Risk Factors for Bowel Injury in Hysterectomy for Benign Indications.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence and risk factors for bowel injury in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among women undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications from 2012 to 2016 at institutes participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, including both inpatient and outpatient settings. Bowel injury was identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes as patients who underwent bowel repair at the time of hysterectomy or postoperatively within 30 days. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to control for patient clinical factors and perioperative factors. RESULTS: Bowel injury occurred in 610 of 155,557 (0.39%) included women. After bivariate analysis, factors associated with bowel injury included age, race, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, increased operative time, surgical approach, type of hysterectomy, lysis of adhesions, and operative indication. After adjusting for potential confounders, bowel injury was found associated with older age, surgical indication of endometriosis, and abdominal surgical approach. Compared with the surgical indication of endometriosis (n=63/10,625), the surgical indications of menstrual disorder (odds ratio [OR] 0.33, 95% CI 0.23-0.47; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.33, 95% CI 0.23-0.48; n=67/34,168), uterine leiomyomas (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.61-1.05; aOR 0.44, 95% CI 0.33-0.59; n=243/51,232), and genital prolapse (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.20-0.45; aOR 0.41, 95% CI 0.25-0.67; n=36/20,384) were each associated with lower odds of bowel injury. Compared with the vaginal approach to hysterectomy (n=27/27,434), the abdominal approach was found to have significantly increased odds of bowel injury (OR 10.80, 95% CI 7.31-15.95; aOR 10.49 95% CI 6.42-17.12; n=401/38,106); the laparoscopic approach had smaller but significantly increased odds (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.37-3.08; aOR 2.03 95% CI 1.24-3.34; n=182/90,017) as well. CONCLUSION: Increased risk of bowel injury is associated with endometriosis and the abdominal surgical approach to hysterectomy. These findings have implications for the surgical care of women with benign uterine disease.

The Use of Pulsed Radiofrequency for the Treatment of Pudendal Neuralgia: A Case Series.

OBJECTIVE: Pudendal neuralgia is a recognized cause of chronic pelvic pain. The diagnosis is complex, and there is no consensus on ideal management. Many current methods do not provide adequate relief. Pulsed radiofrequency is a minimally invasive option that has been reported for its use in other neuropathies. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of using transvaginal pulsed radiofrequency for the treatment of pudendal neuralgia and to generate a hypothesis on its efficacy. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of women who were treated with pulsed radiofrequency for chronic pelvic pain owing to pudendal neuralgia between January 2012 and December 2017 at an academic tertiary care centre. (Canadian Task Force Classification II-3). RESULTS: A total of seven patients were included. The mean age was 43.7 (standard deviation 7.97). The average number of pulsed radiofrequency treatments was 4.43 (range 1-12), and the duration of effect averaged 11.4 weeks (standard deviation 3.09). There were no major or minor complications at the time of procedure or at follow-up visits. CONCLUSIONS: Pulsed radiofrequency may be an effective and safe treatment option for the management of pudendal neuralgia for women in whom conservative management has not been effective. Future controlled studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Uterine Tumors Resembling Ovarian Sex Cord Tumors Identified at Resectoscopic Endometrial Ablation: Report of 2 Cases.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To report 2 cases of uterine tumors resembling ovarian sex cord tumors (UTROSCTs) and examine the clinical significance of these tumors found during hysteroscopic endometrial ablation despite benign preoperative endometrial biopsy analysis and imaging suggestive of leiomyoma. DESIGN: Case report (Canadian Task Force classification III). SETTING: Tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Two patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. INTERVENTIONS: Hysteroscopic endometrial ablation/resection. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pathological analysis of intrauterine tissue/lesions obtained by curettage or resection identified 2 unexpected UTROSCTs masquerading as leiomyomas. Following hysterectomy, no residual UTROSCT was identified in the specimens, and both women are well, one at 1 year postsurgery and the other at 3 years postsurgery. CONCLUSION: Obtaining additional tissue by routine curettage before endometrial ablation and/or endomyometrial resection, in conjunction with removal of any intrauterine lesions, can identify rare unexpected endometrial lesions not sampled by endometrial biopsy, not detected with ultrasound, and masquerading as leiomyomas during endometrial ablation.

Direct Laparoscopic Trocar Insertion: Lessons Learned from Nine Litigated Cases.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To report circumstances and clinical and medicolegal outcomes of 9 litigated cases associated with direct trocar insertion (DTI) injuries to the bowel (7 cases) and major vessel (2 cases) during primary laparoscopic access. DESIGN: A case series from 1990 through 2015 (Canadian Task Force Classification II-2). PATIENTS: Nine litigated cases. INTERVENTIONS: A retrospective review of medical and legal records of litigated cases in Canada reviewed by the primary author (G.A.V.). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The average and range of age and body mass index of the women were 31 years (range, 14-65 years) and 25 kg/m2 (range, 20-35 kg/m2), respectively. Indications for laparoscopy included diagnostic (4), laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (3), pelvic mass (1), and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (1). DTI was performed with 10-mm trocars (5 shielded, 1 reusable, and 3 unknown). Two complications were experienced by patients of the same male surgeon (cases 2 and 9). Injuries included the small bowel (4 cases), colon (3 cases), and major vessel (2 cases). Vascular injuries resulted in permanent brain damage in 1 and near loss of limb in the other; litigation was favorable to the plaintiff in both cases. All bowel injuries presented with signs and symptoms of peritonitis within 3 postoperative days (PODs) (5 patients on POD 1, 1 patient on POD 2, and 1 patient on POD 3); however, only 2 cases were acted upon and remedied with favorable clinical and medicolegal outcomes. A delayed exploratory laparotomy resulted in significant adverse clinical outcomes (ileostomy/colostomy in 4 patients, multiple surgeries in 7 patients, and 1 death), and in all delayed actions, the medicolegal outcomes were favorable to the plaintiff. CONCLUSION: During laparoscopic primary peritoneal access using the DTI technique, inadvertent intra-abdominal injury may be significant when major vessels are involved and when intervention is delayed in bowel injuries. These result in significant adverse clinical complications and may provoke higher litigation with more favorable outcomes for the plaintiff.