workers associated with tracheostomy are confirmed to be infected by SARS-CoV2. CONCLUSION: We suggest to wait at least 14 days to perform tracheostomy. In patients with SOFA score > 6 and D dimer > 4, tracheostomy should not be performed or should be postponed. Optimized procedures and enhanced personal protective equipment can make the tracheostomy safe and beneficial in COVID-19 patients.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Traqueostomia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Surtos de Doenças , Feminino , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , RNA Viral , Respiração Artificial , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
2.
J Laryngol Otol ; 124(2): e2, 2010 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19943989

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The management of sudden sensorineural hearing loss has not yet been standardised. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy influences recovery from sudden sensorineural hearing loss, but the underlying mechanism is unknown and the appropriate indications and protocols undetermined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients affected by sudden sensorineural hearing loss were treated after unsuccessful medical therapy, either in an acute or chronic setting. Pure oxygen inhalation at 2.5 atmospheres absolute pressure was administered for 90 minutes, for 30 sessions. Frequency-specific and average pure tone hearing thresholds were determined before and after hyperbaric oxygen therapy. The number of hyperbaric oxygen therapy sessions, the patient's age and any therapeutic delay were considered as quantitative variables possibly influencing outcome. Stepwise multivariate analysis was performed. RESULTS: Salvage hyperbaric oxygen therapy appeared to improve patients' pure tone hearing thresholds, particularly at low frequencies. Positive results were more likely with increased patient age and reduced delay in receiving hyperbaric oxygen therapy. CONCLUSION: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy has a strong scientific rationale, and improves pure tone hearing thresholds in cases of sudden sensorineural hearing loss unresponsive to medical therapy. Further research may be able to identify those patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss for whom hyperbaric oxygen therapy would be most cost-effective.


Assuntos
Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/terapia , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Terapia de Salvação/métodos , Adulto , Audiometria de Tons Puros , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Radiol Med ; 96(3): 248-55, 1998 Sep.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9850720

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: We report our personal experience with the treatment of tonsillar cancers at the Otorhinolaryngology-Radiotherapy Department of Umberto I Hospital, Mestre, Italy. The results were analyzed by tumor site and stage, lymph node involvement, treatment type and patient age. MATERIAL AND METHODS: January, 1987, through December, 1995, we treated a hundred and 25 patients with carcinoma of the tonsil and tonsillar region. Most patients were men (M:F = 4:1), with a mean age of 61.9 years (range: 38-87). The lesions were staged at physical examination, chest radiography, bone scintigraphy. US of the liver and neck, CT and/or MRI of the tonsillar region and neck. Eleven patients were in stage I (8.8%), 26 in stage II (20.8%), 31 in stage III (24.8%) and 57 in stage IV (45.6%). Forty-one patients were submitted to tonsillectomy and more/less massive neck dissection: surgery was not radical-in 14 of them. All patients received gamma-photon radiotherapy with a cobalt unit: the minimum dose was 50 Gy after radical surgery and 60 Gy for exclusive irradiation and after nonradical surgery. The hemiblock field technique was always used with the conventional fractionation (2 Gy/day. 1 fraction/day, 5 fractions/week); the treatment was planned with the Theraplan V05-B method on CT scans. When the tolerance dose was reached, the spinal cord was shielded and the dose compensated with 9 MeV electrons. The treatment was discontinued only when needed, and never for more than 7-10 days. RESULTS: The overall 5-year survival and the 5-year disease-free survival rates were 28% and 45%, respectively; the overall 5-year cause-specific survival rate was 39%. Disease-free survival was 81% in stage I, 52.7% in stage II, 44.2% in stage III and 35.8% in stage IV (p = .005). The 5-year disease-free survival for the patients receiving surgery and irradiation was 62.1%, versus 38.3% for irradiation alone; the rate was 37.6% when neck nodes were involved (N+). One hundred and two patients achieved complete remission (CR), while the other 23 had partial remission (PR). Twenty-eight CR patients recurred; the most common cause of death was failure in primary tumor local control. There were no complications during or after treatment. Secondary lesions were found in 13 patients (10.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Irradiation alone yields fairly good results in early tonsil carcinoma, while the surgery-irradiation combination should be preferred in large tumors. Better results are expected from kinetic and conformal irradiation techniques with 3D calculations on CT and MR images, which should permit to deliver high doses to strictly targeted areas and to reduce side-effects. Other improvements are expected from new combination therapies.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Tonsilares/radioterapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Taxa de Sobrevida , Neoplasias Tonsilares/mortalidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...