Applications of Mechanical Arm in the Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification and the Differential Diagnosis of Breast Tumors.

ABSTRACT: To assess the diagnostic performance of quantitative parameters for virtual touch tissue imaging quantification by the mechanical arm probe, 128 women with 152 breast lesions (90 benign and 62 malignant) were included and maximum elasticity (Vmax), median elasticity (Vmean), maximum elasticity minus minimum (Vmax-min), and minimum elasticity (Vmin) were measured. Intercorrelation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots were used to compare the repeatability and consistency of handheld probe and mechanical arm measurements. Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency. The results showed that intercorrelation coefficients were 0.694 to 0.951 by the mechanical arm and 95% limits of agreement were wider than handheld probe. Using 4.36 m/s as cutoff value for Vmax by the mechanical arm, we achieved sensitivity (88.7%) and specificity (90.0%). We concluded that the mechanical arm can reduce the influence of different scanning pressures on the elastic modulus of breast tissue.

The Clinical Value of New Scoring System of Cervical Lymph Node.

To distinguish malignant cervical lymphadenopathy, we established a new scoring system based on ultrasound features. Two hundred sixty-three patients with cervical lymphadenopathy received ultrasonic examination and underwent ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy or fine needle aspiration. The scoring system was proposed by multivariate logistic regression analysis and compared with Liao scoring system (0.06 × age + 4.76 × shortest-to-longest axis ratio + 2.15 × internal echo + 1.80 × vascular pattern). A new scoring system model, 1.346 × margin + 1.339 × hilum + 2.411 × calcification + 2.619 × vascular pattern + 0.837 × shortest-to-longest axis ratio, was generated. Lymph nodes were regarded as malignancy when the score was ≥2.4. Compared with the Liao scoring system, the new scoring system had larger area under the curve (0.86 versus 0.76, P = 0.036), specificity (86.7% versus 75.0%, P = 0.001), accuracy (87.1% versus 80.6%, P = 0.007), and positive predictive value (89.0% versus 80.0%, P = 0.043). Sensitivity (87.4% versus 85.3%, P = 0.647) and negative predictive value (85.0% versus 81.0%, P = 0.395) did not differ. We concluded that the new scoring system is more reliable and can play an important role in the differential diagnosis of cervical lymph nodes.