Attitudes, knowledge and practices concerning delirium among paediatric intensive care unit nurses: a multisite cross-sectional study in Sichuan, China.

BACKGROUND: Delirium is an acute mental state associated with poor outcomes. The incidence of delirium is high, especially in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU). It is important for staff, particularly nurses, to understand delirium and implement interventions to prevent it. We performed a survey with the aim of evaluating and analysing the factors influencing the knowledge, attitudes and behaviour of PICU nurses towards delirium. METHODS: This cross-sectional descriptive study included 215 PICU nurses in 6 PICUs from five teaching hospitals in Sichuan Province, China. An online survey about the knowledge, attitudes and practices related to delirium care was conducted among PICU nurses used a self-made and validated questionnaire. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics; differences between groups were compared using t tests, ANOVA and rank-sum tests. Variables with a significance level of 0.05 in the univariate analysis were entered into the multivariable regression analysis to identify predictors. RESULTS: Only 14.4% of the nurses had a good understanding of delirium, and 40.9% had received relevant training. The mean knowledge score was 9.01 ± 3.86, and the overall passing rate of knowledge was 49.8%. The mean attitude and behaviour scores were 40.95 ± 5.62 and 40.33 ± 8.01, respectively. Among the hospitals, different delirium assessments for children and specific training were performed, explaining approximately 10% of the variability in knowledge scores (F = 6.152), approximately 10% of the variability in attitude/belief scores (F = 5.908), and approximately 17% of the variability in practice scores (F = 10.767). CONCLUSIONS: PICU nurses have poor knowledge of delirium, particularly regarding its clinical manifestations, influencing factors and medications used, and they have adequate attitudes and confidence and good behaviour regarding delirium in children. To better prevent delirium, we suggest that PICU departments routinely assess delirium and conduct delirium training for nurses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

A Scoring System to Select the Candidates for Adjuvant Chemotherapy Alone in High-Risk Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Patients With Pelvic Lymph Node Metastases After Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to build a risk scoring system to guide the adjuvant treatment for early-stage cervical cancer patients with pelvic lymph node (LN) metastases after surgery. METHODS: A cohort of 1213 early-stage cervical cancer patients with pelvic LN metastases (T1-2aN1M0) were selected from the NCI SEER database, of which 1040 patients received adjuvant external beam radiotherapy concurrent with chemotherapy (EBRT+Chemo) and 173 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy alone. The Cox regression analysis was applied to identify the risk factors associated with worse survival. The exp (ß) of each independent risk factors from multivariate analysis was assigned to develop the risk scoring system. The total cohort was divided into different risk subgroups accordingly and the efficacy of different adjuvant modalities in each risk subgroups was compared. RESULTS: The patients were divided into 3 risk subgroups (Low-risk: total score <7.20, Middle-risk:7.20≤ total score≤ 8.40, High-risk: total score<8.40) based on the scoring system incorporating 5 independent risk factors. The survival analysis suggested that low-risk (hazard ratio [HR]=1.046, 95% CI: 0.586-1.867; P= 0.879) and middle-risk patients (HR=0.709, 95% CI: 0.459-1.096; P =0.122) could not benefit more from EBRT+Chemo than Chemo alone. However, EBRT+Chemo remained the superiority to Chemo alone in the high-risk subgroup (HR=0.482, 95% CI: 0.294-0.791; P =0.003). CONCLUSION: A risk scoring system has been built to direct the adjuvant treatment for early-stage cervical cancer patients with pelvic LN metastases after surgery, where Chemo alone was totally enough for low-risk and middle-risk patients stratified by the model while EBRT+Chemo was still recommended for patients in the high-risk subgroup.

A population-based risk scoring system to individualize adjuvant treatment for stage IIIC endometrial cancer patients after surgery.

BACKGROUND: To develop a risk scoring system to tailor the adjuvant treatment for stage IIIC EC patients after surgery. METHODS: Data source was from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry, where 3251 post-operative stage IIIC EC patients with different adjuvant treatment were included. Cox regression analysis was used to identify risk factors. The exp (ß) of each independent risk factors generating from the cox analysis was used to construct the risk scoring system, which was further utilized to divide the patients into different risk subgroups and the efficacy of different adjuvant modalities in each risk subgroups would be compared accordingly. RESULTS: Six independent risk factors were identified to develop the scoring system, which further divided the patients into three risk subgroups based on the total risk score (Low-risk≤8.46, 8.47 ≤ Middle-risk≤9.94, High-risk≥9.95). This study revealed that CRT was not superior to RT alone (HR:1.208, 95%CI: 0.852-1.741; P = 0.289) or CT alone (HR:1.260, 95%CI: 0.750-2.116; P = 0.382) in Low-risk subgroup. We also observed that CRT had a survival advantage over other treatment modalities in the Middle-risk subgroup (All P < 0.001), but CRT and CT alone to be superimposable in the High-risk subgroup (HR: 1.395, 95%CI: 0.878-2.216; P = 0.159). CONCLUSION: A risk scoring system has been developed to tailor the adjuvant treatment for stage IIIC EC patients after surgery, where RT or CT alone could be a substitute for CRT in Low-risk patients and CT alone was a potential alternative for High-risk patients while CRT remained to be the optimal choice for the Middle-risk patients.

Translation and validation of M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Thyroid Cancer module in Chinese thyroid cancer patients: a cross-sectional and methodological study.

AIM: To translate and validate the Chinese version of the MDASI-THY among thyroid cancer patients. BACKGROUND: The M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Thyroid Cancer module (MDASI-THY) is one of well-validated instruments for thyroid-specific symptom assessment. To date, the instrument has not been used in China. METHODS: After standard forward- and back-translation procedures, two instruments, the Chinese version of MDASI-THY and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ C30, were answered by 309 thyroid patients. The content, convergent discriminant validity and reliability of the MDASI-THY were evaluated. RESULTS: The scale of content validity index (S-CVI) and the item of content validity index (I-CVI) of the instrument were over 0.80. There were significant relationships between MDASI-THY and EORTC QLQ-C30 (r range, 0.139 ~ 0.766, -0.759 ~ -0.461, p < 0.001). Symptoms were severer for patients underwent surgical treatment (Z = -9.999, p < 0.001). The Cronbach's alpha was 0.966 (between 0.954 and 0.827 for subscales). Most symptom items had moderate to high interitem correlations (r range, 0.297 ~ 0.773). CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese version of MDASI-THY demonstrated favorable validity and reliability. It can be used in development of symptom management program in thyroid cancer patients in China. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Healthcare providers can apply this instrument to assess Chinese thyroid cancer patients to increase the understanding of their symptom experience, resulting in a better symptom management.

Investigation of the Quality of Recovery of Surgical Patients Based on the Chinese Version of the Quality of Recovery-15 Survey, a Cross-Sectional Study.

PURPOSE: The quality of recovery (QoR) is an important indicator of a patient's health status in the early postoperative period. Despite its importance, the QoR from the patient's perspective is often neglected in clinical practice. This study was performed to survey and determine the QoR of surgical patients from their own subjective perspective and to provide a reference for the targeted postoperative care of surgical patients in the future. DESIGN: A descriptive and cross-sectional study. METHODS: The Chinese version of the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scale was used to survey the QoR of 503 surgical patients in 20 surgical wards from 17 surgical departments of a large tertiary hospital in Sichuan Province, China. A questionnaire survey was administered to each patient before and after the operation, and the scores were compared. FINDINGS: There were no significant differences in "feeling worried or anxious" and "feeling sad or depressed" between the preoperative and postoperative periods (P > 0.05). The postoperative scores for the other items were significantly lower than the preoperative scores. The total postoperative QoR-15 score was significantly lower than the total preoperative score (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The QoR-15 scores of surgical patients were lower after the surgery than before, and patients still needed care after discharge. Therefore, due to the gradual shortening of the length of stay (LOS) of surgical patients, it is necessary for hospitals to construct a complete surgical patient transitional care process to meet the needs of patients after discharge and promote patient rehabilitation.

[Responsiveness of Chinese version of Neck Outcome Score in subjects with neck pain].

Objective: To analyze responsiveness of Chinese version of Neck Outcome Score (NOOS-C) and provide a reliable measure to assess intervention effect for patients with neck pain. Methods: Cross-cultural adaptation of NOOS was performed according to the Beaton's guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Eighty patients with neck pain were recruited between September 2016 and May 2017. Those patients were assessed using NOOS-C and Chinese version of Neck Disability Index (NDI) before and after intervention. And 71 patients completed those questionnaires. The statistic differences of the score of each subscale and the total scale before and after intervention were evaluated by paired-samples t test. Internal responsiveness was determined by effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM) based on the calculated difference before and after intervention. External responsiveness was analyzed by Spearman correlation coefficient. Results: The differences in symptom subscale, sleep disturbance subscale, participating in everyday life subscale, every day activity and pain subscale, and the scale between before and after intervention were significant ( P<0.05) except for mobility subscale ( P>0.05). The difference of NDI-C before and after intervention was -12.11%±17.45%, ES was 0.77, and SRM was 0.69. The difference of NOOS-C before and after intervention was 13.74±17.22, ES was 0.83, and SRM was 0.80. Spearman correlation analysis revealed that the relativity about NOOS-C and NDI-C before and after intervention were both negative ( r=-0.914, P=0.000; r=-0.872, P=0.000). Conclusion: NOOS-C's responsiveness is good.