A rhinopithecus swarm optimization algorithm for complex optimization problem.

This paper introduces a novel meta-heuristic algorithm named Rhinopithecus Swarm Optimization (RSO) to address optimization problems, particularly those involving high dimensions. The proposed algorithm is inspired by the social behaviors of different groups within the rhinopithecus swarm. RSO categorizes the swarm into mature, adolescent, and infancy individuals. Due to this division of labor, each category of individuals employs unique search methods, including vertical migration, concerted search, and mimicry. To evaluate the effectiveness of RSO, we conducted experiments using the CEC2017 test set and three constrained engineering problems. Each function in the test set was independently executed 36 times. Additionally, we used the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the Friedman test to analyze the performance of RSO compared to eight well-known optimization algorithms: Dung Beetle Optimizer (DBO), Beluga Whale Optimization (BWO), Salp Swarm Algorithm (SSA), African Vultures Optimization Algorithm (AVOA), Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), Atomic Retrospective Learning Bare Bone Particle Swarm Optimization (ARBBPSO), Artificial Gorilla Troops Optimizer (GTO), and Harris Hawks Optimization (HHO). The results indicate that RSO exhibited outstanding performance on the CEC2017 test set for both 30 and 100 dimension. Moreover, RSO ranked first in both dimensions, surpassing the mean rank of the second-ranked algorithms by 7.69% and 42.85%, respectively. Across the three classical engineering design problems, RSO consistently achieves the best results. Overall, it can be concluded that RSO is particularly effective for solving high-dimensional optimization problems.

Pair barracuda swarm optimization algorithm: a natural-inspired metaheuristic method for high dimensional optimization problems.

High-dimensional optimization presents a novel challenge within the realm of intelligent computing, necessitating innovative approaches. When tackling high-dimensional spaces, traditional evolutionary tools often encounter pitfalls, including dimensional catastrophes and a propensity to become trapped in local optima, ultimately compromising result accuracy. To address this issue, we introduce the Pair Barracuda Swarm Optimization (PBSO) algorithm in this paper. PBSO employs a unique strategy for constructing barracuda pairs, effectively mitigating the challenges posed by high dimensionality. Furthermore, we enhance global search capabilities by incorporating a support barracuda alongside the leading barracuda pair. To assess the algorithm's performance, we conduct experiments utilizing the CEC2017 standard function and compare PBSO against five state-of-the-art natural-inspired optimizers in the control group. Across 29 test functions, PBSO consistently secures top rankings with 9 first-place, 13 second-place, 5 third-place, 1 fourth-place, and 1 fifth-place finishes, yielding an average rank of 2.0345. These empirical findings affirm that PBSO stands as the superior choice among all test algorithms, offering a dependable solution for high-dimensional optimization challenges.

A novel hermit crab optimization algorithm.

High-dimensional optimization has numerous potential applications in both academia and industry. It is a major challenge for optimization algorithms to generate very accurate solutions in high-dimensional search spaces. However, traditional search tools are prone to dimensional catastrophes and local optima, thus failing to provide high-precision results. To solve these problems, a novel hermit crab optimization algorithm (the HCOA) is introduced in this paper. Inspired by the group behaviour of hermit crabs, the HCOA combines the optimal search and historical path search to balance the depth and breadth searches. In the experimental section of the paper, the HCOA competes with 5 well-known metaheuristic algorithms in the CEC2017 benchmark functions, which contain 29 functions, with 23 of these ranking first. The state of work BPSO-CM is also chosen to compare with the HCOA, and the competition shows that the HCOA has a better performance in the 100-dimensional test of the CEC2017 benchmark functions. All the experimental results demonstrate that the HCOA presents highly accurate and robust results for high-dimensional optimization problems.