Revisiting Breast Reduction Insurance Coverage: How the Schnur Scale Discriminates Against Women Based on Body Habitus.

INTRODUCTION: The Schnur scale utilizes body surface area (BSA) to determine the amount of breast tissue resection in reduction mammoplasty, resulting in a greater requirement of breast weight removal in patients with larger BSA. We aimed to demonstrate BSA variance among women with similar mastectomy weights and the range of mastectomy weights among women with comparable BSAs. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent mastectomy from October 2021 to June 2022 was performed. Patients were included if they underwent skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy with a minimum specimen weight of 700g. Patient's BSA, body mass index (BMI), mastectomy weight, and Schnur weight requirement (SWR) were collected. RESULTS: A total of 130 patients (194 breasts) were included. There was significant variance in mean BSA, BMI, SWR, and SWR to mastectomy weight ratio among women with similar mastectomy weights. BSA varied by as much as 0.82 units, BMI varied by as much as 32 kg/m 2, and SWR varied by as much as 1365g within the same mastectomy weight group. There was also significant variance in mastectomy weights among women with comparable BSA, especially in BSA groups>2.20, with the greatest range in mastectomy weights being 1684g. CONCLUSION: Analysis of mastectomy patients showed no predictable relationship between BSA and breast weight. There was significant variance in the BSA of patients with similar breast weights, and conversely in breast weights of patients with comparable BSA. Therefore, strict adherence to the Schnur weight requirement can prevent patients suffering with macromastia from receiving breast reductions.

Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma Awareness: An Analysis of the Responses to an Institutional Campaign and Global Recall.

BACKGROUND: We performed an assessment of patient response rates and clinical outcomes to the global recall for textured breast implants and to our institution's letters informing them of their risk of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL). METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who had textured implants placed at our institution was completed. Outcome measures included patient response rates to either the global recall or our institution's letters, rate of textured implant removal, and type of subsequent revision surgery. RESULTS: A total of 1176 patients with textured implants were reviewed for this study. In total, 374 patients (31.8%) reached out to discuss their risk of BIA-ALCL, and 297 (25.3%) eventually presented to the clinic. One hundred twenty eight patients (34.2%) responded after the letter but before the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ban of macrotextured BIOCELL implants, 186 (49.7%) after the FDA ban, and 48 (12.8%) after the manufacturer's multichannel campaign. One hundred eighteen patients with textured implants (11.6%) proceeded with surgery. Most underwent exchange with smooth implants (76 patients [64.4%]) after textured implant removal. CONCLUSIONS: A significant portion of patients (31.8%) responded to our letters, the FDA ban, and the manufacturer's campaign. Despite the low incidence of BIA-ALCL and the ongoing recommendation for observation in the setting of no symptoms, 11.6% of our patients still elected to proceed with implant removal. Exchange to smooth implants was the most popular surgical option at 64.4%.

Lymphatic Mapping with Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis Surgery: How We Do It.

Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) surgery is an effective surgery for the treatment of lymphedema in the extremities. Indocyanine green lymphography is the reference standard for visualizing lymphatics for LVA surgery, but it has several limitations; most notably, superficial dermal congestion can mask deeper lymphatic vessels. To overcome the limitations, we add contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) lymphography. We have previously reported that CEUS lymphography can identify lymphatic vessels for LVA surgery that indocyanine green lymphography does not. Here, we describe how we perform CEUS lymphography, including workflow, technique, and documentation. Before informed consent, the patient must be screened for possible adverse reactions to microbubbles. The procedure involves multiple intradermal injections of the microbubble agent at various sites along the extremity. After each injection, imaging for microbubble uptake by lymphatic vessels is performed using an ultrasound scanner with contrast-specific software. We use sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres (Lumason/SonoVue; Bracco Suisse SA), but we are investigating the performance of other Food & Drug Administration-approved microbubble agents for CEUS lymphography. Having a systematic approach to marking the skin can mitigate the hindrance of marking over ultrasound coupling gel. Another benefit of CEUS lymphography is the rapid identification of neighboring veins compatible in size and location for anastomosis. We hold regular scheduled multidisciplinary meetings for coordination of care, discussion of outcomes, quality assurance, and ongoing innovation.

Classic Timothy Syndrome Associated With Bilateral Border Digit Syndactyly: A Case Series.

PURPOSE: Timothy syndrome (TS) is characterized by congenital long-QT arrhythmia and limb syndactyly. Patients who undergo syndactyly repair with undiagnosed TS may have their abnormal cardiac electrical activity unmasked during surgery. The purpose of this study was to detail the extremity phenotype seen in patients with TS, which may help hand surgeons in their preoperative assessment. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of all patients with TS seen at our institution from 1998 to 2022. Descriptive statistics regarding their demographics, medical and surgical histories, and syndactyly phenotypes were obtained. RESULTS: Seven patients (5 males and 2 females) with TS were seen at our institution for multidisciplinary evaluation (median age at presentation was 23 months). Six patients had finger syndactyly and 5 had toe syndactyly. One patient did not have any extremity syndactyly and was noted to have a specific TS mutation known to lack musculoskeletal abnormalities. All patients with finger syndactyly had border digit involvement, with 5 out of 6 patients displaying syndactyly of the middle-ring and ring-little finger web spaces. Toe syndactyly was more heterogeneous, with 1 patient lacking any lower extremity syndactyly and others having variable involvement of the second-third, third-fourth, and fourth-little toe web spaces. Complexity ranged from simple to complete. Four patients had intraoperative cardiac events leading to TS diagnoses after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral border digit hand syndactyly, with or without bilateral toe syndactyly, should raise concerns for TS and prompt further investigation into potential cardiac disease to avoid perioperative cardiac morbidity and mortality. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic V.

Periprosthetic Fluid Analysis in the Diagnosis of Breast Implant Infections Using Cell Count and Differential.

BACKGROUND: One of the most devastating complications following implant-based breast reconstruction is periprosthetic infection. Making a prompt and accurate diagnosis has been a challenge as plastic surgeons are limited by nonspecific systemic markers of infection, clinical examination findings, or imaging modalities. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of periprosthetic fluid using cell count and differential as an aid in the diagnosis of infection. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review. The authors selected patients who underwent breast reconstruction and had periprosthetic fluid analysis during the previous 10 years based on CPT 89051 (cell count and differential, body fluid). Only patients with clinical concerns for infection were included (cellulitis, fever, etc.); all others were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 54 samples were included in the study. Twenty-seven samples were associated with periprosthetic breast infections based on positive cultures or intraoperative findings consistent with infection. On fluid analysis, those with infection had a significantly higher neutrophil percentage (84.2% vs 19.3%, P < 0.0001). A cutoff value of 77% neutrophils had a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 93% in diagnosing infection. Delayed treatment in patients with high neutrophil percentage was associated with poorer outcomes. Lastly, there was a strong correlation between higher neutrophil percentage and increased rate of capsular contracture. CONCLUSIONS: Early and accurate diagnosis of periprosthetic breast infections can lead to earlier treatment and potentially improved the outcomes. Aspiration and analysis of periprosthetic fluid for neutrophil percentage can be a reliable method to guide clinical decision making.

Shear wave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry based on a different mechanical model for soft tissue characterization.

Ultrasound vibrometry can measure the propagation velocity of shear waves in soft tissue noninvasively, and the shear moduli of tissue can be estimated inversely from the velocities at multiple frequencies. It is possible to choose the appropriate model for tissue characterization from mathematical methods and analysis of model behaviors. The three classic models, Voigt, Maxwell, and Zener, were applied to fit the velocity measurements and estimate shear moduli of porcine livers with different thermal damage levels and different storage times. The Zener model always provided the best estimation of the moduli with the minimum errors in our experiments. Unlike the Voigt and Maxwell models, the moduli of the Zener model cannot be used to indicate damage levels in porcine livers directly, but the creep and relaxation behaviors of the Zener model are effective.