The effect of insulin on bone mineral density among women with type 2 diabetes: a SWAN Pharmacoepidemiology study.

This was a longitudinal study examining the effects of insulin use on bone mineral density loss. Insulin use was found to be associated with greater bone mineral density loss at the femoral neck among women with diabetes mellitus. INTRODUCTION: Women with diabetes mellitus (DM) have higher bone mineral density (BMD) and experience slower BMD loss but have an increased risk of fracture. The data regarding the effect of insulin treatment on BMD remains conflicted. We examined the impact of insulin initiation on BMD. METHODS: We investigated the annual changes in BMD associated with the new use of insulin among women with DM in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Propensity score (PS) matching, which is a statistical method that helps balance the baseline characteristics of women who did and did not initiate insulin, was used. Covariates with a potential impact on bone health were included in all models. Mixed model regression was used to test the change in BMD between the two groups. Median follow-up time was 5.4 years. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 110 women, mean age, 53.6 years; 49% white and 51% black. Women using insulin (n = 55) were similar on most relevant characteristics to the 55 not using insulin. Median diabetes duration for the user group was 10 vs. 5.0 years for the non-user group. There was a greater loss of BMD at the femoral neck among insulin users (- 1.1%) vs non-users (- 0.77%) (p = 0.04). There were no differences in BMD loss at the spine - 0.30% vs - 0.32% (p = 0.85) or at the total hip - 0.31% vs - 0.25 (p = 0.71), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Women with T2DM who initiated insulin experienced a more rapid BMD loss at the femoral neck as compared to women who did use insulin.

The prospective association between adiponectin and coronary artery disease among individuals with type 1 diabetes. The Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Recent findings suggest the potential involvement of adiponectin in obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease. We assessed the prospective association between adiponectin concentration and coronary artery disease in individuals with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Participants were identified from the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications cohort, a prospective follow-up study of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes. At baseline, subjects had a mean age of 28 years, and a mean diabetes duration of 19 years. Cases (determined by physician-diagnosed angina, confirmed myocardial infraction, stenosis >or=50%, ischemic ECG or revascularization) were matched to the control subjects with respect to sex, age and diabetes duration. Samples and risk factors for analyses were identified from the earliest exam prior to incidence in cases. Sera and information on all covariates were available for 28 cases and 34 control subjects. Proportional hazards models were constructed including matching variables. RESULTS: Compared with those in men, adiponectin concentrations were elevated in females (p=0.009) and among individuals with macroalbuminuria (p=0.04). In multivariable analyses (adjusting for standard risk factors as well as lipoprotein measurements determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, E-selectin or antioxidants), adiponectin inversely predicted the incidence of coronary artery disease (hazard ratio=0.37 per 1 SD increase, 95% CI 0.19-0.73, p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: The results suggest that increased adiponectin concentration is prospectively associated with a lower risk of coronary artery disease type 1 diabetes. The potential of adiponectin determination as a useful marker of, and potential therapeutic target for, coronary artery disease prevention in type 1 diabetes should be further explored.

The association of diabetes specialist care with health care practices and glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional analysis from the Pittsburgh epidemiology of diabetes complications study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether diabetes care characteristics and glycemic control differ by use of specialist care in a representative cohort of patients with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Health care, sociodemographic characteristics, and glycemic control were compared between participants in the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study who reported receiving specialist care (n = 212) and those who did not (n = 217). Specialist care was defined as having received care from an endocrinologist or diabetologist or diabetes clinic attendance during the last year. RESULTS: Patients who reported receiving specialist care were more likely to be female, to have an education level beyond high school, to have an annual household income >$20,000, and to have health insurance. Additionally, patients receiving specialist care were more likely to have received diabetes education during the previous 3 years, to have knowledge of HbAlc testing and to have received that test during the previous 6 months, to have knowledge of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial results, to self-monitor blood glucose, and to inject insulin more than twice daily. A lower HbA1 level was associated with specialist care versus generalist care (9.7 vs. 10.3%; P = 0.0006) as were higher education and income levels. Multivariate analyses suggest that the lower HbA1 levels observed in patients receiving specialist care were restricted to patients with an annual income >$20,000. CONCLUSIONS: Specialist care was associated with higher levels of participation in diabetes self-care practices and a lower HbA1 level. Future efforts should research and address the failure of patients with low incomes to benefit from specialist care.