RESUMO
Ischemic stroke is a common occurrence worldwide, posing a severe threat to human health and leading to negative financial impacts. Currently available treatments still have numerous limitations. As research progresses, extracellular vesicles are being found to have therapeutic potential in ischemic stroke. In the present study, the literature on extracellular vesicle therapy in animal studies of ischemic stroke was screened by searching databases, including PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. The main outcomes of the present study were the neurological function score, apoptotic rate and infarct volumes. The secondary outcomes were pro-inflammatory factors, including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1ß and IL-6. The study quality was assessed using the CAMARADES Checklist. Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate factors influencing extracellular vesicle therapy. Review Man3ager5.3 was used for data analysis. A total of 20 relevant articles were included in the present meta-analysis. The comprehensive analysis revealed that extracellular vesicles exerted a significant beneficial effect on neurobehavioral function, reducing the infarct volume and decreasing the apoptotic rate. Moreover, extracellular vesicles were found to promote nerve recovery by inhibiting pro-inflammatory factors (TNF-α, IL-1ß and IL-6). On the whole, the present meta-analysis examined the combined effects of extracellular vesicles on nerve function, infarct volume, apoptosis and inflammation, which provides a foundation for the clinical study of extracellular vesicles.
RESUMO
PURPOSE AMG 386 is an investigational peptide-Fc fusion protein (ie, peptibody) that inhibits angiogenesis by preventing the interaction of angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2 with their receptor, Tie2. This first-in-human study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of AMG 386 in adults with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients in sequential cohorts received weekly intravenous AMG 386 doses of 0.3, 1, 3, 10, or 30 mg/kg. Results Thirty-two patients were enrolled on the study and received AMG 386. One occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity was seen at 30 mg/kg: respiratory arrest, which likely was caused by tumor burden that was possibly related to AMG 386. The most common toxicities were fatigue and peripheral edema. Proteinuria (n = 11) was observed without clinical sequelae. Only four patients (12%) experienced treatment-related toxicities greater than grade 1. A maximum-tolerated dose was not reached. PK was dose-linear and the mean terminal-phase elimination half-life values ranged from 3.1 to 6.3 days. Serum AMG 386 levels appeared to reach steady-state after four weekly doses, and there was minimal accumulation. No anti-AMG 386 neutralizing antibodies were detected. Reductions in volume transfer constant (K(trans); measured by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging) were observed in 10 patients (13 lesions) 48 hours to 8 weeks after treatment. One patient with refractory ovarian cancer achieved a confirmed partial response (ie, 32.5% reduction by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) and withdrew from the study with a partial response after 156 weeks of treatment; four patients experienced stable disease for at least 16 weeks. CONCLUSION Weekly AMG 386 appeared well tolerated, and its safety profile appeared distinct from that of vascular endothelial growth factor-axis inhibitors. AMG 386 also appeared to impact tumor vascularity and showed antitumor activity in this patient population.
