Quantitative evaluation of the global impacts of human land modification on raptors.

Raptors are threatened by anthropogenic land modifications, but targeted quantitative assessment of these impacts is lacking. We conducted the first global quantitative evaluation of the impacts of human-modified land on raptors. We used eBird data from 2001 to 2020 on 425 raptor species and occupancy models to assess the impacts of human-modified land on raptor distribution. The mean spatiotemporal correlations of human settlement, cropland, and pasture with raptor occupancy probability were -0.048 (SE 0.031), -0.134 (0.032), and -0.145 (0.032), respectively. The mean sensitivity of raptor occupancy probability to settlement, cropland, and pasture was -5.760 (2.266), -3.128 (1.540), and -2.402 (1.551), respectively. The occupancy probability of raptors with a large body mass was more negatively correlated with cropland (phylogenetic generalized least squares regressions: slope = -0.052 [SE 0.022], t = -2.335, df = 1, 407, p = 0.020, λ = 0.006) and more positively correlated with pasture (slope = 0.047 [0.022], t = 2.118, df = 1, 407, p = 0.035, λ = 0.013). The occupancy probability of raptors with a more extensive range size was more positively correlated with cropland (slope = 0.002 [0.004], t = 0.399, df = 1, 407, p < 0.001, λ = 0.000). Raptors that prefer open habitats were more positively correlated with cropland (analysis of variance: F = 3.424, df = 2, p = 0.034, λ = 0.000) and pasture (F = 6.577, df = 2, p = 0.002, λ = 0.000). In Africa and South America, where raptor species are most abundant, raptor occupancy probability decreased over 20 years, most likely due to habitat fragmentation associated with human land modification. Although raptors with different ecological characteristics had different responses to human land modification, the impacts of settlement, cropland, and pasture on mean raptor occupancy probability were negative, regardless of space and time.

Evaluación cuantitativa del impacto global de la modificación humana del uso de suelo sobre las rapaces Resumen Las rapaces se encuentran amenazadas por las modificaciones de suelo antropogénicas, pero la evaluación cuantitativa focalizada de estos impactos es muy escasa. Realizamos la primera evaluación cuantitativa mundial del impacto del suelo modificado por humanos sobre las rapaces. Usamos datos de eBird desde 2001 hasta 2020 sobre 425 especies rapaces y modelos de ocupación para evaluar el impacto del suelo modificado por humanos sobre la distribución de estas especies. La correlación espaciotemporal media de los asentamientos humanos, las tierras de cultivo y las pasturas con probabilidad de ocupación por rapaces fueron ­0,048 (SE 0,031), ­0,134 (0,032) y ­0,145 (0,032), respectivamente. La sensibilidad media de la probabilidad de ocupación de las rapaces a los asentamientos, las tierras de cultivo y las pasturas fue de ­5,760 (2,266), ­3,128 (1,540) y ­2,402 (1,551), respectivamente. La probabilidad de ocupación de las rapaces con gran masa corporal tuvo una correlación más negativa con las tierras de cultivo (regresiones filogenéticas por mínimos cuadrados generalizados: pendiente =­0. 052 [SE 0,022], t = ­2,335, gl = 1, 407, p = 0,020, λ = 0,006) y una correlación más positiva con los pastos (pendiente = 0,047 [0,022], t = 2,118, gl = 1, 407, p = 0,035, λ = 0,013). La probabilidad de ocupación de las rapaces con un área de distribución más extensa tuvo una correlación más positiva con las tierras de cultivo (pendiente = 0,002 [0,004], t = 0,399, gl = 1, 407, p < 0,001, λ = 0,000). Las rapaces que prefieren hábitats abiertos tuvieron una correlación más positiva con las tierras de cultivo (análisis de la varianza: F = 3,424, gl = 2, p = 0,034, λ = 0,000) y los pastos (F = 6,577, df = 2, p = 0,002, λ = 0,000). En África y América del Sur, en donde son más abundantes las especies rapaces, la probabilidad de ocupación de las rapaces disminuyó a lo largo de 20 años, probablemente debido a la fragmentación de hábitat asociada con la modificación del suelo por humanos. Aunque las rapaces con características ecológicas diferentes tienen diferentes respuestas a estas modificaciones, el impacto de los asentamientos, las tierras de cultivo y las pasturas fue negativo para la probabilidad de ocupación media de las rapaces, sin importar el espacio ni el tiempo.

Distribution of Breeding Population and Predicting Future Habitat under Climate Change of Black-Necked Crane (Grus nigricollis Przevalski, 1876) in Shaluli Mountains.

Climate change is affecting biodiversity by altering the geographical distribution range of species, and this effect is amplified in climate-sensitive areas. Studying the geographic distribution of flagship species in response to climate change is important for the long-term conservation of species and the maintenance of regional biodiversity. Therefore, we collected field survey records from 2016 to 2020 and conducted field surveys of black-necked cranes in the Shaluli Mountains (SLLMs) in May-June and August-October 2021; 103 breeding records were acquired totally, and the geographical distribution range under the current and four future climate scenarios was modeled with the MaxEnt model to predict the impact of climate change on its distribution and habitat quality. The results showed that 152 black-necked cranes were surveyed in seven counties of SLLMs in total; the estimated number of black-necked cranes in the entire SLLMs was about 200. The currently suitable habitat area is 27,122 km2, mainly distributed in gentle meadows and wetland habitats along the lake where the Annual Mean Temperature is -1 °C and the Mean Diurnal Range (16 °C) and Precipitation Seasonality (105) are comparatively large. Furthermore, the breeding range would expand to varying degrees under future climate scenarios and showed a migration trend toward the northwest and higher elevation. Besides, as time goes by, the habitat for black-necked cranes in SLLMs would become more homogeneous and more suitable. The conservation effectiveness of the existing reserve network would keep stable with climate change, although there are large conservation gaps between protected areas, and these gaps will gradually expand over time. Overall, this study provides a preliminary understanding of the population and distribution and predicts the future distribution of black-necked cranes in the SLLMs. It also demonstrates the importance of SLLMs for protecting the central population of black-necked cranes and maintaining regional biodiversity. Therefore, we recommend long-term monitoring and conservation of the black-necked crane population and wetland resources in the region.