RESUMO
PURPOSE: To determine whether the STOP-Bang questionnaire, which is a tool for evaluating obstructive sleep apnea, is associated with aortic remodeling after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD). METHODS: Patients with TBAD who underwent standard TEVAR at our center from January 2015 to December 2020 were enrolled. For the included patients, we recorded baseline characteristics, comorbidities, preoperative computed tomographic angiography findings, procedure details, and complications. The STOP-Bang questionnaire was administered to each patient. Total scores comprised points for 4 yes/no questions and 4 clinical measurements. STOP-Bang ≥5 and STOP-Bang <5 groups were then created using the STOP-Bang total scores. We evaluated aortic remodeling 1 year after discharge and the reintervention rate, as well as false lumen complete thrombosis (FLCT) and non-FLCT length. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were enrolled in the study; STOP-Bang <5, n=36, and STOP-Bang ≥5, n=19. Compared with the STOP-Bang ≥5 group, the STOP-Bang <5 group achieved statistically significantly higher descending aorta positive aortic remodeling (PAR) rates in zones 3 to 5 (zone 3: p=0.002; zone 4: p=0.039; zone 5: p=0.023), higher total descending aorta-PAR rate (66.7% vs 36.8%, respectively; p=0.004), and lower reintervention rate (8.1% vs 38.9%, respectively; p=0.005). In the logistic regression analysis, STOP-Bang ≥5 had an odds ratio of 0.12 (95% confidence interval: 0.03-0.58; p=0.008). There was no significant difference in overall survival between the groups. CONCLUSION: STOP-Bang questionnaire scores were associated with aortic remodeling after TEVAR in patients with TBAD. Increasing the frequency of surveillance after TEVAR might be beneficial in these patients. CLINICAL IMPACT: We analysed aortic remodelling 1 year after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD) patients with STOP-Bang < 5 and STOP-Bang ≥ 5. Aortic remodelling was better, and the reintervention rate was higher in patients with STOP-Bang < 5 compared with patients with STOP-Bang ≥ 5. In patients with STOP-Bang ≥ 5, aortic remodelling was worse in zones 3-5 compared with zones 6-9. This study suggests that the STOP-Bang questionnaire results is associated with aortic remodelling after TEVAR in patients with TBAD.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the relationship between the condition of the inframalleolar (IM) arteries, as assessed by the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System Inframalleolar (GLASS IM) modifier, and the outcomes of patients with diabetic foot ulcers. METHODS: The data of 215 patients, who underwent endovascular therapy from January 2016 to May 2020 at our center, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into the P0, P1, and P2 groups according to the angiography results. The rates of ulcer healing, limb salvage, survival, and amputation-free survival were compared during the 2-year period after discharge. RESULTS: Of the 216 affected limbs, 35 (16%) were classed as P0, 122 (57%) as P1, and 59 (27%) as P2. Compared with the P2 group, the P0 + P1 group had a higher ulcer healing rate (P = 0.001), a shorter ulcer healing time (P = 0.004), and a higher survival rate (P = 0.044). GLASS IM Modifier classification P2 was an independent predictor of nonhealing ulcers. No significant difference was observed between the P0 versus P1 groups. CONCLUSIONS: GLASS IM modifier classification P2 is an independent risk factor for a poor outcome. GLASS IM modifier classification P0 versus P1 demonstrates similar outcomes to each other.
