Relationship between urate within tophus and bone erosion according to the anatomic location of urate deposition in gout: A quantitative analysis using dual-energy CT volume measurements.

The aim of this study was to measure the urate volume within tophus and bone erosion volume using dual-energy computed tomography in patients with tophaceous gout. Furthermore, our study aims to quantitatively analyze the relationship between monosodium urate (MSU) crystal deposition and bone erosion according to the anatomic location of urate deposition.Seventy-seven subjects with chronic gout were positively identified for the presence of urate deposition. Only 27 subjects identified for the presence of urate in contact with bone erosion were included in this study. The urate volumes and associated erosion volumes were measured. The relationships between urate within tophus and bone erosion were separately analyzed according to the anatomic location of urate deposition.Twenty-seven subjects were all male (100%) with a median (interquartile range, IQR) age of 52 (45-61) years. From all the subjects, 103 tophi depositions were identified in contact with bone erosion, including 58/103 tophi that contained an intraosseous component and 45/103 nonintraosseous tophi. Tophi containing intraosseous components were larger than nonintraosseous tophi (urate volume: median [IQR] 45.64 [4.79-250.89] mm vs 19.32 [6.97-46.71] mm, P = .035) and caused greater bone erosion (erosion volume: 249.03 [147.08-845.33] mm vs 69.07 [32.88-111.24] mm, P < .001). Almost all erosion volumes were larger than urate volumes in nonperiarticular tophi, in contrast to most erosion volumes, which were less than urate volumes in the tophi that contained a periarticular component (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval: 74.00, 14.70-372.60; P < .001). Urate volume and erosion volume demonstrated positive correlations in intraosseous tophi, intraosseous-intra-articular-periarticular tophi, and intraosseous-intra-articular tophi (rs = 0.761, rs = 0.695, rs = 0.629, respectively, P < .05).MSU crystal deposition shows a promoting effect on the development of bone erosions in varying degrees, associated with the location of MSU crystals deposited in the joints. The intraosseous tophi contribute the most to bone erosions, followed by intra-articular tophi, and periarticular tophi.

Ascending aortic dilatation rate after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic stenosis: A multidetector computed tomography follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Current data is lacking about the progression of ascending aortic dilatation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in aortic stenosis (AS) patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV). This study aims to assess the ascending aortic dilatation rate (mm/year) after TAVR in patients with BAV versus TAV using a multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) follow-up and to determine the predictors of ascending aortic dilatation rate. METHODS: Severe AS patients undergoing TAVR from March 2013 to March 2018 at our center with MDCT follow-ups were included. BAV and TAV were identified using baseline MDCT. Baseline and follow-up MDCT images were analyzed, and the diameters of ascending aorta were measured. Study end point is ascending aortic dilatation rate (mm/year). Furthermore, factors predicting ascending aortic dilatation rate were also investigated. RESULTS: Two hundred and eight patients were included, comprised of 86 BAV and 122 TAV patients. Five, 4, 3, 2, and 1-year MDCT follow-ups were achieved in 7, 9, 30, 46, and 116 patients. The ascending aortic diameter was significantly increased after TAVR in both BAV group (43.7±4.4 mm vs. 44.0±4.5 mm; P<0.001) and TAV group (39.1±4.8 mm vs. 39.7±5.1 mm; P<0.001). However, no difference of ascending aortic dilatation rate was found between BAV and TAV group (0.2±0.8 mm/year vs. 0.3±0.8 mm/year, P=0.592). Multivariate linear regression revealed paravalvular leakage (PVL) grade was independently associated with ascending aortic dilatation rate in the whole population and BAV group, but not TAV group. No aortic events occurred during follow-ups. CONCLUSION: Ascending aortic size continues to grow after TAVR in BAV patients, but the dilatation rate is mild and comparable to that of TAV patients. PVL grade is associated with ascending aortic dilatation rate in BAV patients post-TAVR.

First-in-man implantation of the retrievable and repositionable VenusA-Plus valve.

BACKGROUND: No retrievable and repositionable second generation transcatheter aortic valve is available in China. Here, we report the first-in-man implantation of the retrievable and repositionable VenusA-Plus valve. METHODS: A 76-year-old patient with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and high surgical risk (STS 13.8%) was recommended for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) by heart valve team. Type 0 bicuspid aortic valve with asymmetric calcification was identified by dual source computed tomography, and the unfavorable anatomies increased the possibility of malposition and paravalvular leakage during TAVR. Therefore, we used the retrievable and repositionable VenusA-Plus valve for the patient. RESULTS: Transfemoral TAVR was performed under local anesthesia with sedation, and a 26mm VenusA-Plus valve was successfully implanted. No transvalvular pressure gradient and trace paravalvular leakage were found. CONCLUSION: The successful first-in-man implantation indicates the retrievable and repositionable VenusA-Plus valve is feasible in complicated TAVR cases such as bicuspid aortic valve.

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with a severe stenotic bicuspid aortic valve in a Chinese population.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with a severe stenotic bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) in a Chinese population. While several groups have reported the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of TAVI for patients with a BAV, worldwide experience of the technique is still limited, especially in China. METHODS: From March 2013 to November 2014, high surgical risk or inoperable patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) who had undergone TAVI at our institution were selected for inclusion in our study. RESULTS were compared between a BAV group and a tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) group. RESULTS: Forty patients were included in this study, 15 (37.5%) of whom were identified as having a BAV. In the BAV group, the aortic valve area was smaller ((0.47±0.13) vs. (0.59±0.14) cm(2)), the ascending aortic diameter was larger ((40.4±4.4) vs. (36.4±4.3) mm), and the concomitant aortic regurgitation was lower. No significant differences were found between the groups in the other baseline characteristics. No differences were observed either in the choice of access or valve size. The procedural success achieved in this study was 100%. There were no differences between groups in device success (86.7% vs. 88.0%), 30-d mortality (6.7% vs. 8.0%), or 30-d combined end point (13.3% vs. 12.0%). The incidences of new pacemaker implantation, paravalvular regurgitation and other complications, recovery of left ventricle ejection fraction and heart function were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a severely stenotic BAV can be treated with TAVI, and their condition after treatment should be similar to that of people with a TAV.

Methods of assessment of tophus and bone erosions in gout using dual-energy CT: reproducibility analysis.

This study aims to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of the tophus urate volume, erosion volume, and the erosion score measurements in patients with gout by using dual-energy CT (DECT) scans comparing their bone erosion volumes against bone erosion scores and also to determine a valid measure of joint destruction in chronic gout. Sixty-six subjects underwent DECT scans of the hands or feet. Two independent observers measured the tophus urate volumes and bone erosion volumes using automated volume assessment software and the erosion scores based on the rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging score (RAMRIS). The intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility were analyzed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and limits of agreements analysis. The relationship between erosion volumes and erosion scores was analyzed. The intraobserver and interobserver ICC for tophus urate volume measurements (n = 636) were 1.000 (95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) 1.000 to 1.000) and 1.000 (95 % CI 1.000 to 1.000), 0.999 (0.999, 0.999) and 0.999 (0.999, 0.999) for bone erosion volumes (n = 350), 0.937 (0.928, 0.946) and 0.899 (0.883, 0.912) for erosion scores (n = 350). Strong positive correlations were demonstrated between individual erosion volumes and scores (r s = 0.914, p < 0.001) as well as total erosion volume and score per patient (r = 0.838-0.867, p < 0.001). This study demonstrated a high reproducibility of tophus urate volumes, erosion volumes, and erosion score measurements using DECT. Erosion volumes show to be a more direct and accurate method to evaluate bone erosion compared with erosion score, strongly supporting it as a superior and standard measure of structural joint damage in gout.