Status epilepticus in the elderly-A retrospective study on 120 patients.

PURPOSE: Status epilepticus (SE) is one of the most common neurological emergencies with a high incidence in the elderly. Major determinants of prognosis are patients' age, duration of SE and underlying etiology. We aimed identifying differences in clinical presentation of SE, etiologies and outcome between patients (pts.) sixty years or older (≥60) and younger than sixty (<60) years (yrs). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 120 patients (48 women) with SE admitted to the Neurological Intensive Care Unit (NICU), Department of Neurology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Austria between 1/2011 and 01/2013. KEY FINDINGS: Median age was 69 years (range 14-90) (63% ≥60yrs). Generalized tonic clonic SE was the most common SE type, whereas non convulsive SE with and without coma tended to occur more frequently in the elderly (33% ≥60 yrs. vs. 20%<60 yrs, Chi2=3.511, p=0.061). Preexisting history of epilepsy was more common in the younger age group (64% vs 41% p=0.014). An acute symptomatic cause of SE was identified in 25% (31/120), with cerebrovascular diseases being more frequent in the elderly (47% vs. 11%; p<0.01). Duration of SE did not differ between the age groups (p=0.63). Mortality was higher in elderly patients (31% vs. 7%, p=0.028, Chi Square=5.18) and moderate disability in younger patients (42% vs 17%; p=0.005, Chi Square=7.83). After Bonferroni correction only the higher rate of cerebrovascular etiologies in the elderly was statistically significant. SIGNIFICANCE: In the elder population, SE occurs more often in patients without preexisting epilepsy and is most frequently caused by cerebrovascular diseases. NCSE tends to be more frequent in the elderly and diagnosis is complicated by subtle clinical presentation. Even though comorbidities represent treatment limitations, in our sample no differences in choice of AED as well as dosage were observed between the age groups, reflecting a trend toward AEDs with more favorable adverse event profile in all patients. SE in older patients is associated with poorer outcome and higher mortality.

Nontraumatic spinal cord injury at the neurological intensive care unit: spectrum, causes of admission and predictors of mortality.

OBJECTIVE: Nontraumatic spinal cord injuries (NTSCIs) form a heterogeneous group of diseases, which may evolve into a life-threatening condition. We sought to characterize spectrum, causes of admission and predictors of death in patients with NTSCI treated at the neurological intensive care unit (NICU). METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational analysis of NTSCI cases treated at a tertiary care center between 2001 and 2013. Among the 3937 NICU admissions were 93 patients with NTSCI (2.4%). Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, we examined predictors of mortality including demographics, etiology, reasons for admission and GCS/SAPS (Glasgow Coma Scale/Simplified Acute Physiology Score) scores. RESULTS: Infectious and inflammatory/autoimmune causes made up 50% of the NTSCI cases. The most common reasons for NICU admission were rapidly progressing paresis (49.5%) and abundance of respiratory insufficiency (26.9%). The mortality rate was 22.6% and 2.5-fold higher than in the cohort of all other patients treated at the NICU. Respiratory insufficiency as the reason for NICU admission [odds ratio (OR) 4.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38-17.9; p < 0.01], high initial SAPS scores (OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.003-1.08; p = 0.04), and the development of acute kidney injury throughout the stay (OR 7.25, 1.9-27.5; p = 0.004) were independent risk factors for NICU death. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NTSCI account for a subset of patients admitted to the NICU and are at risk for adverse outcome. A better understanding of predisposing conditions and further knowledge of management of critically ill patients with NTSCI is mandatory.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous valproate for status epilepticus: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of valproate (VPA) in the treatment of focal and generalized epilepsies is well established. The drug has a wide spectrum of action, good tolerability, and has been available as an injectable formulation since 1993. Despite the lack of class A evidence, it has been used extensively in various forms of status epilepticus (SE). AIM: Our aim was to present a systematic review of data from randomized and non-randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous VPA for the treatment of SE. METHODS: Data sources included MEDLINE, back tracing of references in pertinent studies, and contact with the manufacturer of VPA (Sanofi-Aventis). RESULTS: Overall, the search strategy yielded 433 results (425 MEDLINE, seven congress abstracts, one unpublished study); after excluding duplicate publications and case reports, 30 studies were identified (the earliest was published in 1993, the most recent in 2012); ten were controlled (six randomized controlled trials, four non-randomized controlled studies), and 20 uncontrolled trials (eight prospective observational studies, 12 retrospective case series). The cumulative literature describes the experiences of 860 patients with various forms of SE treated with intravenous VPA. The overall response rate to abrogate SE was 70.9% (601/848; 95% confidence interval [CI] 67.8-73.9). Response rates to intravenous VPA were better in children than in adults and did not differ between the SE types. The most commonly reported effective doses were between 15 and 45 mg/kg in bolus (6 mg/kg/min) followed by 1-3 mg/kg/h infusion. Safety studies of intravenous VPA administration in patients with SE showed a low incidence of adverse events overall (<10%), mainly dizziness, thrombocytopenia, and mild hypotension, which was independent of infusion rates. Of note, good cardiovascular and respiratory tolerability was observed in these studies, even at high doses and fast infusion rates (up to 30 mg/kg at 10 mg/kg/min), despite multiple morbidities or other antiepileptic drugs. The most serious concern relates to the possibility of acute encephalopathy, sometimes related to hepatic abnormalities or hyperammonemia. CONCLUSIONS: The published experience is consistent with VPA being a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with established SE who have previously failed conventional first-line treatment with benzodiazepines, but high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to inform clinicians on its comparative effectiveness in SE.

Causes of status epilepticus.

Status epilepticus (SE) is the most extreme form of epilepsy. It describes a prolonged seizure that may occur in patients with previous epilepsy or in acute disorders of the central nervous system. It is one of the most common neurologic emergencies, with an incidence of up to 41 per 100,000 per year and an estimated mortality is 20%. The three major determinants of prognosis are the duration of SE, patient age, and the underlying cause. Common and easily recognized causes of SE include cerebrovascular disorders, brain trauma, infections, and low antiepileptic drug levels in patients with epilepsy. Less common causes present a clinical and diagnostic challenge, but are major determinants of prognosis. Among them, inflammatory causes and inborn errors of metabolism have gained wide interest; recent insights into these causes have contributed to a better understanding of the pathophysiology of SE and its appropriate treatment. This review focuses on the different etiologies of SE and emphasizes the importance of prompt recognition and treatment of the underlying causes.