RESUMO
Objective: To standardize the distress management of gastric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, the adapted Cancer-related Distress Management Guidelines were implemented in nursing practice among gastric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy based on A Guideline Adaptation and Implementation Planning Resource (CAN-IMPLEMENT). Methods: Based on the theoretical framework of CAN-IMPLEMENT, A multidisciplinary team was established, barriers and facilitators obstacles of guidelines implementation in medical oncology units were assessed, corresponding solutions were formulated, the guidelines implementation process was monitored, and implementation results were evaluated. Results: The multidisciplinary team developed review criteria, standardized work paths, assessment tools, training manuals for healthcare professionals, education manuals for patients and their caregivers. After guidelines implementation, the completion rate of the distress management record came up to 97.9% (189/193). From September 2017 to December 2018, the compliance of medical staff on most items in the audit checklist was improved, ranging from 57.1% (100/175) to 100.0% (193/193). The positive distress rate of gastric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy was decreased from 22.7% (32/141) to 9.3% (18/193) (P < 0.05), and the Median (range) of the distress score declined from 2 (0-9) to 0 (0-7) (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The implementation of guidelines based on CAN-IMPLEMENT promotes the establishment of a distress management system in the medical oncology units. The review standards, standardized work paths, and evaluation tools for distress in cancer patients formulated by the multidisciplinary team had clinical applicability and effectiveness. Quality control in the practice of distress management was effective. The compliance of healthcare professionals with distress management was improved. The distress of gastric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy was alleviated effectively.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to adapt relevant clinical practice guidelines for distress management in cancer patients based on A Guideline Adaptation and Implementation Planning Resource (CAN-IMPLEMENT), and develop Cancer-related Distress Management Guidelines in the context of the research site. METHODS: According to CAN-IMPLEMENT, the symptoms of cancer patients in Shanghai were investigated, and a work plan was formulated to adapt cancer-related distress management guidelines. The relevant clinical practice guidelines for distress management in cancer patients were searched, screened and assessed, the contents of the included clinical practice guidelines were screened, extracted and integrated, and the Cancer-related Distress Management Guidelines was developed. After peer review, the Cancer-related Distress Management Guidelines was finally formed. RESULTS: The physical symptom distress score was higher than the psychological symptom distress score among cancer patients in Shanghai. Two clinical practice guidelines related to distress management in cancer patients were included after searching, screening, assessment and selection systematically. The domain scores of the draft Cancer-related Distress Management Guidelines on Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) were 73.75%-87.50%, respectively. The scores of most recommendations on feasibility, appropriateness, meaningfulness and effectiveness were at least 90%. The final guidelines included 13 recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of the draft Cancer-related Distress Management Guidelines based on two included guidelines was well-accepted. The final Cancer-related Distress Management Guidelines needs to be further verified in clinical practice for feasibility, suitability and effectiveness.
RESUMO
In this study, 16 family caregivers of patients with lymphoma were interviewed on their changing perceptions of hope. The changing process starts from diagnosis to the present treatment state. We found that the changing perception of hope can be divided into three stages: the stage of generalized hope focusing merely on treatment and passive hope focusing on harm-avoidance, the stage of specified hope and active hope aiming at comfort-seeking, and the stage of multifaceted hope. Family caregivers' understanding of the past experience of and new information on the disease are the foundation of the perception of hope. The perception of hope in cancer patients' family caregivers develops from "therapeutic hope" to "psychosocial hope," shifting from "consequential hope" to "procedural hope."
