The effect of pericolic lymph nodes metastasis beyond 10 cm proximal to the tumor on patients with rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to determine the real incidence of pericolic lymph nodes metastasis beyond 10 cm proximal to the tumor (pPCN) and its prognostic significance in rectal cancer patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients with rectal cancer underwent curative resection between 2015 and 2017 were included. Margin distance was marked and measured in vivo and lymph nodes were harvested on fresh specimens. Clinicopathological characteristics and oncological outcomes (3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS)) were analyzed between patients with pPCN and patients without pPCN (nPCN). RESULTS: There were 298 patients in the nPCN group and 14 patients (4.5%) in pPCN group. Baseline characteristics were balanced except more patients received preoperative or postoperative chemoradiotherapy in pPCN group. Preoperative more advanced cTNM stage (log-rank p = 0.005) and intraoperative more pericolic lymph nodes beyond 10 cm proximal to the tumor (PCNs) (log-rank p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for pPCN. The maximum short-axis diameter of mesenteric lymph nodes ≥8 mm was also contributed to predicting the pPCN. pPCN was an independent prognostic indicator and associated with worse 3-year OS (66% vs 91%, Cox p = 0.033) and DFS (58% vs 92%, Cox p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: The incidence of pPCN was higher than expected. Patients with high-risk factors (cTNM stage III or more PCNs) might get benefits from an extended proximal bowel resection to avoid residual positive PCNs.

The prognostic significance of MRI-detected extramural venous invasion, mesorectal extension, and lymph node status in clinical T3 mid-low rectal cancer.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of the magnetic resonance imaging-detected extramural venous invasion (MR-EMVI), the depth of mesorectal extension (MR-DME), and lymph node status (MR-LN) in clinical T3 mid-low rectal cancer. One hundred and forty-six patients with clinical T3 mid-low rectal cancer underwent curative surgery were identified. Pretreatment high-resolution MRI was independently reviewed by two experienced radiologists to evaluate MR-EMVI score (0-4), MR-DME (≤4 mm or >4 mm), and MR-LN (positive or negative). The Cox-multivariate regression analysis revealed that the MR-EMVI was the only independent prognostic factor that correlated with overall 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.01). The survival analysis showed that patients with positive MR-EMVI, MR-DME > 4 mm, and positive MR-LN had a poorer prognosis in the overall 3-year DFS (HR 3.557, 95% CI 2.028 to 13.32, p < 0.01; HR 3.744, 95% CI:1.165 to 5.992, p = 0.002; HR 2.946, 95% CI: 1.386 to 6.699, p < 0.01). By combining MR-EMVI with MR-DME or MR-LN, the prognostic significance was more remarkable. Our study suggested that the MR-EMVI, MR-DME, and MR-LN were the important prognostic factors for patients with clinical T3 mid-low rectal cancer and the MR-EMVI was an independent prognostic factor.

Clinical significance of the EMD/mesorectum ratio of T3 mid-low rectal cancer: A retrospective observational study.

Previous studies suggested that the extramural distance (EMD) should be considered in therapeutic decision-making of rectal cancer because it can be used as an indicator of the T3 subclassification; however, reports of impact of EMD/mesorectum ratio on prognosis are rare.The objectives of this study were to evaluate the feasibility of the extramural distance EMD/mesorectum ratio as a maker of the T3 subclassification for T3 mid-low rectal cancer and find the potential radiological marker on MRI for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).From December 2012 to December 2016, 287 consecutive patients with MRI-staged T3 mid-low rectal cancer were enrolled. The EMD was defined as the distance from the outer edge of the muscularis propria to the outer edge of tumor, and the mesorectum was measured as the distance from outer edge of muscularis propria to mesorectal fascia (MRF) in the same layer. The association of the EMD/mesorectum ratio and other MRI or clinicopathological factors with survival was analyzed. The independent prognostic factors were estimated by Cox regression analysis.The mean EMD/mesorectum ratio was 0.43. Based on ROC analysis, we chose a EMD/mesorectum ratio of 0.3 for further analyses. Of 287 patients, 163 (56.8%) had a EMD/mesorectum ratio ≥ 0.3. Patients with an EMD/mesorectum ratio ≥ 0.3 had a decreased recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) (P < .001; P = .034, respectively). Of the 163 patients, patients with nCRT had a higher RFS than patients without nCRT (P = .001). Multivariate analysis showed that the EMD/mesorectum ratio was the only independent prognostic factors for RFS.Our study provided evidence that the EMD/mesorectum ratio could be used for T3 subclassification, the optimal cut-off value of EMD/mesorectum ratio was 0.3 when the ratio was applied to classify T3 mid-low rectal cancer patients, and nCRT should be performed for these patients when the EMD/mesorectum ratio is ≥ 0.3.

Prognostic role of the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in colorectal cancer: An up-to-date meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although previous meta-analyses have proved that lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) is a prognostic factor in solid cancers, its prognostic role in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains controversial. We, therefore, conducted this up-to-date meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic role of the LMR in CRC. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in PubMed and Embase for relevant studies in November 2016. Article assessing the prognostic role of LMR in CRC was enrolled in this meta-analysis. Data and characteristics of each study were extracted. A meta-analysis was performed to generate pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival. Begg funnel plot was used to evaluate publication bias. RESULTS: Eleven studies published between 2014 and 2016 with a total of 9045 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. Our findings indicated that a low LMR predicted a worse OS (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.30-1.90, P < .001) and disease-free survival. (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.13-1.39, P < .001) for patients with CRC. Subgroup analyses according to stage (I-III and IV) and LMR cut-off value (<3.00 and ≥3.00) showed a significant prognostic value of LMR on OS. Begg funnel plot showed that publication bias existed in this meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This up-to-date meta-analysis shows that a low LMR is associated with poor survival in patients with CRC, although the publication bias is existed. Large-sample multicenter prospective cohort is needed to assess the role of the LMR in CRC patients.

Do inflammatory markers predict prognosis in patients with synchronous colorectal cancer?

Systematic inflammatory response markers are considered as the most informative prognostic factors in many types of cancer. However, in synchronous colorectal cancer (synCRC), the prognostic value of inflammatory markers, including prognostic nutritional index (PNI), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (d-NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), had rarely been evaluated. Thus, this present study reviewed our consecutive patients with synCRC to investigate the prognostic value of those factors.The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) was considered as the secondary endpoint. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to determine optimal cutoff levels for the 5 markers. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models were applied to assess the relationship between OS, DFS, and inflammatory markers.In total, 114 patients with pathologically confirmed synCRC at initial diagnosis were identified among 5742 patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer from October 2009 to May 2013. In the multivariate analysis, elevated postoperative NLR (≥10.50) was confirmed as an independent prognostic factor for 3-year OS (P = .001; hazard ratio [HR] 4.123, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.750-9.567) and DFS (P = .001; HR 3.342, 95% CI 1.619-6.898). In addition, for 3-year OS, both tumor grade and pN stage were confirmed as independent prognostic factors. And pN stage was confirmed as an independent prognostic factor for 3-year DFS.In conclusion, this study identified elevated postoperative NLR is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with synCRC underwent surgery resection, and the NLR provides improved accuracy for predicting clinical outcomes to stratify patients into different risk categories.

Laparoscopic Colectomy Versus Open Colectomy for Treatment of Transverse Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The surgical management of transverse colon cancer (TCC) is still not standardized. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of laparoscopic colectomy (LC) for treatment of TCC in terms of short-term and long-term outcomes compared with open colectomy. METHOD: A systematic literature search with no limits was performed in PubMed and Embase. The last search was performed on September 15, 2016. The short-term outcomes included intraoperative outcomes, postoperative outcomes, and oncological surgical quality. The long-term outcomes included overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Thirteen articles and one conference abstract published between 2010 and 2016 with a total of 1728 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. LC was associated with significant less estimated blood loss, fewer total postoperative complications, and shorter time to first flatus, time to liquid diet, length of hospital stay, and length of postoperative hospital stay. However, longer operative time was needed in LC. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups concerning the intraoperative complications, mortality, ileus, anastomotic leakage, bleeding, wound infection, abdominal infection, lymph nodes harvested, proximal resection margin, distal resection margin, OS, or DFS. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis suggests that LC is a safe and feasible technique for TCC associated with less estimated blood loss, fewer total postoperative complications, quicker recovery of intestinal function, shorter length of hospital stay, and equivalent long-term outcomes. Furthermore, a large-scaled, prospective randomized controlled study is warranted to verify those results.

First case report of retroperitoneal metastasis of fascioliasis after surgery.

RATIONALE: Fascioliasis is a rare cause of liver abscesses, and its clinical course consists of hepatic phase and biliary phase. PATIENT CONCERNS: We describe a 58-year-old female patient who presented with a 2-month history of intermittent fever and abdominal pain. An abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed confluent low-density lesions in the liver. Complete surgical resection of these abscesses was performed, and postoperative pathological examination and serological tests confirmed a diagnosis of fascioliasis. However, 4 months after the surgery, follow-up CT revealed a lesion in the retroperitoneal area. Meanwhile, ultrasonography-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of the retroperitoneal lesion was performed, and a parasitic infection was suspected. DIAGNOSES: Retroperitoneal metastasis of hepatic phase fascioliasis. INTERVENTIONS: The patient received parasitic resistance treatment with triclabendazole at a dose of 10 mg/kg/d for 2 consecutive days. OUTCOMES: After 2 courses of triclabendazole therapy, the retroperitoneal metastasis regressed to a minor lesion. LESSONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of retroperitoneal metastasis of fascioliasis, aimed at helping recognize the clinical features and treatment options of this rare disease.

Lymphoepithelioma-like hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report and brief review of literature.

RATIONAL: Lymphoepithelioma-like hepatocellular carcinoma (LEL-HCC) is a rare variant of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To date, few cases have been reported in the literature, and almost no report in analyzing the different features of LEL-HCC. PATIENT CONCERNS: We describe a 37-year-old female patient with a 32 × 30 mm mass in the right liver. INTERVENTIONS: Complete surgical resection of the lesion was performed. DIAGNOSES: Histopathological examination of the resected tumor revealed undifferentiated HCC cells with significant lymphocytes infiltration. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for AFP (alpha fetoprotein), hepatocyte, CK8, and glypican-3. The patient was diagnosed with LEL-HCC. OUTCOMES: The patient had a favorable clinical outcome, and was free from tumor recurrence after a 52-months follow-up. LESSONS: Our case was the youngest patient of all the reported cases, and the third case who was infected with both hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV). LEL-HCC is a rare variant of HCC, with a relatively favorable prognosis. Further research recruiting more patients is required to determine the accurate causes and mechanism of LEL-HCC.

Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by Chinese journals of Traditional Chinese Medicine: a survey of journal editors and review of journals' instructions for authors.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the endorsement of the Consolidation Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement by Chinese journals of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) and its incorporation into their editorial processes. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and major Chinese databases were searched to identify journals of TCM from China for inclusion. The latest 'instruction for authors' (IFA) of each included journal was obtained and any text mentioning CONSORT or CONSORT extension papers was extracted. Subsequently, the editor of each of the included journals was surveyed about their journal's endorsement of the CONSORT recommendations and their incorporation into editorial and peer review processes. RESULTS: Sixty-three journals of TCM from China were examined. Of these, only three (5%) and one (2%) of the 63 journals mentioned the CONSORT statement and extension papers, respectively, in their IFA. Fifty-four of 63 (86%) of surveyed journals responded, with the majority of respondents being editors. Only 20% (11/54) of the respondents reported that they had any knowledge of the CONSORT statement. Only 6% (3/54) of the editors reported that they required authors to comply with the CONSORT statement or that they incorporated it into their peer review and editorial processes. CONCLUSIONS: TCM journals in China endorsing the CONSORT statement constituted a small percentage of the total. The majority of editors surveyed were not familiar with the content of the CONSORT statement and extension papers. We strongly recommend that the China Periodicals Association issue a policy to promote the endorsement of the CONSORT statement and conduct relevant training for journal editors in China.