Alterations of Serum Uric Acid Level and Gut Microbiota After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in a Hyperuricemic Rat Model.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to observe alterations of serum uric acid (SUA) level and gut microbiota after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) surgery in a hyperuricemic rat model. METHOD: We performed Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) surgery in a hyperuricemic rat model. Serum uric acid (UA), xanthine oxidase (XO) activity, IL-6, TNF-α and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) level changes, and 16S rDNA of gut microbiota were analyzed. RESULTS: After the surgery, the RYGB and SG procedures significantly reduced body weight, serum UA, IL-6, TNF-α and LPS levels, and XO activity. In addition, the RYGB and SG procedures altered the diversity and taxonomic composition of the gut microbiota. Compared with Sham group, RYGB and SG procedures were enriched in the abundance of phylum Verrucomicrobia and species Akkermansia muciniphila, while the species Escherichia coli was reduced. DISCUSSION: We here concluded that bariatric surgery-induced weight loss and resolution of inflammatory remarkers as well as changes of gut microbiota may be responsible for the reduced XO activity and SUA level. To have a better understanding of the underlying mechanism of UA metabolism following bariatric surgery, further research is needed.

Short-Term Clinical Outcomes After Laparoscopic and Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The different advantages of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and robotic gastrectomy (RG), two new minimally invasive surgical techniques for gastric cancer, remain controversial. PURPOSE: To compare the short-term clinical outcomes of LG and RG. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center comparative study of 1044 patients (LG = 750, RG = 294) was conducted. Patients undergoing LG and RG were matched (2:1 ratio) according to sex, age, BMI, extent of gastric resection, and pathologic stage. The primary outcomes were morbidity and mortality and perioperative recovery parameters; major types of complications were also analyzed. RESULTS: After matching, 798 patients (LG = 532, RG = 266) were included. Both the LG and RG groups showed similar overall complication rates (LG = 12.8% vs RG = 12.4%) and operative mortality (LG = 0.4% vs RG = 0.4%). Compared to those who underwent LG, patients undergoing RG had significantly longer operative times (236.92 ± 57.28 vs 217.77 ± 65.00 min, p < 0.001), higher total costs (US$16,241.42 vs US$12,497, p < 0.001), less operative blood loss (77.07 ± 64.37 vs 103.68 ± 86.92 ml, p < 0.001), higher numbers of retrieved lymph nodes (32.0 vs 29.9, p < 0.001), and higher rates of retrieving more than 16 lymph nodes (94.0 vs 85.5%; p < 0.001). No significant differences between groups were noted in terms of the rate of reoperation, time until a soft diet was consumed, or length of hospital stay. The major complication and readmission rates were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: RG and LG produced similar short-term clinical outcomes, indicating that RG is a safe and beneficial surgical procedure.