Treatment and surveillance for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a clinical practice guideline (2021 edition).

Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a major type of bladder cancer with a high incidence worldwide, resulting in a great disease burden. Treatment and surveillance are the most important part of NIMBC management. In 2018, we issued "Treatment and surveillance for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer in China: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline". Since then, various studies on the treatment and surveillance of NMIBC have been published. There is a need to incorporate these materials and also to take into account the relatively limited medical resources in primary medical institutions in China. Developing a version of guideline which takes these two issues into account to promote the management of NMIBC is therefore indicated. We formed a working group of clinical experts and methodologists. Through questionnaire investigation of clinicians including primary medical institutions, 24 clinically concerned issues, involving transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), intravesical chemotherapy and intravesical immunotherapy of NMIBC, and follow-up and surveillance of the NMIBC patients, were determined for this guideline. Researches and recommendations on the management of NMIBC in databases, guideline development professional societies and monographs were referred to, and the European Association of Urology was used to assess the certainty of generated recommendations. Finally, we issued 29 statements, among which 22 were strong recommendations, and 7 were weak recommendations. These recommendations cover the topics of TURBT, postoperative chemotherapy after TURBT, Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) immunotherapy after TURBT, combination treatment of BCG and chemotherapy after TURBT, treatment of carcinoma in situ, radical cystectomy, treatment of NMIBC recurrence, and follow-up and surveillance. We hope these recommendations can help promote the treatment and surveillance of NMIBC in China, especially for the primary medical institutions.

Prostate cancer: updates on current strategies for screening, diagnosis and clinical implications of treatment modalities.

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men by way of diagnosis and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Early detection and intervention remains key to its optimum clinical management. This review provides the most updated information on the recent methods of prostate cancer screening, imaging and treatment modalities. Wherever possible, clinical trial data has been supplemented to provide a comprehensive overview of current prostate cancer research and development. Considering the recent success of immunotherapy in prostate cancer, we discuss cell, DNA and viruses based, as well as combinatorial immunotherapeutic strategies in detail. Furthermore, the potential of nanotechnology is increasingly being realized, especially in prostate cancer research, and we provide an overview of nanotechnology-based strategies, with special emphasis on nanotheranostics and multifunctional nanoconstructs. Understanding these recent developments is critical to the design of future therapeutic strategies to counter prostate cancer.

Imbalance of different types of CD4(+)Foxp3(+) T cells in renal transplant recipients.

AIMS: To determine the number of CD4(+)CD25(-)Foxp3(+), CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) and CD4(+)CXCR5(+)Foxp3(+) T cells in renal transplant recipients that are transplanted stable (TS), or experiencing accelerated rejection (ALR), or acute rejection (AR). METHODS: Renal transplantation was conducted in 28 patients with end-stage renal failure (ESRF). The number of peripheral CD4(+)CD25(-)Foxp3(+), CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+), or CD4(+)CXCR5(+)Foxp3(+) T cells and the serum levels of interleukin-10 (IL-10) were measured in pre- and post-transplant patients and these results were compared to 10 healthy controls (HC). Correlation between CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), CD4(+)CD25(-)Foxp3(+) and serum creatinine (Cr) levels, or Cr and IL-10 levels in TS patients was also determined. RESULTS: The number of CD4(+)CD25(-)Foxp3(+) T cells was significantly increased in patients with ESRF, as compared to HC. Stratification analysis demonstrated that TS patients contained greater numbers of CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) and CD4(+)CXCR5(+)Foxp3(+) T cells, higher levels of serum IL-10, and fewer numbers of CD4(+)CD25(-)Foxp3(+) T cells than ESRF patients. In contrast, ALR and AR patients contained fewer numbers of CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) and CD4(+)CXCR5(+)Foxp3(+) T cells, greater numbers of CD4(+)CD25(-)Foxp3(+) T cells, and lower levels of serum IL-10 than ESRF patients. In TS patients, the numbers of CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) and CD4(+)CD25(-)Foxp3(+) T cells were positively correlated with eGFR and serum Cr levels, respectively. CONCLUSION: An imbalance of different types of CD4(+)Foxp3(+) T cells might be involved in renal transplant rejection.