Teledermatology in remote Indigenous populations: Lessons learned and paths to explore, an experience from Canada (Québec) and Australia.

Objective: Recent introduction of a provincially funded and administered teledermatology platform in Quebec presents a major opportunity to improve healthcare delivery to rural Indigenous communities where healthcare is suboptimal. In this study, we assessed approaches, challenges, solutions, and outcomes in implementing teledermatology in rural Indigenous communities of Australia and Canada. Methods: A narrative review was performed using journal articles and grey literatures to assess challenges encountered in Canadian and Australian teledermatology programs in rural Indigenous communities. We then conducted a focused search to identify solutions and outcomes to these challenges. We identified four main areas of focus for implementing teledermatology: financial, cultural, legal, and provider competency. Results: Main financial concerns included identifying the cost-to-benefit ratio of teledermatology and financial benefits of the store-and-forward system compared to videoconferencing. Delivery of teledermatology through culturally considerate services is crucial to mend the mistrust felt by Indigenous people toward mainstream health services. From a legal standpoint, patient confidentiality and physician liability must be considered. A uniform teledermatology platform and physician competency in both telemedicine and dermatology are needed to ensure standard of care. Conclusion: Teledermatology initiatives represent great opportunities to improve healthcare services to rural Indigenous populations.

Safety of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children and adults with mast cell disorders.

Mastocytosis is characterized by abnormal clonal mast cell proliferation. Given the paucity of data in patients with mastocytosis, it is crucial to assess the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in this population. We aimed to assess the risk of allergic reactions and the effect of COVID-19 infection among patients with mastocytosis. Participants were recruited from Canada and Israel between December 2021 and May 2022. Consenting participants were administered standardized questionnaires querying whether they were infected with COVID-19, if they received the first and second dose vaccines, and post-vaccination side effects including allergic reactions (urticaria/angioedema, current rash flaring, need for updosing medications, or respiratory symptoms) and common side effects including injection site reaction (ISR) and flu-like symptoms. Forty participants with mastocytosis were administered a standardized questionnaire (median age = 9, 59% male). Amongst all participants, 16 (39%) reported COVID-19 infection and most (75%) reported flu-like symptoms, 3 (19%) were asymptomatic, 1 suffered from shortness of breath/chest pain and 1 from facial flushing. Of the 25 participants who were eligible for vaccination (≥ 5 years old), 80% received a first-dose vaccine and 68% received a second-dose vaccine. Of those who received the first-dose vaccine, most (60%) remained asymptomatic, 20% developed flu-like symptoms, 20% had an ISR, and 1 patient had an allergic reaction (urticaria and swelling). Of those who received the second-dose vaccine, most (53%) were asymptomatic, and 1 had an allergic reaction. No significant difference was found between side effects of both vaccine doses. No reactions fulfilled the criteria for anaphylaxis in either dose. This study reveals that among patients with mastocytosis, COVID-19 vaccine and infection were well-tolerated in the majority of cases.