Nomogram to predict the presence of PSMA-negative but FDG-positive lesion in castration-resistant prostate cancer: a multicenter cohort study.

Background: PSMA-negative but FDG-positive (PSMA-/FDG+) lesion in dual-tracer (68Ga-PSMA and 18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is associated with an unfavorable response to Lutetium-177 (177Lu)-PSMA-617. This study sought to develop both radiomics and clinical models for the precise prediction of the presence of PSMA-/FDG+ lesions in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CPRC). Methods: A cohort of 298 patients who underwent dual-tracer PET/CT with a less than 5-day interval was included. The evaluation of the prognostic performance of the radiomics model drew upon the survival data derived from 40 patients with CRPC treated with 177Lu-PSMA-617 in an external cohort. Two endpoints were evaluated: (a) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate, defined as a reduction exceeding 50% from baseline and (b) overall survival (OS), measured from the initiation of 177Lu-PSMA-617 to death from any cause. Results: PSMA-/FDG+ lesions were identified in 56 (18.8%) CRPC patients. Both radiomics (area under the curve [AUC], 0.83) and clinical models (AUC, 0.78) demonstrated robust performance in PSMA-/FDG+ lesion prediction. Decision curve analysis revealed that the radiomics model yielded a net benefit over the 'screen all' strategy at a threshold probability of ⩾4%. At a 5% probability threshold, the radiomics model facilitated a 21% reduction in 18F-FDG PET/CT scans while only missing 2% of PSMA-/FDG+ cases. Patients with a low estimated score exhibited significantly prolonged OS (hazard ratio = 0.49, p = 0.029) and a higher PSA response rate (75% versus 35%, p = 0.011) compared to those with a high estimated score. Conclusion: This study successfully developed two models with accurate estimations of the risk associated with PSMA-/FDG+ lesions in CRPC patients. These models held potential utility in aiding the selection of candidates for 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment and guiding 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-directed radiotherapy.

Predictive nomogram for PSMA-/FDG+ lesion This study developed two models with accurate estimations of the risk associated with specific lesions in prostate cancer.

Heterogeneity of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: genomic characteristics and association with abiraterone response.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the spatial heterogeneity of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) uptake on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) characteristics and the response rate to new hormonal agent (NHA) treatment. METHODS: This retrospective study included 153 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who underwent gallium-68 [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and ctDNA sequencing with a less than 2-week interval. SUVhetero was defined as the variance of SUVmean for each PSMA-positive lesion. SUVmax-mean was obtained by subtracting the SUVmax by the SUVmean. Patients receiving abiraterone treatment after [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and ctDNA sequencing and with complete follow-up record were included into prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate analysis. PSA response was defined as a reduction of greater than 50% from baseline. RESULTS: The ctDNA detection rate was 65% (100/153). Higher SUVhetero value contributed to higher ctDNA% (Spearman's rho = 0.278, p < 0.002). A total of 60 patients were included in PSA response rate analysis. The median follow-up was 19.3 (IQR 16.2-23.2) months. Compare to patients with higher SUVhetero value, patients with NA SUVhetero had a higher PSA response rate (52% vs. 90%, p = 0.036). A higher SUVmax-mean value was strongly correlated with higher SUVhetero (Spearman's rho = 0.833, p < 0.0001). Patients with higher SUVmax-mean value also had a higher PSA response rate compared to patients with lower SUVmax-mean value (83.3% vs. 53.3%, p = 0.024). An external cohort confirmed baseline SUVmax-mean value was associated with enzalutamide treatment response rate. Patients with alterations in AR, DNA damage repair pathway, TP53, AR-associated pathway, cell cycle pathway, or WNT pathway had higher SUVmax-mean value compared to those without (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Spatial heterogeneity of the PSMA uptake was associated with ctDNA characteristics and response rate to NHA treatment.

The prevalence and prognosis of next-generation therapeutic targets in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

The success of the PROfound, IPATential150, and TheraP trials promoted the transition from sequential treatment to therapeutic targets (TTs)-guided precision treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and prognostic value of TTs from these three trials. All included Chinese mCRPC patients underwent circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing, PTEN status assessment, and dual-tracer [68 Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and 18 F-fluorodexyglucose (FDG)] positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Previous treatment with cabazitaxel, Lu-PSMA or olaparib was unallowed. Patients with known significant sarcomatoid or spindle cell or neuroendocrine small cell components were also excluded. TTs were defined as positive as follows: (a) high PSMA and no PSMA-/FDG+ disease on dual-tracer PET/CT scans; (b) defects in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes in ctDNA; and (c) loss of PTEN immunohistochemistry staining in tumor tissue. The prevalence and prognostic value on progression-free survival (PFS) of TTs were evaluated. A total of 106 consecutive mCRPC patients were included. The prevalence of positive PET/CT, HRR defect, and PTEN loss was 30%, 29% and 16%, respectively. Sixty-three patients had at least one TT. Metastatic volume (odds ratio = 5.0; P = 0.017) was the only independent factor of positive TT in multivariate analysis. Seventy-four patients received abiraterone after TT screening. Patients with positive PET/CT (P = 0.011) and HRR defect (P = 0.002) had a significantly shorter PFS after receiving abiraterone than patients with negative TTs. However, PTEN status was unrelated to PFS, which may be due to a less number of patients with PTEN loss (P = 0.952). Overall, patients with any positive TTs had a significantly shorter PFS after abiraterone than patients with negative TTs (P = 0.009). Nearly 60% of Chinese patients with mCRPC who had a poor prognosis on abiraterone were candidates for precision treatments based on the specific criteria of TTs.

Fat Attenuation Index of Renal Cell Carcinoma Reveals Biological Characteristics and Survival Outcome.

Purpose: The computed tomography fat attenuation index (FAI) is an ideal quantifiable imaging factor to identify the inflammation degree of peri-tumor adipose tissue. We aimed to verify whether FAI could reflect peri-tumor adipose inflammation, predict the survival outcome of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and discover transcriptomic features of tumor tissues and adjacent adipocytes. Materials and Methods: Two clinical cohorts (Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center [FUSCC] cohort [n=129] and TCGA cohort [n=218]) were used to explore the association between FAI and clinical outcome. A prospective cohort (n = 19) was used to discover the molecular phenotyping of peri-tumor adipose tissue and tumor tissue according to their FAI value. A clinical cohort (n = 32) in which patients received cyto-reductive surgery was used to reveal the dynamic change of FAI. Results: A high peri-tumor FAI was significantly associated with a worse outcome in both the FUSCC (HR = 2.28, p = 0.01) and the TCGA cohort (HR = 2.24, p <0.001). The analysis of the RNA expression of paired RCC tissue and peri-tumor fat tissue showed synchronized alterations in pathways such as cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction and complement and coagulation cascades. RCC tissues showed significant alterations in the neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction pathway. Immune deconvolution analysis showed enhanced infiltration of macrophages in high FAI tumor tissues with a lower angiogenesis level. We also observed synchronous dynamic changes in FAI and tumor size after targeted therapy. Conclusion: In summary, FAI could be used in RCC to reflect the biological characteristics and tumor immune micro-environment of both the tumor and the peri-tumor adipose. High peri-tumor FAI had the potential to predict a worse survival outcome in various cohorts. This study demonstrates that the crosstalk exists between a tumor and its micro-environment and could be reflected easily by imaging procedures, which could facilitate clinical decision making.

Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Lesions Detected via 68Ga-Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen and 18F-Fluorodexyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Patients with Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer with Early Prostate-specific Antigen Progression on Androgen Deprivation Therapy: A Prospective Single-center Study.

BACKGROUND: Dual-tracer positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with a 68Ga-labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) improves detection of metastatic heterogeneity and burden in patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer (nmPCa). However, there is limited prospective evidence regarding its impact on the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate metastasis-free survival (MFS) and toxicity after SBRT to dual-tracer PET/CT-detected metastases in patients with nmPCa and early prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT; PSA ≤2 ng/ml). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients were prospectively screened using dual-tracer PET/CT between April 2019 and October 2020. SBRT was recommended for patients with five or fewer nonvisceral metastases (SBRT group). Patients without detectable metastases (N-/M- group) and those who refused SBRT (ADT group) continued to receive ADT. Patients were followed with conventional imaging. INTERVENTION: SBRT to each PET/CT-detected metastasis. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Kaplan-Meier methods were used to determine MFS. Toxicity was evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event v4.0. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Seventy-four consecutive patients were screened. The median PSA and PSA doubling time were 0.59 ng/ml and 4.56 mo, respectively. Overall, 54 patients had metastases and 17 had PSMA-/FDG+ disease. Seven patients were excluded from the MFS analysis, including two with a history of abiraterone treatment and five with more than five metastases. The median follow-up was 21.4 mo. The ADT group had shorter MFS than the SBRT group (11.0 mo vs not reached; hazard ratio [HR] 4.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.92-25.0; p < 0.001) and the N-/M- group (11.0 mo vs not reached; HR 8.78, 95% CI 4.04-40.30; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in median MFS between the SBRT group and the N-/M- group (p = 0.261). A PSA response >90% was achieved by 86% of patients in the SBRT group. There were no grade ≥3 adverse events after SBRT. The nonrandomized design is the major study limitation. CONCLUSIONS: Dual-tracer PET/CT-guided SBRT delivered superior local control rates in comparison to ADT alone and had minimal toxicity. PATIENT SUMMARY: We investigated metastasis-targeted radiotherapy for patients with up to five prostate cancer metastases detected with two different radioisotope scans. Our results show that this approach yields promising metastasis-free survival and low toxicity.

Impact of oral nutritional supplements in post-discharge patients at nutritional risk following colorectal cancer surgery: A randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Guidelines on clinical nutrition recommend the use of appropriate nutritional support therapy for surgical cancer patients at risk of malnutrition both during hospital care and following discharge from the hospital. However, previous studies regarding nutritional interventions have mainly focused on patients during their hospital stay; there is limited evidence supporting the recommendation of nutritional interventions for post-discharge patients after cancer surgery, particularly those who underwent gastrointestinal cancer surgery and at high risk of malnutrition. To clearly address this issue, we designed and conducted two independent studies on two different groups of post-discharge patients at nutritional risk after gastrointestinal cancer surgery. The present study aimed to assess the impact of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) in post-discharge patients at nutritional risk following colorectal cancer surgery. Meanwhile, the sister study on the use of ONS in post-discharge patients following gastric cancer surgery will be reported separately. METHODS: Between January 2017 and June 2019, post-discharge patients following colorectal cancer surgery in our institution were randomised to receive either dietary advice alone (control group) or dietary advice in combination with ONS (ONS group) for three months if they were at nutritional risk based on the tool of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002. The primary endpoints were nutritional outcomes and sarcopenia prevalence. The secondary endpoints were 90-day readmission rate, chemotherapy tolerance, and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: Of the 232 eligible patients, 212 (107 in the control group and 105 in the ONS group) completed the trial. Their data were then analyzed. The mean ONS intake was 410 mL every day. By the three-month intervention, the skeletal muscle index in the ONS group was significantly higher than that in the control group (39.75 ± 5.83 vs 38.01 ± 6.18 cm2/m2, P = 0.037), but no significant differences between the two groups were noted in weight, weight loss, body mass index, serum albumin and hemoglobin (P > 0.05). In addition, the ONS group had a significantly lower sarcopenia prevalence (28.6% vs 42.1%, P = 0.040). No significant difference between the two groups was found in the 90-day readmission rate (P > 0.05). The number of patients undergoing postoperative chemotherapy in the two groups was similar, but chemotherapy modifications, such as delay, dose reduction, or termination, were significantly reduced in the ONS group (21.2% vs 36.8%, P=0.024). However, ONS had no significant effect on QoL (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In post-discharge patients at nutritional risk following colorectal cancer surgery, the use of ONS may reduce skeletal muscle loss and sarcopenia prevalence, as well as improve chemotherapy tolerance, compared with dietary advice alone. These findings underline the importance of ONS treatment in post-discharge patients at nutritional risk following colorectal cancer surgery.