Application of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: One of the most important treatments for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is radiation therapy. Currently, the criteria for administering postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy (PORT) in SCLC remain uncertain. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the influence of PORT on the prognosis of limited-stage SCLC (LS-SCLC). METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search across three databases, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Data analysis involved utilizing both random-effects and fixed-effects models for pooling the results. A comparative analysis was performed to assess the prognostic outcomes of patients with LS-SCLC who did and did not undergo PORT. The primary outcome assessed was overall survival (OS), while the secondary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: This analysis included 11 retrospective studies comprising 7694 eligible participants. Among the entire population of LS-SCLC patients, the OS was superior in those receiving PORT than in those not receiving it (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.79, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-0.87; P < 0.0001). In pN0 stage LS-SCLC patients, PORT was associated with a detrimental effect on OS (HR: 1.22, 95 % CI: 1.04-1.43; P = 0.01). In pN1 stage LS-SCLC patients, additionally administering PORT did not provide a significant OS advantage as compared to not administering it (HR: 0.82, 95 % CI: 0.60-1.12; P = 0.21). In pN2 stage LS-SCLC patients, those receiving PORT demonstrated a significant improvement in OS (HR: 0.59; 95 % CI: 0.50-0.70; P < 0.0001) as compared to those not receiving it. Regarding DFS in LS-SCLC patients, the difference in the protective effect with and without the administration of PORT was less pronounced (HR: 0.76, 95 % CI: 0.58-1.00; P = 0.053). CONCLUSIONS: With respect to OS, PORT is not advisable in patients with pN0 or pN1 stage LS-SCLC but is highly recommended in pN2 stage LS-SCLC. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings.

APOBEC3B and CD274 as Combined Biomarkers for Predicting Response to Immunotherapy in Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder.

Immunotherapy has become a promising form of treatment for cancers. There is a need to predict response to immunotherapy accurately. In the UCSC Xena, pan-cancer analysis revealed a positive relationship between APOBEC3B (A3B) and tumor mutational burden (R = 0.28, P < 0.001) and microsatellite instability (R = 0.12, P < 0.05). Naturally, the A3B high expression group had higher tumor mutational burden and microsatellite instability than the low expression group. The bladder cancer (BLCA) cohort in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) revealed tumor mutational signatures of A3B high and low expression groups. Compared to the low expression group, the high expression group had a higher number of SNPs and mutations. Subsequently, A3B was profiled for immune cell infiltration and immune checkpoints in bladder cancer. The results showed that A3B was positively correlated with most immune cells. Compared with the A3B low expression group, the A3B high expression group had higher expression of immune checkpoints. A3B was positively correlated with CD274 (R = 0.12, P = 0.016). This indicated that the high expression of A3B may have a better response to immunotherapy. Furthermore, data from the IMvigor210 immunotherapy clinical trial was used to confirm the findings of this study. The combined survival analysis of A3B and CD274 showed that the group of patients with high expression of CD274 and A3B was found to have a significantly higher survival rate than the rest of the patient group (P < 0.047). The results demonstrated that A3B has a significant role in immunotherapy. Moreover, the combined biomarkers of A3B and CD274 were more effective in predicting response to immunotherapy in bladder urothelial carcinoma. The findings of this study provide valuable insights for precision medicine.

Analysis of the clinical efficacy and safety of computerized tomography-guided 125 I seed implantation in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer that relapsed after chemoradiotherapy.

Purpose: The purpose is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of computerized tomography (CT)-guided 125I seed implantation in the treatment of recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after chemoradiotherapy. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 30 recurrent NSCLC patients in our institute from January 2016 to June 2020. According to the preoperative Treatment planning system plan, CT was used to guide 125I seed implantation into 30 evaluable lesions in the lungs. Clinical response rate, quality of life score, and adverse reactions were observed at postoperative follow-up. Results: The postoperative follow-up duration was 13 (1-24) months, of which the disease control rate at months one, three, and six were 96.67%, 93.1%, 85.18%, respectively and the objective response rate was 53.33%, 48.27%, and 48.14%, respectively. The postoperative 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 76.66% (23/30) and 53.33% (16/30), respectively. Median overall survival was 18 (1-24) months. The postoperative 1-year and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 63.33% (19/30) and 40% (12/30), respectively. The median PFS was 14.5 (1-24) months. Adverse reactions include radiation-related pulmonary reactions in four patients (13.33%); skin reactions in four patients (13.33%); radiation-related esophageal reactions in two patients (6.67%), and leukopenia in three patients (10%). Other radiation-related adverse reactions did not occur. Conclusion: We conclude that 125I seed implantation is an effective and safe treatment for recurrent NSCLC.

Risk Model and Immune Signature of m7G-Related lncRNA Based on Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Lung cancer is a major cause of cancer-related deaths globally, with a dismal prognosis. N7-methylguanosine (m7G) is essential for the transcriptional phenotypic modification of messenger RNA (mRNA) and long noncoding RNA (lncRNA). However, research on m7G-related lncRNAs involved in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) regulation is still limited. Herein, we aim to establish a prognostic model of m7G-related lncRNAs and investigate their immune properties. Eight prognostic m7G-related lncRNAs were identified using univariate Cox analysis. Six m7G-related lncRNAs were identified using LASSO-Cox regression analysis to construct risk models, and all LUAD patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort was divided into low-risk and high-risk subgroups. The accuracy of the model was verified by Kaplan-Meier analysis, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic, principal component analysis, independent prognostic analysis, nomogram, and calibration curve. Further studies were conducted on the gene set enrichment and disease ontology enrichment analyses. The gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed that the high-risk group enriched for cancer proliferation pathways, and the enrichment analysis of disease ontology (DO) revealed that lung disease was enriched, rationally explaining the superiority of the risk model. Finally, we found that the low-risk group had higher immune infiltration and checkpoint expression. It can be speculated that the low-risk group has a better effect on immunotherapy. Susceptibility to antitumor drugs in different risk subgroups was assessed, and it found that the high-risk group showed high sensitivity to first-line treatment drugs for non-small cell lung cancer. In conclusion, a risk model based on 6 m7G-related lncRNAs can not only predict the overall survival (OS) rate of LUAD patients but also guide individualized treatment for these patients.

A retrospective study on unresectable or inoperable head and neck cancers treated with stereotactic ablative brachytherapy.

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of stereotactic ablative brachytherapy (SABT) for unresectable or inoperable head and neck cancers. Material and methods: This study retrospectively assessed clinical data of 37 patients with unresectable or inoperable head and neck cancers treated with SABT from October 2016 to October 2021. Variables evaluated included local efficacy, local control rate (LCR), overall survival (OS) rate, and radiological adverse effects. Results: The median follow-up was of 34 months (range, 5-59 months), and LCR at 6, 12, and 24 months was 89.2%, 78.2%, and 69.4%, respectively. The median survival time was 16 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 10.5-21.5 months], and the OS rate at 6, 12, and 24 months was 97.3%, 70.3%, and 34.5%, respectively. The results of univariate analysis revealed that the type of pathology and gross tumor volume (GTV) D90 were related to LCR (p < 0.05). However, the type of pathology, GTV D90, age, and implantation site were related to OS rate (p < 0.05). The results of multivariate analysis showed that the type of pathology and GTV D90 were substantially related to LCR and OS rate (p < 0.05). The evaluation of post-operative radiological adverse reactions revealed that seven cases (18.9%) developed grade 1-2 skin reactions, four cases (10.8%) developed grade 1-2 oral mucosal outcomes, and no cases developed grade 3 or higher adverse reactions. Post-operative seed dislocation occurred in three patients with tongue cancer. Conclusions: SABT has produced good local control and mild adverse reactions in the treatment of unresectable or inoperable head and neck cancers. Additionally, it is safe, feasible, minimally invasive, and has fewer adverse effects than other treatment modalities.