RESUMO
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of venetoclax (VEN) in combination with chemotherapy (chemo) versus chemo alone in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Method: To compare the efficacy and/or safety of VEN+chemo versus chemotherapy alone for AML, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were used to searching up to June 2023. Comparisons included complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS), overall response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs). Result: A total of 9 articles were included, including 3124 patients. The baseline characteristics between two patient groups were similar. The combined analysis showed that compared with the group receiving chemo alone, the VEN+chemo group exhibited higher rates of CR, CRi, MLFS and ORR. Additionally, the VEN+chemo group had longer event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) durations. The incidence rates of AEs and serious AEs (SAEs) were similar between the two groups, but the early 30-day mortality rate was lower in the VEN+chemo group than in the chemo alone group. Conclusion: The VEN+chemo therapy demonstrates significant efficacy and safety profile in AML patients. However, more prospective studies are needed in the future to provide more accurate and robust evidence for treatment selection in patients. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023439288, identifier CRD42023439288.
RESUMO
In adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), post-transplant relapse is a major risk factor for mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Our study investigated the efficacy and safety of decitabine (dec) with ALL patients post-transplantation. We performed a retrospective cohort study to assess the efficacy of decitabine (dec) with post-transplant ALL at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from February 2016 to September 2021. A total of 141 consecutive ALL patients were analyzed and divided into decitabine (dec, n = 65) and control (ctrl, n = 76) groups based on whether they were treated with decitabine after allo-HSCT. The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) rate in the dec group was lower than that in the ctrl group (19.6 vs. 36.1%, p = 0.031), with a hazard ratio of 0.491 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.257-0.936). Additionally, subgroup analyses revealed that the 3-year CIR rate of T-ALL and Ph-negative B-ALL patients in the dec and ctrl groups was 11.7 vs. 35.9% and 19.5 vs. 42.2% (p = 0.035, p = 0.068) respectively. In summary, ALL patients, especially those with T-ALL and Ph-negative B-ALL, may benefit from decitabine as maintenance therapy following allo-HSCT.
