The diagnostic value of [18F]FAPI-42 PET/CT for pulmonary artery masses: comparison with [18F]FDG PET/CT.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the potential utility of [18F]fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for evaluating pulmonary artery (PA) masses, and compare it with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT. METHODS: Participants with clinically suspected PA malignancy were prospectively enrolled and underwent dual-tracer PET/CT ([18F]FAPI-42 and [18F]FDG) imaging. Visual analysis and semi-quantitative parameters were compared between the two types of radiotracers. The tissue specimen underwent immunohistochemical staining to verify FAP expression in the tissue. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (18 males/15 females; mean age 53.1 ± 15.4 years) were enrolled. All 21 patients with malignant PA masses were FDG-positive (100%), whereas 20 out of 21 patients were FAPI-positive (95.2%). All 12 patients with benign PA masses were both negative in FDG and FAPI PET. The mean maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and target-to-background ratio (TBR) of FAPI and FDG in malignant PA masses were significantly higher than those of benign masses. Although there was no significant difference in SUVmax between FDG and FAPI in malignant PA masses (11.36 vs. 9.18, p = 0.175), the TBR (liver) and TBR (left ventricle) were more favorable for FAPI than for FDG (13.04 vs. 5.17, p < 0.001); (median: 7.75 vs. 2.75, p = 0.007). Immunohistochemical analysis (n = 16) validated that the level of FAP expression corresponded strongly to the uptake of FAPI in PET/CT scans (rs = 0.712, p = 0.002). For clinical management, FAPI PET found more metastatic lesions than FDG PET in 4 patients, with 2 patients upgrading and 1 patient changing treatment decisions. CONCLUSIONS: FAPI PET/CT is feasible in the diagnosis of PA masses. Although not superior to FDG PET/CT, FAPI PET/CT showed better target-to-background contrast. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study found that FAPI PET/CT is not superior to FDG PET/CT in diagnosing PA masses, but FAPI PET/CT displays better target-to-background contrast and more positive lesions, which may help improve disease management. KEY POINTS: Pulmonary malignancies lack specificity in clinical manifestations, laboratory tests, and routine imaging examinations. FAPI PET/CT is not diagnostically better than FDG PET/CT but displays better target-to-background contrast and more positive lesions. Dual-tracer PET/CT ([18F]FAPI-42 and [18F]FDG) imaging improves clinical management of pulmonary artery masses.

Improving the imaging diagnostic strategy for pulmonary artery masses based on 18F-FDG PET/CT integrated with CTPA.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) for pulmonary artery (PA) masses. METHODS: Of 2889 patients with PA filling defects of PA on CTPA, 79 consecutive patients suspicious for PA malignancy who subsequently underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT were enrolled. All masses were diagnosed on the basis of pathological findings or clinical imaging follow-up. For each mass, morphological CT signs, standardized uptake value (SUVmax and SUVmean), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) on 18F-FDG PET/CT were used as diagnostic markers. RESULTS: Expansive growth, irregular margin, invasion, CT contrast uptake, and wall eclipse sign were strongly associated with the malignant nature of masses. The coexistence of at least 5 CT signs perfectly identified malignant masses, whereas the detection of no more than 4 CT signs did not accurately discriminate between the natures of masses. Mean SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, and TLG values were significantly higher in malignant masses compared to those in benign masses. The diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters (SUV, MTV, and TLG) was excellent in detecting malignant masses. Among patients with 3 or 4 pathological CT signs, SUVmax > 3.4 significantly increased the identification of malignancies. CONCLUSIONS: CTPA is a useful imaging modality for diagnosing PA masses, especially when at least 5 abnormal CT signs are identified. Similarly, 18F-FDG PET/CT accurately identified malignant masses and provided additional valuable information on diagnostic uncertainties after CTPA.

Comment on "Metabolic tumor heterogeneity analysis by F-18 FDG PET/CT predicts mediastinal lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer patients with clinically suspected N2".

With great interest, we read the article "metabolic tumor heterogeneity analysis by F-18 FDG PET/CT predicts mediastinal lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer patients with clinically suspected N2"(by Kisoo Pahk et al., 2018). And we would like to thank the authors for this highly useful work, which raises a few points worthy of discussion.