Relationship Between Cognitive Frailty and Mortality in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To synthesize the pooled mortality risk estimate and determine whether cognitive frailty is a predictor of mortality. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The participants were community-dwelling older adults aged ≥60 years. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched. Two researchers independently screened potentially eligible literature, evaluated the quality of the included studies, and then extracted the data. We used STATA, version 15.0 to perform the all data. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included. The association between cognitive frailty and a higher risk of death was statistically significant [hazard ratio (HR), 2.01; 95% CI, 1.84-2.19; P < .001]. The outcomes indicated that cognitive frailty was a critical risk factor for predicting mortality (OR, 4.82; 95% CI, 1.59-14.57; P < .01). Based on different models of cognitive frailty, the results of subgroup analyses revealed that the risk of mortality was the highest in the Frail + mild cognitive impairment group (HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 2.05-2.70; P < .001). The subgroup analyses by region demonstrated that mortality risk was lowest in the European group (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.4-1.87; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This study quantitatively portrays the pooled mortality risk estimate of cognitive frailty. The results suggest that in older adults, cognitive frailty can be a predictor of mortality. The findings could alert health care providers to pay more attention to cognitive frailty.

Effectiveness of online mindfulness-based interventions for cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Cancer is the second leading cause of mortality worldwide. Cancer negatively affects individuals' quality of life and overall health. Mindfulness-based interventions appear to be promising in the reduction of cancer- and treatment-related symptoms. This review aimed to determine the effectiveness of online mindfulness-based interventions on distress, anxiety, depression, stress, mindfulness, sleep disturbance, quality of life, rumination, fear of cancer recurrence, fatigue and post-traumatic growth among adult cancer patients. METHODS: A literature search was conducted across five electronic databases. Only randomized controlled trials were eligible. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted data, and performed quality assessment using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. Meta-analyses were conducted using review manager software, and standardized mean difference was used to determine intervention effects. Heterogeneity was examined using the I2 statistics. RESULTS: Ten studies were included with a total of 962 participants. Analyses revealed that online mindfulness-based interventions was effective in reducing distress (I2 = 98%；standardized mean difference = -2.21，95% confidence interval: -3.84 to 0.57；P = 0.008)， depression (I2 = 45%；standardized mean difference = -0.33，95% confidence interval: -0.64 to -0.03；P = 0.03), stress (I2 = 97%；standardized mean difference = -2.14，95% confidence interval: -4.24 to -0.03；P = 0.05) and sleep disturbance (I2 = 54%；standardized mean difference = -0.30，95% confidence interval: -0.59 to -0.01；P = 0.04), and improving quality of life (I2 = 94%；standardized mean difference = 0.92，95% confidence interval: 0.09-1.76；P = 0.03). The online mindfulness-based interventions had no significant effects on anxiety, mindfulness, rumination, fear of cancer recurrence, fatigue and post-traumatic growth. Subgroup analyses revealed that online mindfulness-based interventions resulted in higher effect sizes for distress when delivered by website than application, significantly higher effect sizes were also found for online mindfulness-based interventions with guidance, but not on treatment or cancer type. For sleep disturbance, and quality of life, no significant differences between subgroups were found. CONCLUSION: These results provide preliminary support that online mindfulness-based interventions may be feasible and acceptable, which can be used as an adjuvant therapy for the management of cancer-related symptoms among cancer patients.

Social frailty as a predictor of adverse outcomes among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: With the aging of the population, frailty has attracted much attention, and the social dimension of frailty, namely social frailty, has also attracted attention. Studies have shown that social frailty can bring some adverse effects to the elderly, such as physical and cognitive function. AIMS: To explore the risk of adverse health outcomes in older adults with social frailty compared with older adults with non-social frailty. METHODS: Five databases were systematically searched from inception to February 28, 2023. Screening, data extraction and quality assessment were conducted independently by two researchers. The included studies were longitudinal studies of adverse outcomes in community-dwelling socially frail older adults, and the quality of each study was assessed using the Newcastle‒Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies were included based on the inclusion criteria, of which 4 were subjected to meta-analysis. The mean age of the included population ranged from 66.3 to 86.5 years. According to existing research, social frailty was predictive of some adverse outcomes, such as incident disability, depressive symptoms, and reduced neuropsychological function. The meta-analysis showed that social frailty had a significant predictive effect on mortality among older adults [HR = 2.27, (95% CI = 1.03-5.00)]. CONCLUSION: In community-dwelling older adults, social frailty was a predictor of mortality, incident disability, depressive symptoms and other adverse outcomes. Social frailty had a negative impact on older adults, so it was necessary to strengthen the screening of social frailty to reduce the incidence of adverse outcomes.

Effectiveness of interventions in older adults with cognitive frailty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: interventions targeting older adults with cognitive frailty have grown rapidly in recent years with inconsistent findings. However, there is no meta-analysis that has synthesised pooled estimates. OBJECTIVE: to synthesise the pooled effect of current targeted interventions in older people with cognitive frailty. METHODS: we conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, the JBI database and three Chinese databases (CNKI, Wan-Fang and VIP) for literature from the inception of the database until 8 March 2022. The mean difference or standardised mean difference with 95% CIs was calculated. The methodological quality was assessed by the Cochrane RoB 2.0. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE criteria. RESULTS: thirteen randomised controlled trials with a total of 1,089 participants were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that older adults with cognitive frailty in the intervention groups had significant improvement in frailty score [MD = -1.67, 95% CI (-2.39, -0.95), P < 0.00001, I2 = 97%], global cognitive function [MD = 3.38, 95% CI (1.90, 4.85), P < 0.00001, I2 = 93%], mobility [MD = -0.96, 95% CI (-1.27, -1.66), P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%], muscle strength [SMD = 0.75, 95% CI (0.09, 1.41), P = 0.03, I2 = 85%] and nutritional status [MNA:MD = 5.64, 95% CI (3.99, 7.29), P < 0.00001, I2 = 89%; ALB: MD = 3.23, 95% CI (0.76, 5.71), P = 0.01, I2 = 93%; PALB: MD = 54.52, 95% CI (25.26, 83.77), P = 0.0003, I2 = 96%; TRF: MD = 0.64, 95% CI (0.22, 1.06), P = 0.003, I2 = 97%]. The overall certainty of the evidence ranged from low to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: interventions targeting older adults with cognitive frailty are effective in improving physical frailty, global cognitive function, physical function and nutritional status with low to moderate certainty. More research is still needed in the future to further enrich the evidence in these fields. PROSPERO NUMBER: CRD42022318758.

A randomized clinical trial of guided self-help intervention based on mindfulness for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: effects and mechanisms.

BACKGROUND: Compared with face-to-face mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs), online mindfulness interventions may be more convenient for patients with limited resources and can provide self-help mindfulness methods to improve the quality of life of cancer patients. This study investigated the effects of guided self-help mindfulness-based interventions (GSH-MBIs) on psychological distress, quality of life and sleep quality in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and explored the underlying mechanisms. METHODS: A total of 122 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were randomly divided into the intervention group or the conventional treatment group. Psychological distress, quality of life, sleep quality, psychological flexibility and perceived stress were evaluated in the groups before the intervention at baseline, after the intervention, at 1-month follow-up and 3-month follow-up. The intervention's effects over time and the potential mediating effects were analysed using generalized estimating equations (GEE). RESULTS: GEE results indicated significant time-group interaction effects on psychological distress (P < 0.001) and sleep quality (P < 0.001). The intervention significantly improved psychological flexibility (ß, -2.066; 95% CI, -3.631, -0.500) and reduced perceived stress (ß, -2.639; 95% CI, -4.110, -1.169). Psychological flexibility and perceived stress played a mediating role in the observed results. CONCLUSION: GSH-MBIs can improve psychological distress and sleep quality via changing the psychological flexibility and perceived stress in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of frailty: A systematic review.

AIMS: To systematically search for clinical practice guidelines focusing on the prevention and management of frailty, to evaluate their methodological quality and to synthesize the consensus recommendations. DESIGN: A systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Guideline websites, related professional association websites and electronic databases were systematically searched through 4 November 2020. REVIEW METHODS: We evaluated the methodological quality of the eligible guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II). Two reviewers synthesized the consensus recommendations proposed by at least two guidelines. RESULTS: Eight guidelines met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. The mean scores of the six domains were as follows: the 'scope and purpose' domain scored 88.0%, the 'clarity of presentation' domain scored 81.9%, the 'stakeholder involvement' domain scored 63.4%, the 'editorial independence' domain scored 62.2%, the 'rigour of development' domain scored 61.1% and the 'applicability' domain scored 57.8%. In total, we synthesized 23 recommendations for the prevention and management of frailty that are consistent among the included guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The number of clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of frailty is limited. The methodological quality of existing guidelines needs to be improved. Our synthesized findings provide an intuitive, convenient and summative reference resource for frailty prevention and management. It' is worth noting that recommendations described in the included guidelines require additional detail. IMPACT: Although the prevention and management of frailty is urgent, there is currently a lack of evidences guiding these processes, especially in the prevention. The methodological quality of existing guidelines is insufficient, and the recommendations described in the guidelines require additional detail. Therefore, users of these guidelines, especially nurses, should make a careful decision according to the specific situation when using. Nurses also have a key role in providing more clinical evidences for the improvement of the quality of the guidelines.

Prevalence of cognitive frailty among community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the pooled prevalence of cognitive frailty among community-dwelling older adults and provide evidence-based support for policy-makers planning health and social care policies. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched from their inception to December 10, 2020. Descriptive studies (cross-sectional studies or population-based longitudinal studies) and cohort studies were available. Participants were community-dwelling older adults aged 60 years and above. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted the data and evaluated the quality of the included studies. All statistical analyses were conducted using Stata 15.0. RESULTS: We screened 2815 records, among which 24 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The pooled prevalence of cognitive frailty was 9% (95% CI: 8%-11%, I2 = 99.3%). The results of the subgroup analysis showed that the pooled prevalence of cognitive frailty was 11% (95% CI: 9%-14%) in men and 15% (95% CI: 11%-19%) in women. The pooled prevalence of cognitive frailty based on the descriptive studies and cohort studies was 7% (95% CI: 5%-9%) and 17% (95% CI: 11%-22%), respectively. The pooled estimates of cognitive frailty prevalence were 6% (95% CI: 4%-8%) from 2012 to 2017 and 11% (95% CI: 9%-14%) from 2018 to 2020. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review analyzed the available literature and revealed that the pooled prevalence of cognitive frailty among community-dwelling older adults was 9%. The stratified analysis showed that the prevalence of cognitive frailty was higher in older women. In addition, the prevalence has increased in recent years, which has important implications for adapting health and social care systems.

Effects of music intervention on sleep quality of older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Music interventions have several benefits for sleep quality. However, the effects of music interventions on sleep quality in older adults are controversial. OBJECTIVE: To summarize and evaluate the efficacy of music interventions on sleep quality in older adults. METHODS: The Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were systematically retrieved until June 2020, updated on March 13, 2021. Both experimental and quasi-experimental studies were included if they evaluated the efficacy of music interventions on sleep outcomes in older adults. The methodological quality was assessed by the Cochrane RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I Tool. The random effects models and effect measure (MD) were adopted, and sensitivity analysis by omitting each study was conducted to explore the source of heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 489 participants from 9 studies met the inclusion criteria. 6 studies were included in meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis, and 3 studies were included in the qualitative analysis. Main concerns about risk of bias were lack of blinding participants and investigators, and confounding factors might exist in non-RCTs. The Post-hoc meta-analysis indicated that music interventions might have a positive effect on sleep quality [MD = -2.64, 95 % CI (-3.76, -1.53), p <  0.001; I2 = 75.0 %]. Only one study evaluated adverse events and reported zero discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that music interventions might be beneficial for improving sleep quality, especially in sleep latency, sleep duration, sleep efficiency and sleep of daytime dysfunction in elderly individuals.

Effect of exergames on physical outcomes in frail elderly: a systematic review.

AIM: The aim of this systematic review was to understand the exergames that can be applied to the pre-frail and frail elderly people, to evaluate whether these games have a positive impact on physical outcomes in pre-frail and frail older adults, and to explore user's subjective feelings and compliance. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched until January 15, 2019. Only randomized controlled trials published in English for human beings were eligible. The review included studies which examined the effects of exergames on physical outcomes, feasibility and/or subjective feelings of pre-frail and frail older adults. Two researchers assessed the risk bias of all articles independently using the Cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias. RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials with 243 pre-frail and frail older adults met inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Results of the studies were heterogeneous. Physical outcomes (included muscle strength, balance ability, mobility function, gait and falls), subjective feeling outcomes, feasibility, attendance and some other functional outcomes were reported. CONCLUSION: Exergames improved balance and mobility function of frail elderly, and it showed a tendency to increase muscle strength when combined with resistance training. As far as the limited evidence was concerned, exergames were feasible and generally accepted by participants.

Cognitive frailty as a predictor of dementia among older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize the pooled risk effect and to determine whether cognitive frailty is a predictor of dementia among older adults. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched until June 5, 2019. Only cohort studies and population-based longitudinal studies published in English were eligible. Study selection, data extraction and quality assessment of including studies were independently completed by two researchers. A fixed-effects model was used to synthesize the risk of baseline cognitive frailty on dementia in the older adults compared with older adults without cognitive frailty. MEASUREMENTS: The risk of cognitive frailty on incident dementia. RESULTS: Of the 1566 identified records, 7 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. And 4 studies reporting hazard ratio (HR) of incident dementia for cognitive frailty were included in the meta-analysis. Synthesized results showed that baseline cognitive frailty in the elderly was significantly associated with an increased risk of developing dementia as compared with those without cognitive frailty (prefrailty + CI model: pooled HR = 3.99, 95 %CI = 2.94-5.43, p < 0.00001, I2 = 31 %; frailty + CI model: pooled HR = 5.58, 95 %CI = 3.17-9.85, p < 0.00001, I2 = 0 %). Heterogeneity across the studies was low. CONCLUSION: Cognitive frailty is a significant predictor of dementia. Cognitive frailty status may be a novel modifiable target in identification of early signs before dementia.

Effects of Chinese square dancing on older adults with mild cognitive impairment.

The present study aimed to explore the effects of square dancing on global cognition, depressive symptoms, balance, and quality of life of older adults with mild cognitive impairment. We studied 66 older adults with mild cognitive impairment in a large nursing home. Participants were assigned to the intervention group (n = 33) or the control group (n = 33), according to their residential floor, which was determined by coin tossing. The intervention group underwent a 12-week Chinese square dancing routine, while the control group maintained usual lifestyle (without square dancing). Outcomes were assessed at baseline and at weeks 6 and 12. The results showed positive effects of square dancing on all outcomes assessed, especially on depressive symptoms and quality of life-related mental well-being of the participants. This study showed that square dancing is a promising strategy for older adults with mild cognitive impairment and that long-term adherence can be beneficial.