Quantitative analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and superb microvascular imaging for the evaluation of disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of conventional US (ultrasound), SMI (superb microvascular imaging), and CEUS (contrast-enhanced ultrasound) features for the assessment of the activity of inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: Conventional US, CEUS and SMI features of 76 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into two groups: active group (n = 57) and inactive group (n = 19), with endoscopic results as reference standard. Results in the active group and inactive group were compared using an independent t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. Cut-off values were determined using ROC analysis, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated. US quantitative and TIC-based quantitative parameters were analyzed, and each patient was scored based on the parameters that are statistically significant and immediately available in the clinic to evaluate the diagnostic ability of conventional US, SMI, and CEUS features for active IBD patients. RESULTS: Qualitative parameters such as CEUS enhancement pattern I/II, LimbergIII/IV, and lost bowel stratification were reliable indicators of active patients. Quantitative parameters such as bowel thickness and VI of mSMI were reliable indicators of active patients. Patients scored based on these statistically significant parameters with a score ≥3, were highly suspected to be active patients. For TIC-based quantitative parameters, PE, WiAUC, WoAUC, WiWoAUC, WiR, WiPI, and WoR were statistically significant in the differentiation of active IBD from inactive IBD. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional US, SMI, and CEUS features may help in the differentiation of active IBD from inactive IBD and have potential application value in the choice of treatment options.

No significant relationship exists between tumor size and prognosis in distant metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis based on SEER database.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that tumor size has an impact on the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Whether tumor size is related to the prognosis of distant metastatic HCC is unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of tumor size on the prognosis of distant metastatic HCC. METHODS: Data on patients with HCC were collected from the (SEER) database of surveillance, epidemiology and final results. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce confounding factors and comprehensively evaluate the clinicopathological features and prognosis of distant metastatic HCC. RESULTS: There were 189 patients with distant metastatic HCC whose tumor size was ≤ 50 mm and 615 patients with a tumor size > 50 mm. The tumor sizes of distant metastatic HCC patients were associated with race, grade, surgical treatment, N and AFP. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the mortality rate of patients with a tumor size > 50 mm was higher than that of patients with a tumor size ≤ 50 mm (p = 0.00062). However, there were no significant differences in mortality rates after adjusting for confounding variables by using propensity score matching (p = 0.23). CONCLUSION: This propensity score matching study provides the best data in support of the following assertions: tumor size is not an independent prognostic factor for distant metastatic HCC.