Short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (UBE-TLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases by meta-analysis. METHODS: A computer-based search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, and Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP) was conducted from the inception of the each database to April 2023. The searched literature was then screened according to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. The critical data were extracted and analyzed using Review Manager software5.4.1. Pooled effects were calculated on the basis of data attributes by mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of the studies. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies and 949 patients met the inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis, 445 in the UBE-LIF group and 504 in the MIS-TLIF group. UBE-TLIF was superior to MIS-TLIF in terms of intraoperative blood flow, postoperative drainage flow, duration of hospital stay, VAS score for low back pain and ODI score, but the operative time was longer than MIS-TLIF group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of total complication rate, modified Macnab grading criteria, fusion rate, VAS score of leg pain, lumbar lordosis, intervertebral disk height. CONCLUSION: Both UBE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF are effective surgical modalities for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases. They have similar treatment outcomes, but UBE-TLIF has the advantages of less intraoperative blood loss, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and faster recovery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study has been registered at INPLASY.COM (No. INPLASY202320087).

Vertebral coplanar alignment technique: a surgical option for correction of adult thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.

PURPOSE: Previous studies have demonstrated vertebral coplanar alignment (VCA) as an effective surgical option for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The purpose of this study is to analyze the outcome of VCA for the surgical correction of adult idiopathic scoliosis (AdIS). METHODS: 35 AdIS patients (mean age: 24.2 years) undergoing VCA-instrumentation were reviewed. The main thoracic curve and thoracic kyphosis (TK, T5-T12) were evaluated preoperatively, immediate postoperatively, and at the final follow-up (>1 year). All patients were stratified by the TK modifier before surgery: "+" (TK, >40°), "-" (TK, <10°), and "N" (TK, 10°-40°) for normal. The apical vertebral body-to-rib ratio (AVB-R), rib hump (RH), and rotational angle to sacrum (RAsac) were measured to assess the correction of rotational deformity. Quality of life was evaluated with SRS-20 questionnaires. RESULTS: The main thoracic curve (59.1° vs. 19.3°, P < 0.001) and rotational deformity (AVB-R: 2.4 vs. 1.7 %, P < 0.001, RH: 34.9 vs. 19.1 mm, P < 0.001, RAsac: 19.6° vs. 11.9°, P < 0.001) were significantly reduced with surgery. Sagittal deformity improved significantly in group "+" (51.4° vs. 31.6°, P < 0.001) and group "-" (6.2° vs. 20.1°, P < 0.001), while no significant postoperative change in TK was observed in group "N" (23.5° vs. 26.3°, P = 0.270). Patients were followed for an average of 18.7 months with no significant loss of correction. SRS scores improved greatly from 57.7 preoperatively to 71.6 at the final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: VCA can be effectively used for the correction of the coronal and rotational deformity, with better sagittal profile restoration in adult thoracic idiopathic scoliosis with sagittal malalignment.

[Restoration of the difference value of pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis in degenerative scoliosis patients: its influence in maintaining sagittal profile and improving quality of life].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role that post-operative difference value of pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) played on loss of correction, implant failure and health-related quality of life during follow-up in degenerative scoliosis patients. METHODS: Retrospective review of 62 patients (average age (57 ± 10) years, 11 male and 51 female patients) with degenerative scoliosis who underwent one stage posterior surgical instrumentation in the affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School from January 2005 to December 2011. The mean follow-up duration was 4.2 years. Long-cassette standing upright sagittal radiographs were obtained before and after operation and at the last follow-up. At the last follow-up, visual analogue scale and Oswestry disability index were collected. Based on post-operative PI-LL, patients were divided into two groups: group A (-9° < post-operative PI-LL<9°) and group B (post-operative PI-LL < -9°or post-operative PI-LL>9°). Independent t test and χ(2) test were performed for statistical analysis. For all statistical analysis, the level of significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: No difference was observed in terms of loss of correction between two groups during follow-up. More implant failure were observed in group B (15.63% vs. 6.7%, χ(2) = 21.85, P = 0.012). In addition, patients with better PI-LL matching came with better visual analogue scale (3.9 ± 2.4 vs. 5.2 ± 3.3, F = 0.089, P = 0.024). CONCLUSION: Worse quality of life and increased risk for implant failure during follow-up may be related to mismatched PI-LL.

[Effect of intervertebral disc degeneration on spinal flexibility in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate degenerative changes of the intervertebral disc and their impact on spinal flexibility in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 66 patients (average age 58.4 years, 10 males and 56 females) with DLS was conducted from May 2008 to February 2014. For all patients, pre-operative standing X-ray film, Bending X-ray films and thoracolumbar MRI were taken. Cobb's angle was measured in each X-ray film and intervertebral angle was measured in both standing and Bending X-ray films. All discs were graded according to Pfirrmann degeneration grades on T2 weighted saggital MRI imaging. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the correlation between intervertebral disc degeneration with the whole spine flexibility and segmental flexibility. RESULTS: For all 66 subjects, the average Cobb's angle of pre-operative and bending X-ray film was 36° ± 13°, 21° ± 11°, respectively. The average flexibility was 45% ± 15% in our study. Totally 268 discs were graded, including gradeI8, II 68, III 83, IV 91, V 18. In the main curve, there was significant correlation between the average degree of disc degeneration and the whole spine flexibility(r = -0.727, P < 0.01). There was significant correlation between the grade of segmental disc degeneration and segmental flexibility (P < 0.01) . The apical intervertebral disc had the most degeneration (P < 0.01) and worst flexibility (P < 0.01) , compared with other discs in the main curve. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of intervertebral disc degeneration is closely correlated with spinal flexibility in DLS. The more the disc degeneration is, the worse the spinal flexibility becomes.