Migration of microorganisms between nitrification-denitrification flocs, anammox biofilms and blank carriers during mainstream anammox start-up.

To solve the shortage of inoculum, the feasibility of establishing simultaneous partial nitrification, anammox, and denitrification (SNAD) reactor through inoculating nitrification-denitrification sludge, anammox biofilm and blank carriers was investigated. Advanced nitrogen removal efficiency of 91.2 ± 3.6 % was achieved. Bacteria related to nitrogen removal and fermentation were enriched in anammox biofilm, blank carriers and flocs, and the abundance of dominant anaerobic ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AnAOB), Candidatus Brocadia, reached 3.4 %, 0.5 % and 0.3 %, respectively. Candidatus Competibacter and Calorithrix became the dominant denitrifying bacteria (DNB) and fermentative bacteria (FB), respectively. The SNAD system was successfully established, and new mature biofilms formed in blank carriers, which could provide inoculum for other anammox processes. Partial nitrification, partial denitrification and aerobic_chemoheterotrophy were existed and facilitated AnAOB enrichment. Microbial correlation networks revealed the cooperation between DNB, FB and AnAOB that promoted nitrogen removal. Overall, the SNAD process was started up through inoculating more accessible inoculum.

Enhancing nitrite production rate made anammox bacteria have a competitive advantage over nitrite oxidizing bacteria in mainstream anammox system.

Nitrite oxidizing bacteria (NOB) is easy to accumulate in the mainstream anammox process, leading to the decrease of anammox bacterial abundance and deterioration of nitrogen removal. In this study, anammox bacteria was gradually enriched by increasing nitrite production rate under intermittent aeration despite high NOB abundance. With the DO increased from 0.4 to 0.6 mg/L, Nitrosomonas increased from 0.14% to 0.22%, providing more nitrite for anammox bacteria and promoting its enrichment (grew by 77.4%). Adding extra nitrite of 7.14 mg N/(L·h) during the aeration phase to reactor could further increase anammox bacterial abundance by 117.6%, which was higher than the control reactor (40.2%). In contrast, NOB abundance decreased from 1.4 × 1010 to 1.2 × 1010 copies/L. The results suggested that anammox bacteria had a competitive advantage for nitrite over NOB with increasing nitrite production rate. In addition, Thauera and Dechloromonas, which were responsible for reducing nitrate to nitrite, provided additional substrates for anammox bacteria. Overall, this research provides a new idea for mainstream anammox applications. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Inhibiting NOB might be no longer necessary and difficult for mainstream anammox. Anammox bacteria competed for more nitrite with NOB when nitrite production rate increased. Increasing DO from 0.4 to 0.6 mg/L facilitated anammox bacterial growth and nitrogen removal.

A novel simultaneous partial nitrification, anammox, denitrification and fermentation process: Enhancing nitrogen removal and sludge reduction in a single reactor.

This study verified the feasibility of simultaneous partial nitrification, anammox, denitrification and fermentation process under intermittent aeration in a single reactor, and explored the impact of dissolved oxygen (DO) on the synergy between fermentation and nitrogen removal. An advanced nitrogen removal efficiency of 92.8 % and a low observed sludge yield of 0.0268-0.1474 kgMLSS/kgCOD were achieved. In-situ test showed that nitrate and ammonium decreased synchronously in the absence of organic matter, indicating the possibility of simultaneous partial denitrification, anammox and fermentation. Additionally, the abundance of functional genes for acetate production was 66,894 hits, while the key genes relevant to methanogenesis were only 348 hits, which suggested that fermentation might stop at the acid-producing stage and promote partial denitrification-anammox reaction, achieving simultaneous sludge reduction and advanced nitrogen removal performance. When DO increased from 0.1-0.3 to 0.4-0.6 mg/L, the nitrogen removal efficiency was increased (63.9 %→92.8 %) while sludge reduction was negatively affected.