Systematic review of research barriers, facilitators, and stakeholders in long-term care and geriatric settings, and a conceptual mapping framework to build research capacity.

BACKGROUND: Older adults are underrepresented in research. Heterogeneity of research processes in this population, specifically in long-term care (LTC) and geriatric acute care (GAC), is not well described and may impede the design, planning, and conduct of research. In this study, we identified, quantified, and mapped stakeholders, research stages, and transversal themes of research processes, to develop a mapping framework to improve research capacity by better characterizing this heterogeneity. METHODS: Multicomponent mixed methods study. An environmental scan was used to initiate a preliminary framework. We conducted a systematic literature search on processes, barriers, and methods for clinical research in GAC and LTC to extract and update stakeholders, research stages, and themes. Importance and interactions of elements were synthesized via heatmaps by number of articles, mentions, and content intersections. RESULTS: For our initial framework and environmental scan, we surveyed 24 stakeholders. Of 9277 records, 68 articles were included in our systematic review and allowed us to identify 12 stakeholders, 13 research stages, 17 transversal themes (either barriers, facilitators, general themes, or recommendations), and 1868 intersections. Differences in relative importance between LTC and GAC emerged for stakeholders (staff, managers vs. caregivers, ethics committees), and for research stages (funding, facility recruitment vs. ethics, individual recruitment). Crucial themes according to specific stakeholders were collaboration for the research team; communication, trust, and human resources for managers; heterogeneity for patients and residents. A heatmap framework synthesizing vital stakeholders and themes per research stage was generated. CONCLUSIONS: We identified and quantified the interactions between stakeholders, stages, and themes to characterize heterogeneity in LTC and GAC research. Our framework may serve as a blueprint to co-construct and improve each stage of the research process.

Institutional, therapeutic, and individual factors associated with 30-day mortality after COVID-19 diagnosis in Canadian long-term care facilities.

BACKGROUND: Canadian long-term care facility (LTCF) residents experienced higher death rates compared to other countries during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. This cohort study analyzes the individual, therapeutic, and institutional factors associated with death in LTCFs. METHODS: Institutional data for 17 LTCFs in Montreal, Canada were obtained from local administrative registries. Individual data for 1197 residents infected by SARS-CoV-2 between February 23 and July 11, 2020 were obtained through chart reviews. A multivariable modified Poisson regression model, which accounted for LTCF clustering, was used to identify resident and facility covariates associated with 30-day mortality after COVID-19 diagnosis. RESULTS: Severe shortage of licensed practical nurses (RR 2.60 95% CI 1.20-5.61) and medium-sized facilities compared to smaller-sized facilities (RR 2.73 95% CI 1.23-6.07) were associated with 30-day mortality. Later COVID-19 diagnosis (RR 0.98 95% CI 0.97-0.99 per additional day) was associated with survival. Individual risk factors for death included age (RR 1.33 95% CI 1.23-1.45 per additional 10 years), male sex (RR 1.46 95% CI 1.24-1.71), functional impairment (RR 1.08 95% CI 1.04-1.12 per unit increase of SMAF), as well as a diagnosis of congestive heart failure (RR 1.31 95% CI 1.04-1.66) and neurocognitive disorder (RR 1.31 95% CI 1.01-1.70). Among severe cases, anticoagulation was associated with survival (RR 0.70 95% CI 0.51-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: This study identified practical nurse shortages and facility size as institutional risk factors for COVID-19 death. Anticoagulation was associated with survival among severe cases.