Outcomes of Single vs. Double Lung Retransplantation in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis.

OBJECTIVE: Patients requiring lung transplant for cystic fibrosis (CF) may require retransplant due to limited graft survival and otherwise excellent life expectancy. Optimal transplant strategy for this population, including single vs. double lung retransplant, has not been established. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the UNOS/OPTN database to identify adult lung retransplant recipients from 2005-2021 with a primary diagnosis of CF. Patients were stratified by retransplant type (single lung [re-SLTx] vs. double lung [re-DLTx] retransplant). Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and multivariable Cox regression were performed. RESULTS: From 2005-2021, 384 recipients underwent retransplant after an initial transplant for an indication of CF; more recipients underwent re-DLTx (N=337 [87.8%]) than re-SLTx (N=47 [12.2%]). The median (IQR) time from initial transplant to retransplant was similar between re-SLTx and re-DLTx recipients (4.4 [2.9-8.6] vs. 4.6 [2.6-7.4] years, p=0.73). Ischemic time was shorter and lung allocation score was lower for re-SLTx than re-DLTx recipients. Median survival after retransplant was significantly shorter for re-SLTx vs. re-DLTx recipients (2.0 [95% CI 1.2-3.5] vs. 4.3 [95% CI 3.5-6.1] years post-retransplant, p=0.008). Median survival for adults with CF undergoing primary transplant for CF in the same period was 9.1 (8.5-9.9) years. After adjusting for donor and recipient characteristics, re-SLTx in patients with CF was associated with 88% higher hazard of mortality than re-DLTx (aHR=1.88 [95% CI 1.28-2.78], p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of lung retransplant in recipients with CF, re-SLTx was associated with a higher hazard of mortality compared to re-DLTx, supporting re-DLTx as treatment for this population.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Stroke After Combined Heart-Kidney and Heart-Liver Transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: While stroke is a well-recognized complication of isolated heart transplantation, stroke in patients undergoing simultaneous heart-liver (HLT) and heart-kidney transplantation (HKT) has not been explored. This study assessed postoperative stroke incidence, risk factors, and outcomes in HLT and HKT compared with isolated heart transplant. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried for adult patients undergoing HLT, HKT, and isolated heart transplants between 1994 and 2022. Patients were stratified by presence of in-hospital stroke after transplant. Post-transplant survival at 1-year was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests. Separate multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to identify risk factors for stroke after HKT and HLT. RESULTS: Of 2326 HKT recipients, 85 experienced stroke, and of 442 HLT recipients, 19 experienced stroke. Stroke was more common after HKT and HLT than after an isolated heart transplant (3.7% vs. 4.3% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.01). One-year post-transplant survival was lower in those with stroke among both HKT recipients (64.5% vs. 88.7%, p(log-rank) < 0.001) and HLT recipients (43.8% vs. 87.4%, p(log-rank) < 0.001. Pre-transplant pVAD, prior stroke, postoperative dialysis, diabetes, prior cardiac surgery, and heart cold ischemic time were independent risk factors for stroke after HKT, after adjusting for age, sex, and need for blood transfusion on the waitlist. For HLT, postoperative dialysis was a significant risk factor. CONCLUSIONS: Stroke is more common after HKT and HLT than after isolated heart transplant, and results in poor survival. Independent risk factors for stroke include pre-transplant percutaneous VAD (HKT) and postoperative dialysis (HKT and HLT).

Reoperative approach after extra-anatomic ascending-to-descending aortic bypass graft.

BACKGROUND: Extra-anatomic ascending-to-descending aortic bypass grafts have historically been utilized as a safe and effective solution for repairs of complex coarctation of the aorta. However, reports on reoperation in these patients remain rare. We present a case of an aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting in a patient with an extra-anatomic ascending-to-descending aortic bypass graft. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient is a 59-year-old male with a complex aortic history, including repair of aortic coarctation with an ascending-to-descending aortic bypass graft 13 years prior, was admitted to the hospital for shortness of breath and chest pain that had developed over the past year. On further workup, he was found to have severe bileaflet aortic valve stenosis, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, and moderate coronary artery disease. He underwent surgical aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting. Given his unique anatomy, cardiopulmonary bypass approach involved separate cannulation of the right axillary and left common femoral arteries with cross-clamp of both the aorta and the extra-anatomic graft. Using this approach, the redo operation was successfully performed. CONCLUSIONS: Reports on reoperation after ascending-to-descending aortic bypass grafting are rare. We describe our approach to cardiopulmonary bypass and reoperation in a patient with an extra-anatomic ascending-to-descending aortic bypass graft.

Impact of dual thoracic recovery from circulatory death donors on heart and lung transplant outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Concomitant heart and lung recovery can result in increased operative complexity, ischemic time, and competition for resources and anatomic territory. Dual thoracic recovery from circulatory death donors may have additional risks that are not fully understood. We investigated the effects of dual heart and lung recovery from circulatory death donors on thoracic transplant outcomes. METHODS: Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we categorized all adult thoracic circulatory death donor transplants from 2019 to 2023 by whether the donor heart, lung, or both (dual donors) were recovered. Heart and lung transplant outcomes were compared between dual recovery donors and heart-only or lung-only donors, respectively, using multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Of the 2513 donors included, 42.9% were heart-only, 45.0% were lung-only, and 12.0% were dual donors. Recipients of dual versus heart-only donors had similar likelihood of post-transplant dialysis (18.9% vs 18.3%, P = .84), likelihood of stroke (2.9% vs 4.7%, P = .34), and 2-year risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 0.90-1.47], P = .26), but lower likelihood of acute rejection (10.2% vs 16.1%, P = .04). Recipients of dual and lung-only donors had similar likelihood of predischarge acute rejection (7.6% vs 8.5%, P = .70), intubation at 72 hours (38.9% vs 45.1%, P = .13), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at 72 hours (13.1% vs 18.1%, P = .11), as well as 2-year risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.16 [95% CI, 0.74-1.82], P = .52). CONCLUSIONS: Recovering both the heart and lungs from a circulatory death donor does not negatively impact transplant outcomes. Outcomes in this population should continue to be investigated as more data and longer-term follow-up become available.

Outcomes of Heart Transplant Using High Donor Sequence Number Offers.

INTRODUCTION: Higher donor sequence numbers (DSNs) might spark provider concern about poor donor quality. We evaluated characteristics of high-DSN offers used for transplant and compared outcomes of high- and low-DSN transplants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult isolated heart transplants between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2022, were identified from the organ procurement and transplantation network database and stratified into high (≥42) and low (<42) DSN. Postoperative outcomes, including predischarge complications, hospital length of stay, and survival at 1 and 3 y, were evaluated using multivariable regressions. RESULTS: A total of 21,217 recipients met the inclusion criteria, with 2131 (10.0%) classified as high-DSN. Donor factors associated with greater odds of high-DSN at acceptance included older age, higher creatinine, diabetes, hypertension, and lower left ventricular ejection fraction. Recipients accepting high-DSN offers were older and more likely to be female, of blood type O, and have lower status at transplant. High- and low-DSN transplants had similar likelihood of stroke (3.2% versus 3.5%; P = 0.97), dialysis (12.3% versus 13.5%; P = 0.12), pacemaker implant (2.3% versus 2.1%; P = 0.64), had similar lengths of stay (16 [12-24] versus 16 [12-25] days, P = 0.38), and survival at 1 (91.6% versus 91.6%; aHR 0.85 [0.72-1.02], P = 0.08) and 3 y (84.2% versus 85.1%; aHR 0.91 [0.79-1.05], P = 0.21) post-transplant. CONCLUSIONS: High-DSN (≥42) was not an independent risk factor for post-transplant mortality and should not be the sole deterrent to acceptance. Accepting high-DSN organs may increase access to transplantation for lower-status candidates.

Utilization and outcomes of expanded criteria donors in adults with congenital heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Use of donation after circulatory death (DCD) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive donors in heart transplantation have increased the donor pool. Given poor waitlist outcomes in the adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) population, we investigated waitlist outcomes associated with willingness to consider DCD and HCV+ offers and post-transplant outcomes following HCV+ and DCD transplantation for these candidates. METHODS: Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we identified adult ACHD candidates and recipients listed or transplanted, respectively, between 01/01/2016 and 09/30/2023 for the HCV analysis and between 12/01/2019 and 09/30/2023 for the DCD analysis. Among candidates, we compared the cumulative incidence of transplant, with waitlist death/deterioration as a competing risk, by willingness to consider HCV+ and DCD offers. Among recipients of HCV+ (vs HCV-) and DCD (vs brain death [DBD]) transplants, we compared perioperative outcomes and post-transplant survival. RESULTS: Of 1,436 ACHD candidates from 01/01/2016 to 09/30/2023, 37.0% were willing to consider HCV+ heart offers. Of 886 ACHD candidates from 12/01/2019 to 09/30/2023, 15.5% were willing to consider DCD offers. On adjusted analysis, willingness to consider HCV+ offers was associated with 84% increased likelihood of transplant, and willingness to consider DCD offers was associated with 56% increased likelihood of transplant. Of 904 transplants between 01/01/2016 and 09/30/2023, 6.4% utilized HCV+ donors, and of 540 transplants between 12/01/2019 and 09/30/2023, 6.9% utilized DCD donors. Recipients of HCV+ (vs HCV-) and DCD (vs DBD) heart transplants had similar likelihood of perioperative outcomes and 1-year survival. CONCLUSIONS: ACHD candidates who were willing to consider HCV+ and DCD offers were more likely to be transplanted and had similar post-transplant outcomes compared to recipients of HCV- and DBD organs.

For your consideration: Benefits of listing as willing to consider heart offers from donors with hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND: Despite excellent outcomes of heart transplants from hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive donors (D+), many candidates are not listed to even consider HCV D+ offers. METHODS: Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified adult (age ≥18 years) heart transplant candidates prevalent on the waitlist between 2018 and March 2023. We compared the likelihood of waitlist mortality or heart transplant by candidate willingness to consider HCV D+ offers using competing risk regression. RESULTS: We identified 19,415 heart transplant candidates, 68.9% of whom were willing to consider HCV D+ offers. Candidates willing to consider HCV D+ offers had a 37% lower risk of waitlist mortality (subhazard ratio [SHR], 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-0.70; P < .001) than candidates not willing to consider HCV D+ offers, after adjustment for covariates and center-level clustering. Over the same period, heart transplant candidates willing to consider HCV D+ offers had a 21% higher likelihood of receiving a transplant (SHR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.7-1.26; P < .001). As a result, among candidates willing to consider HCV D+ offers, 74.9% received a transplant and 6.1% died/deteriorated after 3 years, compared to 68.3% and 9.1%, respectively, of candidates not willing to consider HCV D+ offers. Lower waitlist mortality also was observed on subgroup analyses of candidates on temporary and durable mechanical circulatory support. CONCLUSIONS: Willingness to consider HCV D+ heart offers was associated with a 37% lower risk of waitlist mortality and a 21% higher likelihood of receiving a transplant. We urge providers to encourage candidates to list as being willing to consider offers from donors with hepatitis C to optimize their waitlist outcomes and access to transplantation.

Debunking the July Effect in lung transplantation recipients.

Objective: The "July Effect" is a theory that the influx of trainees from July to September negatively impacts patient outcomes. We aimed to study this theoretical phenomenon in lung transplant recipients given the highly technical nature of thoracic procedures. Methods: Adult lung transplant hospitalizations were identified within the National Inpatient Sample (2005-2020). Recipients were categorized as academic Q1 (July to September) or Q2-Q4 (October to June). In-hospital mortality, operator-driven complications (pneumothorax, dehiscence including wound dehiscence, bronchial anastomosis, and others, and vocal cord/diaphragm paralysis, all 3 treated as a composite outcome), length of stay, and inflation-adjusted hospitalization charges were compared between both groups. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the association between academic quarter and in-hospital mortality and operator-driven complications. The models were adjusted for recipient demographics and transplant characteristics. Subgroup analysis was performed between academic and nonacademic hospitals. Results: Of 30,788 lung transplants, 7838 occurred in Q1 and 22,950 occurred in Q2-Q4. Recipient demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups. Dehiscence (n = 922, 4% vs n = 236, 3%), post-transplant cardiac arrest (n = 532, 2% vs n = 113, 1%), and pulmonary embolism (n = 712, 3% vs n = 164, 2%) were more common in Q2-Q4 versus Q1 recipients (all P < .05). Other operator-driven complications, in-hospital mortality, and resource use were similar between groups (P > .05). These inferences remained unchanged in adjusted analyses and on subgroup analyses of academic versus nonacademic hospitals. Conclusions: The "July Effect" is not evident in US lung transplantation recipient outcomes during the transplant hospitalization. This suggests that current institutional monitoring systems for trainees across multiple specialties, including surgery, anesthesia, critical care, nursing, and others, are robust.

National Incidence, Outcomes, and Management Strategies for Pre- and Post-Transplant Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Transplant Recipients.

Background: Among heart transplant candidates, atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common comorbidity; however, little is known about the impact of pre-transplant AF on incidence of post-transplant AF or other transplant outcomes. Methods: Adult heart transplant recipients transplanted from 07/01/2012 to 07/01/2021 with data available in both the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and Symphony Health pharmacy databases were included. Recipients were categorized by presence of pre-transplant AF using prescription fill data. Perioperative outcomes and survival out to 5 years post-transplant were compared between those with and without pre-transplant AF. Results: Of the 11,789 heart transplant recipients, 2,477 (21.0%) had pre-transplant AF. Pre-transplant AF was associated with an increased likelihood of pre-discharge stroke (aOR 2.13 [95%CI: 1.07-4.26], p=0.03) and dialysis (aOR 1.45 [1.05-2.00], p=0.02), as well as of post-transplant AF at 6 months (aOR 2.42 [1.44-1.48], p=0.001) and 1 year (aOR 2.81 [1.72-4.56], p<0.001). Pre-transplant AF was associated with increased post-transplant mortality at 30 days (aHR 2.39 [1.29-4.44], p=0.006) and 1 year (aHR 1.46 [95% CI: 1.01-2.13], p=0.04), but similar mortality at 5 years (aHR 1.23 [0.96-1.58], p=0.11). Conclusion: Heart transplant recipients with pre-transplant AF had worse short-term outcomes and increased risk of developing post-transplant AF but comparable survival at 5 years post-transplant. Our findings emphasize the importance of increased monitoring for perioperative complications and highlight the long-term safety of heart transplantation in this population. What Is New?: Patients with atrial fibrillation who undergo heart transplantation have worse short term survival (30-days and 1-year) but similar long term survival (5-years) compared to recipients without pre-transplant atrial fibrillation.Pre-transplant atrial fibrillation increases the risk of clinically significant post-transplant atrial fibrillation and peri-operative stroke.Rate vs rhythm control pharmacotherapy for atrial fibrillation is not associated with differences in survival in heart transplant recipients with pre-transplant atrial fibrillation. What are the Clinical Implications?: Atrial fibrillation should not deter heart transplantation in appropriate candidates, though cardiovascular and stroke risk adjustment may be warranted.Use of amiodarone at doses ≤ 200 mg/day is not associated with reduced survival in heart transplant recipients with pre-transplant atrial fibrillation.

Impact of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Bridging Duration on Lung Transplant Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: We sought to characterize the association between venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) bridging duration and outcomes in patients listed for lung transplantation. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) database to identify adults (aged ≥18 years) who were listed for lung transplantation between 2016 and 2020 and were bridged with VV-ECMO. Patients were then stratified into groups, determined by risk inflection points, depending on the amount of time spent on pretransplant ECMO: group 1 (≤5 days), group 2 (6-10 days), group 3 (11-20 days), and group 4 (>20 days). Waiting list survival between groups was analyzed using Fine-Gray competing risk models. Posttransplant survival was compared using Cox regression. RESULTS: Of 566 eligible VV-ECMO bridge-to-lung-transplant patients (median age, 54 years, 49% men), 174 (31%), 124 (22%), 130 (23%), and 138 (24%) were categorized as groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Overall, median duration of VV-ECMO was 10 days (interquartile range, 1-211 days), and 178 patients (31%) died on the waiting list. In the Fine-Gray model, compared with group 1, patients bridged with longer ECMO durations in group 2 (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 2.95; 95% CI, 1.63-5.35), group 3 (SHR, 3.96; 95% CI, 2.36-6.63), and group 4 (SHR, 4.33; 95% CI, 2.59-7.22, all P < .001) were more likely to die on the waiting list. Of 388 patients receiving a transplant, pretransplant ECMO duration was not associated with 1-year survival in Cox regression. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged duration of ECMO bridging was associated with worse waiting list mortality but did not impact survival after lung transplant. Prioritization of very early transplantation may improve waiting list outcomes in this population.

Changes in Donor Utilization and Outcomes for Patients Bridged With Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device.

We studied the impact of the 2018 heart allocation policy change on donor characteristics and posttransplant outcomes of left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-bridged heart transplant (HT) recipients. Left ventricular assist device-bridged adult HT recipients from October 2014 to October 2022 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were categorized into old allocation policy (OAP) and new allocation policy (NAP) cohorts. Baseline characteristics, posttransplant outcomes, and subgroup analyses of unstable and stable LVAD-bridged recipients were assessed. The study included 7,384 HT recipients; 4,345 (58.8%) were transplanted in the OAP era and 3,039 (41.2%) in the NAP era. Old allocation policy recipients were most frequently status 1A at transplantation (71.1%), whereas NAP recipients were most frequently status 3 (40.0%), and status 4 (31.9%). Median donor sequence number (DSN) was higher in the NAP versus OAP era (9 vs. 3, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, NAP recipients had 20% higher 1 year mortality compared to OAP (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.20 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.04-1.40], p = 0.01). Status 1 or 2 recipients had 28% higher 1 year mortality compared to status 1A (aHR = 1.28 [95% CI: 1.01-1.63], p = 0.04). Status 1 and 2 LVAD-supported recipients had higher mortality following the 2018 allocation change, indicating the need for closer surveillance of LVAD-bridged patients who may decompensate on the waitlist.

Bigger pies, bigger slices: Increased hospitalization costs for lung transplantation recipients in the non-donation service area allocation era.

OBJECTIVE: On November 24, 2017, lung transplant allocation switched from donation service area to a 250-nautical mile radius policy to improve equity in access to lung transplantation. Given the growing consideration of healthcare costs, we evaluated changes in hospitalization costs after this policy change. METHODS: Lung transplant hospitalizations were identified within the National Inpatient Sample from 2005 to 2020. Recipients were categorized as donation service area era (August 2015 to October 2017) or non-donation service area era (December 2017 to February 2020). Median total hospitalization costs (inflation adjusted) were compared by era nationally and regionally. Multivariable generalized linear regression was performed to determine if the removal of the donation service area was associated with total hospitalization costs. The model was adjusted for recipient demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index, hospitalization region, transplant type (single, double), and use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ex vivo lung perfusion, and mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: We analyzed 12,985 lung transplant recipients (median age of 61 years, 66% were male): 7070 in the donation service area era and 5915 in the non-donation service area era. Demographics were not different between recipients in both eras. Non-donation service area era recipients had greater extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use, mechanical ventilation (<24 hours), and longer length of stay than donation service area era recipients. Median total hospitalization costs for non-donation service area versus donation service area era recipients increased by $24,198 ($157,964 vs $182,162, percentage change = 15.32%, P < .001). Median costs increased in East North Central ($42,281) and Mountain ($35,521) regions (both P < .01). After adjustment, median costs for non-donation service area versus donation service area era recipients still increased ($19,168, 95% CI, 145-38,191, P = .048). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalization costs for lung transplant hospitalizations have increased from 2015 to 2020. The transition from donation service area-based allocation to the non-donation service area system may have contributed to this increase after 2017 by increasing access to transplant for sicker recipients.

Special Considerations for Advanced Heart Failure Surgeries: Durable Left Ventricular Devices and Heart Transplantation.

Heart transplantation and durable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) represent two definitive therapies for end-stage heart failure in the modern era. Despite technological advances, both treatment modalities continue to experience unique risks that impact surgical and perioperative decision-making. Here, we review special populations and factors that impact risk in LVAD and heart transplant surgery and examine critical decisions in the management of these patients. As both heart transplantation and the use of durable LVADs as destination therapy continue to increase, these considerations will be of increasing relevance in managing advanced heart failure and improving outcomes.

Outcomes following concomitant multiorgan heart transplantation from circulatory death donors: The United States experience.

BACKGROUND: Donation after circulatory death (DCD) has reemerged as a method of expanding the donor heart pool. Given the high waitlist mortality of multiorgan heart candidates, we evaluated waitlist outcomes associated with willingness to consider DCD offers and post-transplant outcomes following DCD transplant for these candidates. METHODS: We identified adult multiorgan heart candidates and recipients between January 1, 2020 and March 31, 2023 nationally. Among candidates that met inclusion criteria, we compared the cumulative incidence of transplant, with waitlist death/deterioration as a competing risk, by willingness to consider DCD offers. Among recipients of DCD versus brain death (DBD) transplants, we compared perioperative outcomes and post-transplant survival. RESULTS: Of 1,802 heart-kidney, 266 heart-liver, and 440 heart-lung candidates, 15.8%, 12.4%, and 31.1%, respectively, were willing to consider DCD offers. On adjusted analysis, willingness to consider DCD offers was associated with higher likelihood of transplant for all multiorgan heart candidates and decreased likelihood of waitlist deterioration for heart-lung candidates. Of 1,100 heart-kidney, 173 heart-liver, and 159 heart-lung recipients, 5.4%, 2.3%, and 2.5%, respectively, received DCD organs. Recipients of DCD and DBD heart-kidney transplants had a similar likelihood of perioperative outcomes and 1-year survival. All other DCD multiorgan heart recipients have survived to the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Multiorgan heart candidates who were willing to consider DCD offers had favorable waitlist outcomes, and heart-kidney recipients of DCD transplants had similar post-transplant outcomes to recipients of DBD transplants. We recommend the use of DCD organs to increase the donor pool for these high-risk candidates.

Unusual presentation and delayed diagnosis of cardiac angiosarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Primary cardiac angiosarcomas are very rare and present aggressively with high rates of metastasis. Given the poor prognosis, particularly once disease has spread, early diagnosis and multidisciplinary treatment is essential. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 46-year-old male who presented with chest pain, intermittent fevers, and dyspnea. Workup with computed tomography scan and transesophageal echocardiography demonstrated a right atrial pseudoaneurysm. Given the concern for rupture, the patient was taken to the operating room, where resection of the pseudoaneurysm and repair using a bovine pericardial patch was performed. Histopathology report initially demonstrated perivascular lymphocyte infiltrate. Six weeks later, the patient represented with chest pain and new word finding difficulty. Workup revealed multiple solid lung, pericardial, brain, and bone nodules. Eventual biopsy of a cardiophrenic nodule demonstrated angiosarcoma, and rereview of the original pathology slides confirmed the diagnosis of primary cardiac angiosarcoma. CONCLUSIONS: Primary cardiac angiosarcomas are often misdiagnosed given the rarity of these tumors, but early diagnosis and initiation of treatment is essential. The unique presentation of our case demonstrates that clinical suspicion for cardiac angiosarcoma should be maintained for spontaneous pseudoaneurysm originating from the right atrium.

Kidney Donation After Circulatory Death Using Thoracoabdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion: The Largest Report of the United States Experience.

BACKGROUND: Thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP) has been increasingly used for donation after circulatory death (DCD) procurements in the United States. We present the largest report of outcomes of kidney transplants performed using DCD donor grafts perfused with TA-NRP. METHODS: Adult DCD kidney transplants between 2020 and 2022 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were included. Donors with ≥50 min between asystole and aortic cross-clamp time in which the heart was also transplanted were considered TA-NRP donors. All other donors were considered direct recovery donors. Multivariable regressions were used to assess delayed graft function, as well as posttransplant survival and all-cause graft failure at 30, 90, and 180 d. A propensity-matched analysis of cohorts matched on donor Kidney Donor Profile Index was performed. RESULTS: Of the 16 140 total DCD kidney transplants performed during the study period, 306 (1.9%) used TA-NRP. TA-NRP donors were younger ( P < 0.001) and had lower Kidney Donor Profile Index ( P < 0.001) compared with direct recovery donors. Recipients receiving grafts recovered using TA-NRP were younger ( P < 0.001) and more likely to be blood group O ( P < 0.001). Transplants using TA-NRP had lower likelihood of delayed graft function (adjusted odds ratio 0.22 [95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.31], P < 0.001) but similar 180-d survival ( P = 0.8) and all-cause graft failure ( P = 0.3) as transplants using direct recovery grafts. These inferences were unchanged on propensity-matched analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that kidney transplants using TA-NRP DCD allografts have positive short-term mortality and graft survival outcomes, with significantly decreased rates of delayed graft function compared with direct recovery DCD grafts.

Outcomes of Recipients Aged 65 Years and Older Bridged to Lung Transplant With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to lung transplant (BTT) has been used for critically ill candidates with excellent outcomes, but data on this strategy in older recipients remain limited. We compared outcomes of no BTT, mechanical ventilation (MV)-only BTT, and ECMO BTT in recipients of greater than or equal to 65 years. Lung-only recipients of greater than or equal to 65 years in the United Network for Organ Sharing database between 2008 and 2022 were included and stratified by bridging strategy. Of the 9,936 transplants included, 226 (2.3%) were MV-only BTT and 159 (1.6%) were ECMO BTT. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation BTT recipients were more likely to have restrictive disease pathology, had higher median lung allocation score, and spent fewer days on the waitlist (all p < 0.001). Compared to no-BTT recipients, ECMO BTT recipients were more likely to be intubated or on ECMO at 72 hours posttransplant and had longer hospital lengths of stay (all p < 0.001). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation BTT recipients had increased risk of 3 years mortality compared to both no-BTT (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.48 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.14-1.91], p = 0.003) and MV-only recipients (aHR = 1.50 [95% CI: 1.08-2.07], p = 0.02). Overall, we found that ECMO BTT in older recipients is associated with inferior posttransplant outcomes compared to MV-only or no BTT, but over half of recipients remained alive at 3 years posttransplant.

Uptake and 1-year outcomes of lung transplantation for COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: End-stage lung disease from severe COVID-19 infection is an increasingly common indication for lung transplantation (LT), but there are limited data on outcomes. We evaluated 1-year COVID-19 LT outcomes. METHODS: We identified all adult US LT recipients January 2020 to October 2022 in the Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients, using diagnosis codes to identify recipients transplanted for COVID-19. We used multivariable regression to compare in-hospital acute rejection, prolonged ventilator support, tracheostomy, dialysis, and 1-year mortality between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 recipients, adjusting for donor, recipient, and transplant characteristics. RESULTS: LT for COVID-19 increased from 0.8% to 10.7% of total LT volume during 2020 to 2021. The number of centers performing LT for COVID-19 increased from 12 to 50. Recipients transplanted for COVID-19 were younger; were more likely to be male and Hispanic; were more likely to be on a ventilator, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, and dialysis pre-LT; were more likely to receive bilateral LT; and had higher lung allocation score and shorter waitlist time than other recipients (all P values < .001). COVID-19 LT had higher risk of prolonged ventilator support (adjusted odds ratio, 2.28; P < .001), tracheostomy (adjusted odds ratio 5.3; P < .001), and longer length of stay (median, 27 vs 19 days; P < .001). Risk of in-hospital acute rejection (adjusted odds ratio, 0.99; P = .95) and 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.73; P = .12) were similar for COVID-19 LTs and LTs for other indications, even accounting for center-level differences. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 LT is associated with higher risk of immediate postoperative complications but similar risk of 1-year mortality despite more severe pre-LT illness. These encouraging results support the ongoing use of LT for COVID-19-related lung disease.