Essential steps in primary care management of older people with Type 2 diabetes: an executive summary on behalf of the European geriatric medicine society (EuGMS) and the European diabetes working party for older people (EDWPOP) collaboration.

We present an executive summary of a guideline for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care written by the European Geriatric Medicine Society, the European Diabetes Working Party for Older People with contributions from primary care practitioners and participation of a patient's advocate. This consensus document relies where possible on evidence-based recommendations and expert opinions in the fields where evidences are lacking. The full text includes 4 parts: a general strategy based on comprehensive assessment to enhance quality and individualised care plan, treatments decision guidance, management of complications, and care in case of special conditions. Screening for frailty and cognitive impairment is recommended as well as a comprehensive assessment all health conditions are concerned, including end of life situations. The full text is available online at the following address: essential_steps_inprimary_care_in_older_people_with_diabetes_-_EuGMS-EDWPOP___3_.pdf.

Hypoglycemia in Older Adults: Time Trends and Treatment Differences in Patients Aged ≥75 Years With Type 2 Diabetes.

OBJECTIVES: Hypoglycemia is a potentially life-threatening drug event under antidiabetic treatment. The aim of the study was to examine time trends in severe hypoglycemia in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and antidiabetic treatment. DESIGN: Multicenter prospective diabetes patient follow-up registry (DPV). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥75 years with T2DM and documented treatment between 2005 and 2019. METHODS: Outcomes of interest were rates of severe hypoglycemia, diabetes therapy, body mass index, HbA1c, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Time trends of outcomes were analyzed in the whole cohort and compared between age groups (75-<80, 80-<85, ≥85 years). RESULTS: A total of 136,931 patients from 188 diabetes centers were included. The adjusted HbA1c decreased from 7.3% (95% confidence interval 7.3-7.4) in 2005 to 7.2% (7.2-7.2) in 2019 (P < .001), with no significant difference between age groups (P = .47). Rates of severe hypoglycemia decreased from 6.7 (6.0-7.4) to 4.1 of 100 person-years (3.7-4.5) (P < .001) in the entire population. Patients aged ≥85 years had constantly lower HbA1c levels compared with younger groups (P < .001). Although severe hypoglycemia decreased the most in the ≥85 age group (P < .001), severe hypoglycemia remained consistently higher in this group compared with the 75 to <80 years group (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: During the analyzed time, the risk for severe hypoglycemia decreased. Although drugs with intrinsic risk for hypoglycemia were used less frequently, antidiabetic treatment in older adults should be further improved to continue reducing severe hypoglycemia in this age group, potentially accepting less strict metabolic control and age-specific target ranges.

Evidence gap on antihyperglycemic pharmacotherapy in frail older adults : A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Although antihyperglycemic pharmacotherapy in frail older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is challenging, recommendations from international guidelines are mainly based on indirect evidence from trials not including frail participants. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review investigated the effectiveness and safety of pharmacotherapy in frail older adults with T2DM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Randomized (RCT) and non-randomized prospective clinical trials (non-RCT) were searched in three electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Central) up to October 2018. Trials in older adults with T2DM who were assessed as significantly or severely impaired by defined cut-off scores of assessment instruments on frailty, activities of daily living or physical functional impairment were included. RESULTS: Two reviewers independently screened 17,391 references for inclusion and assessed risk of bias with ROBINS­I. Five non-RCTs and no RCT were identified. Treatment of T2DM without insulin compared to insulin could be associated with increased improvement in cardiac functions in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy and with decreased falls in frail older women. While better glycemic control with low variability and low HbA1c (hemoglobin A1c) values (<7%) was associated with better maintenance of physical function in community-dwelling older persons, higher HbA1c values (8-8.9%) were associated with a reduction in the composite outcome of death or functional decline in community-dwelling diabetic older adults with need for skilled assistance. Due to serious risk of bias in all studies, results should be considered with caution. CONCLUSION: Well-designed, large-scale RCTs including this important group of patients are required to assess the effectiveness and safety of pharmacotherapy and HbA1c targets.

[Diabetes mellitus in old age]. / Diabetes mellitus im Alter.

In the treatment of diabetes in old age cognitive, functional and constitutional resources of the individual must be taken into account. Purely glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)-oriented treatment goals are less relevant. The primary focus should be freedom from symptoms while avoiding hypoglycemia and maintaining the quality of life. The geriatric assessment helps to clarify the current functional, psychological and cognitive status as well as the need for support in multimorbid older people and to define appropriate treatment strategies. With drug treatment of diabetes in old age, particular attention must be paid to renal insufficiency and dehydration as well as slow dose adjustments. According to the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), diabetes patients belong to the risk group for a severe course of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); further risk factors are high blood pressure, underlying oncological diseases, cerebrovascular and coronary heart diseases.

Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: Real-World Data from the German/Austrian Prospective Diabetes Follow-Up Registry.

Background: To analyze key indicators of metabolic control in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using real-time or intermittent scanning continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM/iscCGM) during real-life care, based on the German/Austrian/Swiss Prospective Diabetes Follow-up (DPV) registry. Methods: Cross-sectional analysis including 233 adults with T1D using CGM. We assessed CGM metrics by gender, age group (18 to <30 years vs. ≥30 years), insulin delivery method (multiple daily injections vs. continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [CSII]) and sensor type (iscCGM vs. rtCGM), working days versus weekends, and daytime versus night-time using multivariable linear regression models (adjusted for demographic variables) or Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Overall, 79/21% of T1D patients used iscCGM/rtCGM. Those aged ≥30 years spent more time in range (TIR [70-180 mg/dL] 54% vs. 49%) and hypoglycemic range <70 mg/dL (7% vs. 5%), less time in hyperglycemic range >180 mg/dL (38% vs. 46%) and had a lower glucose variability (coefficient of variation [CV] 36% vs. 37%) compared with adults aged <30 years. We found no significant differences between genders. Multivariable regression models revealed the highest Time In Range (TIR) and lowest time with sensor glucose >250 mg/dL, CV and daytime-night-time differences in those treated with CSII and rtCGM. Glucose profiles were slightly more favorable on working days. Conclusions: In our real-world data, rtCGM versus iscCGM was associated with a higher percentage of TIR and improved metabolic stability. Differences in ambulatory glucose profiles on working and weekend days may indicate lifestyle habits affecting glycemic stability. Real-life CGM results should be included in benchmarking reports in addition to hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and history of hypoglycemia.

Effectiveness of a multimodal intervention in functionally impaired older people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes, a highly prevalent chronic disease, is associated with increasing frailty and functional decline in older people. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a multimodal intervention on functional performance in frail and pre-frail participants aged ≥70 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: The MID-Frail study was a cluster-randomized multicenter clinical trial conducted in 74 trial sites across seven European countries. The trial recruited 964 participants who were aged >70 years [mean age in intervention group, 78.4 (SD 5.6) years, 49.2% male and 77.6 (SD 5.29) years, 52.4% male in usual care group], with type diabetes mellitus and determined to be frail or pre-frail using Fried's frailty phenotype. Participants were allocated by trial site to follow either usual care (UCG) or intervention procedures (IG). Intervention group participants received a multimodal intervention composed of (i) an individualized and progressive resistance exercise programme for 16 weeks; (ii) a structured diabetes and nutritional educational programme over seven sessions; and (iii) Investigator-linked training to ensure optimal diabetes care. Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) scores were used to assess change in functional performance at 12 months between the groups. An analysis of the cost-effectiveness of the intervention was undertaken using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Secondary outcomes included mortality, hospitalization, institutionalization, quality of life, burden on caregivers, the frequency and severity of hypoglycaemia episodes, and the cost-effectiveness of the intervention. RESULTS: After 12 months, IG participants had mean SPPB scores 0.85 points higher than those in the UCG (95% CI, 0.44 to 1.26, P < 0.0001). Dropouts were higher in frail participants and in the intervention group, but significant differences in SPPB between treatment groups remained consistent after sensitivity analysis. Estimates suggest a mean saving following intervention of 428.02 EUR (2016) per patient per year, with ICER analysis indicating a consistent benefit of the described health care intervention over usual care. No statistically significant differences between groups were detected in any of the other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that a 12 month structured multimodal intervention programme across several clinical settings in different European countries leads to a clinically relevant and cost-effective improvement in the functional status of older frail and pre-frail participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Comparison of MDRD, CKD-EPI, and Cockcroft-Gault equation in relation to measured glomerular filtration rate among a large cohort with diabetes.

AIMS: To analyze the performance of Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), Cockcroft-Gault (CG), and CG calculated with ideal bodyweight (CG-IBW) equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on serum creatinine in a large diabetic population. METHODS: 24,516 adults with type-1-diabetes or type-2-diabetes from the multicenter diabetes prospective follow-up registry DPV were analyzed. We compared eGFR and measured GFR (mGFR) based on 24-h urine collection by calculating mean bias (difference), precision (SD of this difference), accuracy (proportion of eGFR within ±10% of mGFR), Bland-Altman-plots. RESULTS: CG overestimates, whereas MDRD, CKD-EPI, and CG-IBW underestimate. Smallest mean bias and highest accuracy (75.3%) were observed for MDRD compared to the other equations (p<0.0001). MDRD and CKD-EPI estimated most accurately in stages 1 (MDRD:57.7%, CKD-EPI:57.3%) and 2 (MDRD:80.2%, CKD-EPI:80.7%). In stages 3 to 5, highest accuracy was observed for the MDRD (stage 3:82.3%, stage 4:77.8%, stage 5:71.0%). Among younger subjects, accuracy was higher using the CKD-EPI (18-<40years:63.7%, 40-<60years:72.8%). Above age 60years, MDRD estimated most accurately (60-<70years:77.3%, ≥70years:78.8%). In males and females, MDRD estimated most accurately (males:75.3%, females:75.3%). CONCLUSION: In this large diabetic cohort, smallest bias and highest accuracy were observed for the MDRD.

High rate of hypoglycemia in 6770 type 2 diabetes patients with comorbid dementia: A multicenter cohort study on 215,932 patients from the German/Austrian diabetes registry.

AIMS: Dementia and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are two major phenomena in older people. To compare anti-hyperglycemic therapy and diabetes-related comorbidities between elderly T2D patients with or without comorbid dementia. METHODS: 215,932 type 2 diabetes patients aged ≥ 40 years (median [Q1;Q3]: 70.4 [61.2;77.7] years) from the standardized, multicenter German/Austrian diabetes patient registry, DPV, were studied. To identify patients with comorbid dementia, the registry was searched by ICD-10 codes, DSM-IV/-5 codes, respective search terms and/or disease-specific medication. For group comparisons, multiple hierarchic regression modeling with adjustments for age, sex, and duration of diabetes was applied. RESULTS: 3.1% (n=6770; 57% females) of the eligible T2D patients had clinically recognized comorbid dementia. After adjustment for demographics, severe hypoglycemia (insulin group: 14.8 ± 0.6 vs. 10.4 ± 0.2 events per 100 patient-years, p<0.001), hypoglycemia with coma (insulin group: 7.6 ± 0.4 vs. 3.9 ± 0.1 events per 100 patient-years, p<0.001), depression (9.9 vs. 4.7%, p<0.001), hypertension (74.7 vs. 72.2%, p<0.001), stroke (25.3 vs. 6.5%, p<0.001), diabetic foot syndrome (6.0 vs. 5.2%, p=0.004), and microalbuminuria (34.7 vs. 32.2%, p<0.001) were more common in dementia patients compared to T2D without dementia. Moreover, patients with dementia received insulin therapy more frequently (59.3 vs. 54.7%, p<0.001), but metabolic control (7.7 ± 0.1 vs. 7.7 ± 0.1%) was comparable to T2D without dementia. CONCLUSIONS: In T2D with dementia, higher rates of hypoglycemia and other diabetes-related comorbidities were observed. Hence, the risks of a glucocentric and intense diabetes management with insulin and a focus on tight glycemic control without considering other factors may outweigh the benefits in elderly T2D patients with comorbid dementia.

[Diabetes in old age: HbA1c - and then what?]. / Diabetes im Alter: HbA1c und wie weiter?

HbA1c is a surrogate parameter used to determine metabolic control. In old age different conditions influence erythrocyte half-life falsifying the validity of HbA1c. In older people with diabetes the ranges of HbA1c are frequently chosen higher. However hypoglycemia cannot be ruled out even with high HbA1c levels. Functional aspects, especially regarding cognitive function, are important to choose treatment goals, mainly regarding the risk of hypoglycemia.

Importance of Geriatric Syndromes in Older Patients with Diabetes with de novo Insulin Treatment: The VEGAS Study.

AIMS: The VEGAS study was conducted to evaluate representative data of de novo insulin-treated older patients with type 2 diabetes in the outpatient setting in Germany. METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter, non-interventional observational study, a nationwide written survey was carried out among practitioners (02/2011-06/2011). Older patients, aged ≥70 years, starting de novo insulin therapy, were documented. RESULTS: Data from 4,858 patients from about 500 centers (mean age: 78.2 ± 5.4 years; mean glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c]: 70 ± 14.2 mmol/mol [8.6 ± 1.3 %]) were collected. The mean target HbA1c value was 55 ± 6.6 mmol/mol (7.2 ± 0.6 %). 91.1 % of geriatric patients were multi-morbid. 96.2 % showed at least one physical or psychological geriatric syndrome. Most of the patients were notably impaired according to their age. Conventional insulin therapy and basal-supported oral therapy were the most frequently planned treatment regimens (39.1 and 31.1 %). Important factors in the selection of the insulin treatment regimen were an efficient HbA1c decrease (65.6 %), easy administration (55.7 %), and also a patient's ability to self-administer insulin (38.5 %). De novo insulin treatment increased care requirements (22.7 %). 22.3 % of the relatives were scheduled to receive special training. Specific training programs for older patients with diabetes were planned in only 7.3 % of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The data demonstrate the high prevalence of geriatric syndromes during de novo insulin treatment. Individual therapeutic goals and regimes are based on practicability, in particular, the receipt of autonomy and the care requirement. Diabetes education with adapted programs is currently under-represented. Important factors for the choice of an insulin treatment regimen were an efficient HbA1c decrease, easy administration, and a patient's ability for self-administration.

An evaluation of the effectiveness of a multi-modal intervention in frail and pre-frail older people with type 2 diabetes--the MID-Frail study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes, a highly prevalent, chronic disease, is associated with increasing frailty and functional decline in older people, with concomitant personal, social, and public health implications. We describe the rationale and methods of the multi-modal intervention in diabetes in frailty (MID-Frail) study. METHODS/DESIGN: The MID-Frail study is an open, randomised, multicentre study, with random allocation by clusters (each trial site) to a usual care group or an intervention group. A total of 1,718 subjects will be randomised with each site enrolling on average 14 or 15 subjects. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate, in comparison with usual clinical practice, the effectiveness of a multi-modal intervention (specific clinical targets, education, diet, and resistance training exercise) in frail and pre-frail subjects aged ≥70 years with type 2 diabetes in terms of the difference in function 2 years post-randomisation. Difference in function will be measured by changes in a summary ordinal score on the short physical performance battery (SPPB) of at least one point. Secondary outcomes include daily activities, economic evaluation, and quality of life. DISCUSSION: The MID-Frail study will provide evidence on the clinical, functional, social, and economic impact of a multi-modal approach in frail and pre-frail older people with type 2 diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01654341.

Psychological insulin resistance in geriatric patients with diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which geriatric patients with diabetes mellitus experience psychological insulin resistance (PIR). METHODS: A total of 67 unselected geriatric patients with diabetes (mean age 82.8±6.7 years, diabetes duration 12.2 [0.04-47.2] years, 70.1% female) were recruited in a geriatric care center of a university hospital. A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) was performed including WHO-5, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Barthel-Index. We assessed PIR using the Barriers of Insulin Treatment Questionnaire (BIT) and the Insulin Treatment Appraisal Scale in a face-to-face interview. RESULTS: Insulin-naïve patients (INP) showed higher PIR scores than patients already on insulin therapy (BIT-sum score: 4.3±1.4 vs. 3.2±1.0; p<0.001). INP reported in the BIT increased fear of injection and self-testing (2.4±2.4 vs. 1.3±0.8; p=0.016), expect disadvantages from insulin treatment (2.7±1.6 vs. 1.9±1.4; p=0.04), and fear of stigmatization by insulin injection (5.2±2.3 vs. 3.6±2.6; p=0.008). Fear of hypoglycemia, however, did not differ significantly (6.3±2.8 vs. 5.1±3.1; p=0.11). Depression was not shown to be a barrier to insulin therapy. CONCLUSION: INP with diabetes have a significantly more negative attitude toward insulin therapy in comparison to patients already on insulin. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Systematic assessment of barriers of insulin therapy, individualized diabetes treatment plans and information of patients may help to overcome such negative attitudes, leading to quicker initiation of therapy, improved adherence to treatment and a better quality of life.

Multicentre analysis of 178,992 type 2 diabetes patients revealed better metabolic control despite higher rates of hypertension, stroke, dementia and repeated inpatient care in patients with comorbid Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: Especially in older people, physicians are faced with the coexistence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and Parkinson's disease (PD). Therefore, this research aimed to compare diabetes endpoints between T2DM with and without PD. METHODS: Based on the standardized, multicenter, prospective DPV database, 178,992 T2DM patients (≥40 years) were analyzed. 1579 were diagnosed with PD and/or received specific treatment. Hierarchical multivariable regression models were used for group comparisons; adjusted estimates based on observed marginal frequencies were calculated. RESULTS: PD patients were significantly older (77.9 vs. 70.0 years; p < 0.0001) and had a longer diabetes duration (10.3 vs. 8.4 years; p < 0.0001). In young PD patients (<50 years), percentage of females was significantly higher compared to age-matched T2DM patients without PD or people of the German population (66.7 vs. 38.1 vs. 49.0%; p < 0.0001, p < 0.02). After demographic adjustment, T2DM patients with PD showed a significantly lower HbA1c (58.0 vs. 60.3 mmol/mol; p < 0.0001), OAD/GLP-1 treatment (41.9 vs. 45.9%; p < 0.01) and frequency of dyslipidemia (62.0 vs. 64.5%; p < 0.05). In contrast, rates of insulin therapy (57.8 vs. 54.8%; p < 0.05), hypertension (73.3 vs. 68.6%; p < 0.001), antihypertensive medication (60.4 vs. 56.1%; p < 0.01), stroke (12.0 vs. 7.3%; p < 0.0001), dementia (9.2 vs. 2.6%; p < 0.0001) and repeated inpatient care (15.7 vs. 12.0%; p < 0.0001) were significantly higher and duration of hospital stay (6.2 vs. 4.7 days; p < 0.0001) was significantly longer in T2DM with PD. CONCLUSION: Clear demographic and clinical differences were observed between T2DM with and without PD. In PD patients, metabolic control is better, potentially due to more intensive medical care.

Diabetes mellitus in older people: position statement on behalf of the International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics (IAGG), the European Diabetes Working Party for Older People (EDWPOP), and the International Task Force of Experts in Diabetes.

Diabetes mellitus is a highly prevalent metabolic condition in ageing societies associated with high levels of morbidity, multiple therapies, and functional deterioration that challenges even the best of health care systems to deliver high-quality, individualized care. Most international clinical guidelines have ignored the often-unique issues of frailty, functional limitation, changes in mental health, and increasing dependency that characterize many aged patients with diabetes. A collaborative Expert Group of the IAGG and EDWPOP and an International Task Force have explored the key issues that affect diabetes in older people using a robust method comprising a Delphi process and an evidence-based review of the literature. Eight domains of interest were initially agreed and discussed: hypoglycemia, therapy, care home diabetes, influence of comorbidities, glucose targets, family/carer perspectives, diabetes education, and patient safety. A set of "consensus" statements was produced in each domain of interest. These form a foundation for future policy development in this area and should influence the clinical behavior and approach of all health professionals engaged in delivering diabetes care to older people.