Short-term efficacy and safety of TurboHawk atherectomy for in-stent restenosis in peripheral artery disease: a single-centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Information regarding the efficacy of the TurboHawk atherectomy for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) of the lower extremity is scarce. This study was performed to investigate the curative efficacy and safety of the TurboHawk system for ISR in PAD patients over 60 years old. METHODS: The TurboHawk atherectomy device was used to treat ISR in 28 patients with PAD. The intraoperative, 2-day postoperative, 3-month, and 2-year follow-up data were obtained. Differences in the ankle-brachial index (ABI), Rutherford class and minimum diameter of the femoral-popliteal artery were analysed along with the correlations of the factors associated with patency. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (92.86%) had successful surgeries. All patients reported alleviation of pain and intermittent claudication after surgery. One patient who had a malignant hepatoma and coronary heart disease received an amputation on the 76th postoperative day and another patient who had atrial fibrillation received a thrombectomy on the 40th postoperative day. TurboHawk atherectomy increased the ABI (from 0.30 to 0.70, P < 0.0001) and minimum diameter (from 0 to 4.93 mm, P < 0.0001) and reduced the Rutherford class (from 4.00 to 2.00, P < 0.0001). During the 3-month follow-up, the median minimum diameter, ABI, and Rutherford class were 4.12, 0.69, and 2.00, respectively. No death happened during the 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The TurboHawk atherectomy is a safe and effective technique for ISR in PAD patients over 60 years old.

Comparison of clear effect and the complications, and short and mid-term effects between ultrasound-guided and non-guided catheter-directed thrombolysis in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the therapeutic effects of ultrasound-guided and non-guided catheter-directed thrombolysis in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity. METHODS: From August 2015 to April 2016, 60 patients with lower extremity deep venous thrombosis were randomly divided into two groups ( n = 30 for each) to receive catheter-directed thrombolysis. Group A was treated under the ultrasound guidance, while Group B was treated without guidance. RESULTS: Catheter-directed thrombolysis was successfully performed by only one intubate in Group A but by 5.9 intubates in Group B. It took 15.4 ± 3.2 min in Group A, significantly less than that in Group B (30.8 ± 6.6 min, p < 0.05). The incidences of hematoma were also remarkably different between the two groups (3.33% vs. 26.67%, p = 0.026). No pseudoaneurysm or arteriovenous fistula was found in Group A, but there were two cases of pseudoaneurysm and two cases of arteriovenous fistula in Group B (both 6.67%, p = 0.492). The circumference differences of the affected limb between before and after thrombolysis were 49.47 ± 2.484 mm in Group A, significantly higher than that in Group B (28.40 ± 2.856 mm, p < 0.001). After treatment, the venous unobstructed improvement rates and deep vein patency rate were both better than those in Group B (77 + 2.603% vs. 57.23 + 1.828% and 80% vs. 46.67%, respectively; p < 0.001). There were only three cases of PTS in Group A (10%, 3/30), but there were 11 cases in Group B (36.67%, 11/30). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided catheter-directed thrombolysis has advantages, with improvement of venous patency and decrease of the incidence of PTS.