Risk factors for pancreatic infection in patients with severe acute pancreatitis: an analysis of 163 cases.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify the risk factors for predicting pancreatic infection in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). METHODS: In all, 163 patients with SAP were included and divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of pancreatic infection. Their demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory examination results, complications and treatment modalities were collected from their medical records. Variables were initially screened by univariate analysis and those with statistical significance were then filtered by multivariate analysis to determine the independent risk factors for pancreatic infection in SAP. RESULTS: Patients having SAP with pancreatic infection had a lower partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2 ), peripheral white blood cell count and alkaline phosphatase levels, together with a higher computed tomography severity index (CTSI) than those without pancreatic infection, while their lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels and blood urea nitrogen were much higher. Pancreatic infection was also more common in patients receiving late fluid resuscitation than in those receiving early fluid resuscitation. Multivariate analyses revealed that increased LDH level, high CTSI, delayed fluid resuscitation and hypoxemia were independent risk factors for pancreatic infection in SAP. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for a model combining the parameters in predicting pancreatic infection were 84%, 97%, 88% and 96%, respectively, with a cut-off value of 0.393, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.923. CONCLUSION: Increased LDH, high CTSI, delayed fluid resuscitation and hypoxemia are independent risk factors for predicting pancreatic infection in patients with SAP.

Adiponectin levels in patients with colorectal cancer and adenoma: a meta-analysis.

Inconsistent results with regard to adiponectin levels in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and adenoma have been reported. To evaluate adiponectin levels in patients with CRC and adenoma, a meta-analysis on studies which compared adiponectin levels in patients with CRC or adenoma with healthy controls was carried out. A literature search was performed through Pubmed, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded database. Pooled-weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated by using random-effects models. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using the Cochran's Q and I statistics. A total of 13 studies were identified, which included 2632 cases of CRC or adenoma and 2753 healthy controls. Adiponectin levels were significantly lower in patients with CRC or adenoma compared with healthy controls, with significant heterogeneity [weighted mean differences of -1.51 (95% CI: -2.42 to -0.59; Pheterogeneity<0.001) for CRC and -1.29 (95% CI: -2.01to -0.58; Pheterogeneity<0.001) for colorectal adenoma, respectively]. On stratified analysis of CRC, significant difference in adiponectin levels between patients with CRC and healthy controls was reported only in case-control studies or small sample size studies (n<100), but not in nested case-control studies or large sample size studies (n≥100). In addition, metaregression analysis indicated that study design and sample size partly contributed to the significant heterogeneity (P=0.022 for study design and P=0.018 for sample size, respectively). For colorectal adenoma studies, stratified analysis indicated that sample size was one of the heterogeneous factors. Sensitivity analysis showed that there were no changes in the direction of effect when any one study was excluded. No publication bias was detected. Adiponectin levels are lower in patients with CRC or colorectal adenoma compared with those in healthy controls. Future studies are warranted to clarify the association of adiponectin levels and carcinogenesis of the colorectum.