Different Valsalva Manoeuvre Procedures for the Diagnosis of Right-to-Left Shunt by Contrast-Transcranial Doppler.

The main purpose of this study was to compare two contrast agent injection times during the Valsalva manoeuvre (VM) for the diagnosis of right-to-left shunt using contrast-transcranial Doppler (c-TCD). In total, 992 consecutive patients underwent testing. All patients underwent step 1, and then a coin toss was used to determine the order of steps 2 and 3. The following testing steps were repeated twice: (1) a contrast agent (CA) was infused at rest (CA at rest testing); (2) the VM was initiated immediately after CA injection and released 10 s after CA injection (CA pre-VM testing); and (3) a CA was injected 5 s after initiating the VM, which was released 5 s after CA injection (CA mid-VM testing). For the CA at rest, pre-VM and mid-VM groups, significant differences were observed in the positive right-to-left shunt diagnosis rates (11.49% vs. 23.08% vs. 26.11%, respectively, with an inter-group significance of p < 0.05) and grade classifications (p < 0.05). Although the times to first microbubble appearance were similar between the CA at rest and the CA pre-VM groups (8.96 ± 3.40 s vs. 8.42 ± 3.72 s, p > 0.05), it was shorter (6.4 ± 2.75 s, p < 0.05) for the CA mid-VM group than for the other two groups. For the c-TCD testing, the CA mid-VM group yielded different results for diagnosing right-to-left shunts relative to the CA pre-VM group.

[Comparison of two contrast agents for diagnosis of patent foramen ovale by contrast transcranial Doppler].

OBJECTIVE: To compare agitated saline solution (AS) and the mixture of AS with blood (ASb) as the contrast agents in contrast transcranial Doppler (c-TCD) in the diagnosis of patent foramen ovale (PFO). METHODS: We recruited 248 consecutive patients for c-TCD examination between November 2015 and January 2016, and the sequence of the use of AS (9 mL saline solution mixed with 1 mL air) and ASb (9 mL saline solution and a drop of the patient's blood mixed with 1 mL air) was determined by coin-tossing method. Before the examination, the contrast agent was injected with or without Valsalva maneuvers (VM), and the number of microbubbles within 25 s after the contrast agent injection and the time of first appearance of microbubbles were recorded by observing the TCD spectrum. Each injection was repeated twice and the interval between tests was at least 5 min. We classified PFO according to the number of microbubbles into negative (no microbubble), grade I (1-10 microbubbles), grade II (>10 microbubbles but no curtain), and grade III (with curtain). RESULTS: s The positivity rates in diagnosis with AS without VM, AS with VM, ASb without VM, and ASb with VM tests were 10.9%, 23.8%, 12.1% and 25.8%, respectively. AS with VM test had a higher positive rate than AS without VM test (23.8% vs 10.9%, P=0.001), and ASb with VM test had a higher positive rate than ASb without VM test (25.8% vs 12.1%, P=0.001). The positive rates were similar between ASb without VM and AS without VM test (12.1% vs 10.9%, P=0.250) and between ASb with VM test and AS with VM test (25.8% vs 23.8%, P=0.125). CONCLUSION: VM can improve the positive rate of PFO diagnosis in c-TCD examination, and the positive rates are comparable between examinations using the contrast agents AS and ASb.